Sounds exciting
again, as I understand it, it maybe a great investment, it maybe the worst ever, does it matter ?
Surely this case is ONLY about if its lawful ?
Sounds like a good investment for CCC, ACL, and city of Coventry...win, win, win.
Oh hold on, who loses out here...SISU - guess they wished they'd played fairly now.
It's a fucking awful deal and on a company valued at less than half the loan,
It woke a few people up but I think they thought the session was over and were ready to jump up for the judge's exit. 5 mins to go...
It woke a few people up but I think they thought the session was over and were ready to jump up for the judge's exit. 5 mins to go...
What about ccfc, is it a good deal for us??
It's a fucking awful deal and on a company valued at less than half the loan,
Now the Council QC says Sisu’s argument is riddled with fallacies.
Or pooNow the Council QC says Sisu’s argument is riddled with fallacies.
I think its the club losing out. Who cares eh?
I think its the club losing out. Who cares eh?
time for a last minute winner or own goal
Yes it should have been good for ccfc aswell, because it allowed ACL to offer a substantially better rent deal to ccfc, which if you remember, SISU turned down.What about ccfc, is it a good deal for us??
It's a fucking awful deal and on a company valued at less than half the loan,
Now the Council QC says Sisu’s argument is riddled with fallacies.
Is that the 400k for 3 years and then back to 1.2m. Genuine question, I have cotton wool brain atm.Yes it should have been good for ccfc aswell, because it allowed ACL to offer a substantially better rent deal to ccfc, which if you remember, SISU turned down.
Yet YB were willing to loan £15.5m at a higher interest rate.......:thinking about:
So if you lent me say £14,400 over 41 years and I paid you £19,500 in interest alone (so a grand total of £34,300) you wouldn't bite my hand off?
Is that the 400k for 3 years and then back to 1.2m. Genuine question, I have cotton wool brain atm.
Judge questioning CCC QC on time required. CCC QC waffling but says will finish before lunch (with 9.30 start) then ACL QC.
We may be done mid-afternoon..? Then judge's judging time...
Court told the lowest £6.4m valuation of ACL’s lease was based on ACL never getting rent from CCFC or any other anchor tenants for the remaining 43 years of ACL’s Ricoh Arena lease
again, as I understand it, it maybe a great investment, it maybe the worst ever, does it matter ?
Surely this case is ONLY about if its lawful ?
No fun things released...
this bit i dont get, didnt ACL say its turnover was more than ever this year ?
Council QC says Sisu have taken blinkered approach. Ignored other ACL revenue streams and a potential return to the Ricoh to play in Nham
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?