SBKid you shouldn't be on this forum because you can't take anybody having a differing opinion to yourself!
I've just read this whole thread and witnessed you turning on Duffy for no apparent reason. You did the same with me calling me a c**t etc, you've got issues pal which maybe you should air somewhere else.
All the best
You truly are the master of all debaters.
You get wound up far too easily when things don't go your way. You need to chill and stop antagonising people. Just take people's opinions as there's and yours as yours. Simples
All the best
No that Thorn had no/little knowledge of the contract negotiations, all he done was rang Thorn to tell him he had verbally agreed a contract to stay. He didn't negotiate the contract with Thorn.Odd as it was thorn who gleefully announced to the press "marlon told me he has some bad news, he will be staying for another year". Are you saying king said that with no knowledge of the contract details or are you saying thorn never had the conversation in the first place?
Read my last postDeluded is an impressionist then??? because I'm fooking sure as anyone can be it was King on the phone to Thorn. As much as I detest SISU I hate the liar(Proven in court) Woman beater(Proven in court) and the thirteen other times, he's been found guilty in court, KING.....You telling me you'll take his word against Thorn? If so, it's(Pardon the pun) you who is deluded.
Not once have you said anything to defend Thorn. He is a decent man, (a shit manager), but a nice guy. If the truth be known, I'd say you were on a wind up mate.
I've told you before, I respect others opinions, but when they spew rubbish which they either refuse to, or cant back up(Ring any bells?) and then try to make out it is MY comments/opinions, and even with substantiated proof, say that I am wrong, THAT is when I fight back!
Do you remember saying....I didn't say DION!!!.......in the most hated Cov players?
At least THREE of us have got Black and White proof that you DID say it.
See what I mean about Wankahs who lie and when found out STILL profess to be telling the truth.
Read my last post
EDIT: Also King never denied the conversation with Thorn, he just said the offer which he had agreed was never formally offered to him.
It is the boards word vs Kings, Thorns word is not proof of anything.
By King telling Thorn via the phone, that he has accepted SISU offer verbally, in itself shows what a lowlife he is.
My point is HE ACCEPTED the offer, and I couldn't care less if it was for 1 year or 100 years....Doesn't that mean anything to any of you? If not...you're no better than he is.
Yea sure ok, fucking moron.If not...you're no better than he is.
Yea sure ok, fucking moron.
I am as bad as someone who was jailed because of sexual assault because I don't trust the coventry city board at the time to tell us the truth :thinking about:
I am not taking sides and saying King was in the right all I was saying is that I don't trust either side to give us the truth and it isn't as clear as you make out.
If you think I am as bad as King because I didn't lap up everything the club (who have lied countless times) said about the King fiasco then yes that makes you a moron imo, the "fucking" was for emphasisBecause I have morals and principals it makes me a "Fucking Moron" does it?.........PRICK
Because I have morals and principals it makes me a "Fucking Moron" does it?.........PRICK
I am not one to throw insults around normally but it is like debating with a 10 year old boy, he constantly avoids the difficult points and responds to made up points no one has even made, this guy could argue with his own shadow.Here we go again. Go to PM if you want to insult each other. Have respect. Kids come on here.
I am not one to throw insults around normally but it is like debating with a 10 year old boy, he constantly avoids the difficult points and responds to made up points no one has even made, this guy could argue with his own shadow.
"Because I have morals and principals it makes me a "Fucking Moron" does it?"
Where have I said having morals making him a moron, I called him a moron because he told me I am no better than King because I question the Coventry City boards truthfulness.
Let's just say my eldest daughter is 27 this year and my youngest lad is 2. Been round the block a few times, but ready to do many more laps otherwise wouldn't have a 2 and 3 year old. so yes, have a little experience in life.
How about you?
Let's just say I have a 38 years old son, and I also have a 7 years old daughter. I too have been around the block as well.
The gist of what I'm saying is YOU should know the meaning of morals and principals
This younger generation wouldn't know which armpit they were under!
Let's just say I have a 38 years old son, and I also have a 7 years old daughter. I too have been around the block as well.
The gist of what I'm saying is YOU should know the meaning of morals and principals
This younger generation wouldn't know which armpit they were under!
I am not one to throw insults around normally but it is like debating with a 10 year old boy, he constantly avoids the difficult points and responds to made up points no one has even made, this guy could argue with his own shadow.
"Because I have morals and principals it makes me a "Fucking Moron" does it?"
Where have I said having morals making him a moron, I called him a moron because he told me I am no better than King because I question the Coventry City boards truthfulness.
If that is true you should stop behaving like your 7 year old son and start acting like an adult.
Quite a few of you come from the CET Forums i see!....That explains things very clearly now.
I've never been on the CET forum so count me out of the Sky Blue Juvenile.
The argument you are poorly articulating I believe is that king was wrong to verbally agree a deal and the renague. Well people can verbally agree a house purchase then withdraw at a minutes notice with no legal comeback. Despite the nonsense about Scotland the answer is no.
You mean like me Howzer
I didn't say I agree with what King did, the only point I have tried to make is that I can't put the blame solely on anyone for what happened. As both sides have contradicting stories which blame each other and as I don't trust either side to tell the truth, you then started bringing up Thorn but I doubt he was involved directly in contract negotiations so would just hear one side of the story from the board.Ok!, let's put it this way prick! you didn't call me a moron...you called me a "Fucking Moron"
It shows how thick you are when you can't even see what you, yourself has written!
For the last time....If you open your eyes and actually READ! what I said.
I didn't say you were no better than King because you question Coventry city boards truthfulness at all.
I said it makes you no better than King if you agree with what he did, after HE phoned THORN, and said he was staying with Coventry(Verbal Agreement)
then goes back on his word(Lack of morals and principals)
Now if you want to twist my words....go ahead.
And YES! I was right about "cliques" You're all(With some exceptions, like a pack of Wolves who can smell blood!) Quite a few of you come from the CET Forums i see!....That explains things very clearly now.
I didn't say I agree with what King did, the only point I have tried to make is that I can't put the blame solely on anyone for what happened. As both sides have contradicting stories which blame each other and as I don't trust either side to tell the truth, you then started bringing up Thorn but I doubt he was involved directly in contract negotiations so would just hear one side of the story from the board.
You keep banging on about King going back on his word but what if it was the board who went back on there word?
We are going to offer you a 3 year contract (verbal)
No 3 year contract offered (Lack of morals)
But you can't even seem to consider that is what happened that way even though our board and owners also have a clear lack of morals.
I am not saying that is what I believe happened but with both sides as bad as each other it could well have happened either way.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?