Couple of things that have been filed at Company house.
First off the Sky Blue Sports & Leisure group accounts have been filed. They are noted as received but not yet available to download
The mortgage charges taken out by ARVO and SBS&L over CCFC H have been cancelled
No accounts have yet been filed for CCFC H (none are even marked as received). Still part of SBS&L group so will wait see if any get filed
I am guessing but I think CCFC H now has no assets so will be wound up. Will wait and see. CCFC H has the B class shares given to the supporter shareholders when SISU took over. If CCFC H is wound up I assume those will disappear
Cant second guess what will be in the accounts to be honest
If I were in the SISU position I would be liquidating both CCFC Ltd and CCFC H. Companies in liquidation do not have to file accounts. Not saying there is or isnt anything to hide but no accounts publically available means a lot less questions.
If CCFC H goes then the tenuous link that some supporters had in shares of CCFC H and therefore the club go too.
All part of a "tidying up" exercise. But in essence we are back where we started before SISU got here in 2008 in terms of structure. There is a holding company SBS&L (was CCFC H before SISU) and an operating company Otium (was CCFC Ltd before SISU).............. we are back to where we started in 1995 in terms of structure of the Group.
So, you can strip assets from company A and put them into company B. Then liquidate company A leaving its creditors with nothing and you don't have to file accounts.
You can then move all the assets from company B into company C, liquidate company B and you don't have to file accounts.
Any evidence of fraud or illegality is therefore eliminated. No wonder there is clamour for the law to be reformed.
Please correct me if I'm wrong but couldn't this 'tidying up' have happened without the admin and all the legal wrangles, which effectively stitched acl up?
Especially essing as the structure is exactly as it was before...just proves what this was all about doesn't it, and it wasn't rent
Thanks OSB. I suspect the FL may have seen this as an option that Sisu could pursue and therefore used as an excuse to sit back and do nothing. Tells me that acquiring the Ricoh and more debt dumping (a non technical term) is next up. Should make the proposed talks interesting
So, you can strip assets from company A and put them into company B. Then liquidate company A leaving its creditors with nothing and you don't have to file accounts.
You can then move all the assets from company B into company C, liquidate company B and you don't have to file accounts.
Any evidence of fraud or illegality is therefore eliminated. No wonder there is clamour for the law to be reformed.
Please correct me if I'm wrong but couldn't this 'tidying up' have happened without the admin and all the legal wrangles, which effectively stitched acl up?
Especially essing as the structure is exactly as it was before...just proves what this was all about doesn't it, and it wasn't rent
Interesting point - good way to break the lease agreement also, but I suspect the process explainded by OSB explains why Sisu jumped into the admin process before ACL, and ACl's refusal to accept the CVA.
Please correct me if I'm wrong but couldn't this 'tidying up' have happened without the admin and all the legal wrangles, which effectively stitched acl up?
Especially essing as the structure is exactly as it was before...just proves what this was all about doesn't it, and it wasn't rent