If they don't have anyone to have a go at and TM has said that he wants Fisher to keep his gob shut as part of him staying as manager what reason do they have to hold another meeting?
The original concept of SCG was to improve the match day experience although that may have changed slightly in recent times.
The SCG may not be perfect but its the only way of contact with the club and getting points over to those at CCFC. If SW or TF are not at a meeting there are always other club representatives at meeting who will listen to any issues.
Also remember that the SCG Chair and Vice Chair are attending CCFC board meeting on our behalf to ask questions and report back to us as supporters.
Therefore we do need these meetings to be taking place on a regular basis, if you agree or disagree with the SCG its our access to those who run our club.
Who knows. All I know is Italia rabbited on and he flip flops according to his whim. Anyway, can't be arsed with the tedium of this, let's get on with complaining about PW being a whiny old Queen, that's something all of us can agree on!
Surely you can't just ignore the fact that this meeting totally ignores to 2 big issues that could take us over the financial brink? Seems to be a collection of Sisu yes men.
Wasps may effectively control our future why can I not mention them in a thread about a meeting that supposedly is giving this club direction?
The thread is about the SCG for CCFC not CCC. When you turn up as per usual to start waffling on about CCC despite the subject having SFA to do with them it's deflection pure and simple.
The meeting in May was cancelled, no date yet confirmed for June meeting
Waggot says an announcement on the date in imminent and Fisher says they are down to the last 2 or 3 venues to choose from, but hopes to have some news in the new year.
Anyway schmeee, here's your culprit!
The threat that I would and backed by others made the club come back.
He won't be interested as Italia regularly has council sweetcorn caught between his teeth.
Not seen it myself. What's it like?
Better than TF"s knob
This was a good thread and as usual ruined by a few individuals who as always divert it to rubbish.
This was a good thread and as usual ruined by a few individuals who as always divert it to rubbish.
says the pompous twat who when challenged by club patsy PW claims not to speak for SBT despite being chairman!
What's good about a thread that people revert to type when they don't like someone's opinion?
Do we sit back and take it or banter back.
?
Most threads burn out after a day anyway.
but I never got the chance to challenge the minutes.
true, they do just die but the SCG could be useful if run and organised and run better.
It it could be but it doesn't seem it can be under the current leadership and it is important to keep good people within to remove Ward and also thin down the amount of club staff within it, it would also make sense to remove Garlick who is also fairly toxic
tbf to Ms. Garlick, has she done anything other than put her head above the parapit to run a Stadium Consultative Group?
tbf to Ms. Garlick, has she done anything other than put her head above the parapit to run a Stadium Consultative Group?
So she brings nothing to the party then so may as well not be on the committee
What she doesn't do, in these minutes at least, is whine like the chair does.
There are a fair few whose initials barely crop up in these minutes. That's not necessarily unusual though, is it.
Not sure it's overly constructive to focus in on personalities in a group really. The problem, in fact, is any content gets lost amidst the personalities. Which is why the chair might be better served taking up any personal grievances outside of this meeting, as his POV is as valid as any other, but he's allowing it to get sidetracked and really, if the minutes are a true record, seems to do a remarkably poor job of chairing the group lately!
Very true nw the chair seems to start the meetings getting all his whinges out of the way he would be better served on here
He'd be cracking on here
Wonder who he is... :thinking about:
Got to love this type of post.
It is up there with the "I am so drunk, I am typing perfectly though" sorts.
Thats not what was actually said but I never got the chance to challenge the minutes and in my view much more important things to try and discuss.
As for being pompous at least I put my head above the water and am not a disgusting little coward who's only interest in life is to hide behind a keyboard and insult others. Stop the rubbish and do something constructive you horrible little person.
not sure what you mean, he called me out so I told him why I wasnt getting involved. even when i get back though im going to do my best never to get involved again, seems so easy when your away but for some reason a lot trickier when you are bored on a wet monday
To be fair there is logic there. Northampton was always temporary Wasps isn't. I haven't read all the thread. Why are we talking about Wasps? I assume someone pro-Sisu was losing an argument somewhere.[/QUOTE
Not much logic from Italia using his own arguments that Northampton was always temporary, but we only came back because he stayed away.
Now that would be telling?tbf to Ms. Garlick, has she done anything other than put her head above the parapit to run a Stadium Consultative Group?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?