skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
Like someone has already pointed out. Put in an FOI. If you can put in an FOI to find out how many paper clips the council use in a year I can't imagine that this isn't covered.
I would say looking at the guidelines they can and do
I think he knows the answer is they haven't invested and prefers to leave it at that and allude to some collusion going on because it supports his SISU love in rather than to get off his ass and seek out the facts.Like someone has already pointed out. Put in an FOI. If you can put in an FOI to find out how many paper clips the council use in a year I can't imagine that this isn't covered.
Like someone has already pointed out. Put in an FOI. If you can put in an FOI to find out how many paper clips the council use in a year I can't imagine that this isn't covered.
I think he knows the answer is they haven't invested and prefers to leave it at that and allude to some collusion going on because it supports his SISU love in rather than to get off his ass and seek out the facts.
What is covered is anything that is not commercially sensitive. So its possible that any investor may want to ensure investments remain anonymous. So looking through the guidelines I think its not available - anything with commercial confidentiality isn't
I think he knows the answer is they haven't invested and prefers to leave it at that and allude to some collusion going on because it supports his SISU love in rather than to get off his ass and seek out the facts.
Risks relating the head lease of the Arena granted to ACL2006
Under the terms of the head lease granted by Coventry City Council (“CCC”) to Arena Coventry (2006) Limited (“ACL2006”) in respect of the Arena (the “Head Lease”), CCC have reserved the right to forfeit the Head Lease if ACL2006 becomes insolvent. Insolvency in this scenario means a situation where ACL2006 becomes unable to pay its debts, has a receiver/administrator/provisional liquidator appointed over its assets, has assets seized in order to pay debts of ACL2006 or has a winding-up order made against it. The effect of forfeiture would be that the 250 year Head Lease would fall away and that ACL would then become the tenant of CCC at the Arena for the remaining 38 years of its existing lease. However, the right of CCC to claim forfeiture of the Head Lease is not an automatic right. If CCC made a claim for such forfeiture, this could be contested by ACL2006, any third party that held security over ACL2006 and any subtenants of ACL2006 by making application to a court in England. Further, if an administrator was to be appointed over the assets of ACL2006, then CCC would not be able to forfeit the Head Lease without the consent of the appointed administrator or with the leave of the courts.
Tony started the "who invested where" discussion
Where are you getting that councils are allowed to invest in bond's from? I'm looking and can't find anything.
The Powers of Investment allows risk investments as well as secure investments - given the exposure councils faced when investing in Iceland Banks a few years ago its a perfectly legitimate source of investment as potentially the returns on reserves are high
What's that? An opinion or are you quoting something?
I'm quoting the Guidance on Local Government Investments issued in March 2010
Interesting concept Grendell, maybe the pension fund is split between dodgy weapons traders and now Wasps too......would answer a few mysteries wouldn't itCouncils can invest reserves in Bonds can't they?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?