Where do we all think we will be playing home games in a couple of years.
Much better. Concentrates for the most part on the green belt angle and the special consideration for the academy. Am I right in saying that the kicking barn will take over existing green space? If so surely that's a further erosion of green belt and in dispute with the original planning agreement for the AEHC development to happen in the first place? Also does the special consideration for the academy also throw a spanner in the works for the swimming pool?
I feel if the club goes into tomorrows meeting with these points rather than making it personal (I know it is personal but playing the victim will gain us nothing) that is our bed chance.
If it gets the nod anyway can we appeal it further? Central government for example? Isn't that where an appeal would go if it was turned down? Is it the same if you want to appeal an approval?
How do CCFC get round the fact that their agreement to be there ends 30-06-2016 after which they have no rights to be there. CSF / CAWAT simply have to refuse to renew and the Academy is gone
Much better. Concentrates for the most part on the green belt angle and the special consideration for the academy. Am I right in saying that the kicking barn will take over existing green space? If so surely that's a further erosion of green belt and in dispute with the original planning agreement for the AEHC development to happen in the first place? Also does the special consideration for the academy also throw a spanner in the works for the swimming pool?
I feel if the club goes into tomorrows meeting with these points rather than making it personal (I know it is personal but playing the victim will gain us nothing) that is our bed chance.
If it gets the nod anyway can we appeal it further? Central government for example? Isn't that where an appeal would go if it was turned down? Is it the same if you want to appeal an approval?
Sport England regs regarding playing field planning permission is here
https://www.sportengland.org/facili...ent/planning-applications/playing-field-land/
Where do we all think we will be playing home games in a couple of years.
Perhaps if we successfully maintain our academy at the AEHC we could allow wasps ro use some of the facilities in exchange for a favorable rental agreement at the Ricoh with more access to revenue.
Isn't that the basing of the planning permission only being granted because of them in the first place argument?
I don't think you can appeal against approval, SBT, only against failure to grant approval. I believe the only route would be, once again, a Judicial Review. I'd imagine we've got our own seats at the High Court now, and a season ticket for the parking facility.
probably but then CSF can point to the community usage and advantages - cant see Sec of State calling for the AHC to be knocked down and returned to green belt after all this time
Still boils down to sorting a new deal for CCFC - possibly with landlords who are even less inclined to be sympathetic - the pragmatist in me says it will boil down to money talks but......
I don't think you can appeal against approval, SBT, only against failure to grant approval. I believe the only route would be, once again, a Judicial Review. I'd imagine we've got our own seats at the High Court now, and a season ticket for the parking facility.
Shame. It would be nice to resolve something without going to a judicial review. Not that going to a judicial review has resolved anything yet.
Club managing director Chris Anderson insisted on the written proposal before agreeing to meet for talks over the Higgs Centre. He made the demand after the club pulled out of a prearranged meeting to discuss the way forward.
http://www.ccfc.co.uk/news/article/...jection-letter-alan-higgs-centre-3222442.aspx
much more like it
Downside is CSF just wait for user agreement to end
On the telegraph article:
That isn't true, he said about it being in writing from the start!
It is better, however I'd wager Tim Fisher did not take this into consideration when the club left the Higgs in 2013.
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/sky-blues-leave-alan-higgs-4870037
Re-reading this article now is quite interesting. one can see how the strategy to continue without CCFC was triggered at this time, because....
1) CCFC claimed the company Higgs were now dealing with (CCFC Holdings) wasn't the one Higgs were insured for (CCFC Ltd).
2) CCFC refusal to pay maintenance bills for which they were libel.
Intemperate actions had what are turning out to be far reaching consequences..
“We’ve done ten years as an Academy and now it’s going to be a different life for the building,” conceded Peter Knatchbull-Hugessen
Completely irrelevant isn't it? Far one thing the AHT was in charge at that time, not CSF.
I'd say what was really happening was the beginning of the AHT led strategy to do a deal for Wasps (who they were more than likely in early negotiation with back in 2013):
That's a separate issue really. And if Wasps get refused planning permission do you not think CSF might be keen for the academy to stay?How do CCFC get round the fact that their agreement to be there ends 30-06-2016 after which they have no rights to be there. CSF / CAWAT simply have to refuse to renew and the Academy is gone
That's a separate issue really. And if Wasps get refused planning permission do you not think CSF might be keen for the academy to stay?
Not sure how its really relevant to Wasps planning application but you've got that slightly wrong:Re-reading this article now is quite interesting. one can see how the strategy to continue without CCFC was triggered at this time, because....
1) CCFC claimed the company Higgs were now dealing with (CCFC Holdings) wasn't the one Higgs were insured for (CCFC Ltd).
2) CCFC refusal to pay maintenance bills for which they were libel.
I don't think it will get refused either but I can't see how you can bypass objections just by going we might not let the current tenants stay anyway.I don't think they will get refused.
That's a separate issue really. And if Wasps get refused planning permission do you not think CSF might be keen for the academy to stay?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?