Kingokings204
Well-Known Member
Fair point but then why didn't they get round the table and do a deal similar to what wasps got way before wasps got in?
Pay more than wasps paid for the lot - no veto, still paying £1.3 million rent, no dividends, no voting rights
Amazed they didn't when you think about it.
Your quite right of course, how can it be their fault the rent was so high, after all in thoseI love how it is SISU terrible at business for our high rent, that was set before they were here...
Quite right. Much better to spend the next 10 years or so losing money, pissing off your customers and partner organisations and embarrassing yourself in court trying to blame someone else for your mistakes. Still you must be happy that we cant compete with Rotherham for players these days. We'll probably be struggling to compete with the financial muscle of Exeter City next year. That damn ruthless council's fault i guess.Pay more than wasps paid for the lot - no veto, still paying £1.3 million rent, no dividends, no voting rights
Amazed they didn't when you think about it.
I thought they were making plans for this years ago- even identified some sites i thought. Wasps and the council will be gutted if they don't have to deal with SISU anymore. They must piss themselves when Fisher and Anderson turn up with their empty threats.Central news stating CCFC will consider a move away from Ricoh if academy cant use the Higgs as part of the Cat 2 program.
Central news stating CCFC will consider a move away from Ricoh if academy cant use the Higgs as part of the Cat 2 program.
Looks like he was asked a question and said possibly.
Either way, article is to try and make fans get behind them. / annoyed at wasps and csf.
It doesn't look too much of a threat, he was asked a question and answered.You would think that they learned from last time that threatening to take the ball away isn't the way to do it and actually doing it even less so.
Problem is that with SISU's history of doing the same things expecting different results you wouldn't put this past them.
This is a worrying development.
Interesting your first comment is to say that. They didn't learn the last time the dolly was chucked out the pram and they took us to NorthamptonLooks like he was asked a question and said possibly.
Either way, article is to try and make fans get behind them. / annoyed at wasps and csf. Obvious which way it will go though.
First comment is to say what? They were answering a question?Interesting your first comment is to say that. They didn't learn the last time the dolly was chucked out the pram and they took us to Northampton
Asked if the club may again have to find another home ground because of these factors
It doesn't look too much of a threat, he was asked a question and answered.
It doesn't also mean it would be through choice, if wasps won't have us there!
How is it on the defence?Straight on the defensive for them. Surprise surprise. Not.
It was a stupid reply considering our history and he should have just brushed the question aside so a reply couldn't have been picked up on. All he's done is change the focus for the fan base. That's either incompetence or deliberate.
Looks like he was asked a question and said possibly.
Either way, article is to try and make fans get behind them. / annoyed at wasps and csf. Obvious which way it will go though.
Of course they are, it's ccfc.Those sort of statements are probably going to do the opposite.
The BBC have quoted CA saying it also
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-coventry-warwickshire-36964166
Silly bugger games have begun.
They have said about the kicking barn in every article, just as csf have said door is open.Have nt they , just , Here goes the start of another long running saga. At least the beeb , said Wasps are willing to share facilities , Whilst the club dont have a pot to pee in , I think they should get round the table quick.
"Asked if the club may again have to find another home ground because of these factors - after a groundshare with Northampton in the 2013-14 season - Mr Anderson said: "Possibly, but it's too early to tell."
Nobody should be encouraging this type of language from the club. If CA is too stupid to understand that those factors will only get worse should the club move again on their whim he needs it explaining to him.
The only people screwing us over are SISU. Go build their own academy its no one else's responsibility. Why do you keep defending the inept fools? They have fucked your football club up with their genius business decisions.How is it on the defence?
Ive just pointed out that it was answering a question, rather than an out and out threat.
All that will change the focus for the fans is people getting outraged by it and the telegraph articles that will be spun off it.
Didn't we already know it's a possibility about the ricoh anyway? He didn't say they would move us, it's probably more to do with no choice
Only on a ccfc fan site would somebody get annoyed because somebody else isn't reading into things to make the club look bad, while they fight the corner of a rugby club and csf who screw us over.
The only people screwing us over are SISU. Go build their own academy its no one else's responsibility. Why do you keep defending the inept fools? They have fucked your football club up with their genius business decisions.
Started writing a reply saying that even our council aren't going to fall for some of that. Then I remember who we are dealing with and changed my mind!Sorry if this has already been posted, haven't seen it on any thread. This is a mail from CSF to Wasps based on the club's original objection letter.
How does that work then, you have to accept this planning application because if you don't another one we haven't even submitted and don't have the funding for might not happen.i) there would potentially be limited scope for delivering water (swimming) space on the site, if there were not to be a re‐provisioning of the indoor playing pitch facility as proposed by Wasps within the planning application;
ii) there is absolutely no assurance that the existing user relationship with CCFC would continue beyond June 2017, regardless of the outcome of the Wasps Training Ground planning application, subject to the considerations of the relative demands of indoor dry side space versus wet side pool space; and the commercial and objective judgement of the Directors / Trustees as to a continuing business relationship with any organisation that would be looking to effectively stifle or dictate its charitable and strategically important community ambitions[/I].
Yeah, to where exactly?Central news stating CCFC will consider a move away from Ricoh if academy cant use the Higgs as part of the Cat 2 program.
We're in a slightly different situation this time. Wasps won't talk to us regarding extending our Ricoh deal and are academy facility is being removed. Doesn't leave us with a lot of options does it?You would think that they learned from last time that threatening to take the ball away isn't the way to do it and actually doing it even less so.
Should he have refused to answer?Nobody should be encouraging this type of language from the club.
Should he have refused to answer?
Surely you use the MP stock no committal answer don't you?We're in a slightly different situation this time. Wasps won't talk to us regarding extending our Ricoh deal and are academy facility is being removed. Doesn't leave us with a lot of options does it?
Should he have refused to answer?
Surely you use the MP stock no committal answer don't you?
An MP would never answer like that straight away. A political answer would be something like 'We are focusing all our attention on resolving the current situation, (and/or) and coming to an agreement whereby we can continue to play at the Ricoh for the foreseeable future.
I completely disagree with SISU's approach on legal action, they reap what they sow.
The game is clear, the parties under attack are ramping up the pressure while the court cases continue.
If SISU can't see that they are fools, if they continue they harm the long term prospects of the club.
But that's irrelevant isn't it.I'd guess that would get the MP's answer response from our fans wouldn't it?
But that's irrelevant isn't it.
I hate the way MP's answer questions when there should be a straight committal and definitive reply, but at times it is needed.
All of focus at the moment, at least in terms of plain statement, should be about resolving this current situation.
We have no money and nowhere to go.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?