dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
The same happened in the other case with the judge continuously dragging SISU back in line only to call it a draw.
Guilty secret - I have got a bottle of champagne (actual champagne, not your Cava muck) on ice, ready for the possible CCC victory in this case. As much as I don't want to tempt fate by saying this, the exchanges on the CT website don't read at all well for SISU.
All preparation for the big party when SISU feck off and we march back into the Ricoh heads held high!
@sub
Thanks for helping this thread by posting updates and feeds. Helped keep us all up to date :claping hands:
no. It would be nice if the verdict went so: Yes, ccc didn't follow correct procedure, but the deal was sound. Bollockings all round and a strongly worded summing up that this case should never have been brought in the first place and that the parties should sort out their differences through serious negotiation instead of clogging up the legal system. There is a purpose built football stadium in coventry and sisu own a football club called " coventry city ". No brainer.
No right to appeal. Now f*ck off!
The same happened in the other case with the judge continuously dragging SISU back in line only to call it a draw.
The court also heard how a £400,000 Ricoh rent deal was agreed in principle between the club and ACL in January 2014 but the council QC said this was later rejected by the club.
... 2014???
Sorry to say but this is poor reasoning from a normally good poster.
It really isn't.
Anybody who focusses on one event as game changer is wrong.
An event can be a catalyst, or a cog... but it is not the be-all and end all.
And yes, the number of threads deciding the JR will mean after it concludes that either straight away:
CCC will sell to SISU, we'll ove back, it'll be sweetness and light or;
SISU will run for the hills, offer a fabulous deal to a wonderul benefactor who will move us back to the RIcoh and all will be sweetness and light.
Says many do see it in isolation as the event.
A comment about the probablility of winning the case, incidentally, doesn't mean the case itself will change everything in isolation. It's people reading that into it that does so.
Are we back at the Ricoh yet?
What if SISU feck off and pull the plug on the club and leave us high and dry? Strong possibilty in my opinionGuilty secret - I have got a bottle of champagne (actual champagne, not your Cava muck) on ice, ready for the possible CCC victory in this case. As much as I don't want to tempt fate by saying this, the exchanges on the CT website don't read at all well for SISU.
All preparation for the big party when SISU feck off and we march back into the Ricoh heads held high!
The real issue is where does the club go from here. The council will never satisfy new owners goals regarding the Ricoh let alone the present ones.
Lets hope they are dumb enough to build a new ground - otherwise we are dead.
What about now?
Fans HAVE been building it up.
This sodding forum is full of the evidence, man!
Are you implying that it had nothing to do with what Labovitch and Timothy were saying all the time?
Some might say 'if only'Its fascinating to see where the anger is directed.
The fact that the club were accountable for 75% of its value and were paying 100% of the mortgage doesn't bother anyone. I'm speechless.
Tomorrow apparantly when the council smash sisu and force them to come crawling back.
Hope I get my seat back.
You mean the bit where FIsher said the JR wasn't actually relevant to us coming back?
Or the bit where there was a long term plan regardless?
I'm implying exactly what I said, the evidence is in front of your nose!
And you can't remember anything that they said before that?
I am presenting the other bits that you choose to ignore...
Because you want to take the bits that suitan argument that the JR is built up, thus proving my point!
So you say that we have been going on about the JR for ages but come out with the most recent comments from them and ignore the ones we have been debating for ages.
They're notthe recent comments!
They're just the comments ignored!
Anagram games. Well, we might be a cranky bunch but we've still got a bit of class.
Slightly bizarre moment during the recent break. Got into a conversation with Pat Abel (Tickets for Schools and all round CCFC hero) & Joy just outside the ladies loo re: JS being chased by photographers yesterday. She seemed to think the whole episode was a bit weird.
(Back in court. Pat's handing round the mints now.)
Considering they have made lots and lots of comments
we are CCFC.
Anyone else just a little concerned that something bad is going to happen tomorrow ?
Which is kind of my point...
Nothing in these two days has changed my mind that the Sisu strategy is totally incompetent. In God's name, what ARE they doing?
If they'd just play nice, negotiate, build bridges, pay a decent price for what they want. Build the club, get the fans on their side (that's asking a lot I know). They must be losing so much money, and for what? Somebody tell me.
They're sitting on a goldmine, if only they'd take a slightly longer term view, let's say 3 or 4 years. CCFC fans are so desperate for a tiny upward turn, if we had a good season next season, at the Ricoh, really pushing for promotion, they'd make money. We'd forgive the odd star player going for a good price if they replaced them. (Thinking back to the Scott Dann/Danny Fox way of looking at it). 3 or 4 years, getting back to Championship (The 2nd Division in my book) maybe building a top end team. & I'm not talking about overspending stupidly either.
It ain't rocket science.
Instead we have this niggardly cheapskate approach.
Go on Tim/Joy, have a go at it. You know it makes sense.
Which is kind of my point...
Has Alan authorised your article for tomorrow's CET yet Simon?
Doesn't matter about not mentioning it Simon, because I knew we could rely on Stupot to remind us as I'm sure he will again and again and again and again.....................and again.
Not wishing to shirk responsibility but Keith writes those
Also "learnt" probably isn't quite right. It's more a highlights thing.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?