skybluetony176
Well-Known Member
I'll throw that straight back at you. How is it going to hinder? Is it wrong to tell them how we feel as a supporter base even if the timetable for them leaving is already set?
The same as sixfields when the telegraph jumped on it at the last minute?
Pretty sure I've said from the start if I'm wrong I'll look silly and more than eat humble pie, but let's not pretend if something happens in a year or do everything is down to them. I dread the thought of when you realise we didn't come back because of their bring city home campaign, no matter how much they will push that.
How is a petition and publishing silly crap from people like psb group and awful Photoshop protests going to get rid of sisu?
You are getting a bit eccentric recently.
I will give you a clue spend most of the game with my head in my hands at the moment and I sit next to a celebrity fan
You can't block him. He's a black belt ninja...Is hadji still with us I haven't seen him for a while I wonder if I still have him blocked
Celebrity!?
Famous enough to have a wiki page!?
What!! Milwall.I'm the one with the cov top on, hadji has a i hate everyone shirt on i think
Corrected it for you.Not exactly, I rolled over and was surprised to see there was someone else there in the Park.
It's highlighted what a fuck up our club is and how it's effected the fan base. How is that wrong? How is that kicking the club? Surely the fact that the stories exist is that someone else is kicking the club? Or are the telegraph just making these stories up? How many corrections have they had to make? How many retractions have they had to make? How many apologies have they had to make?
I have to say I find it really odd that your issue seems to be that these stories are being reported not that they exist in the first place. Why is that?
Not that I am aware of, but I did see him quoted on here as a celebrity fan and he did find it funny.
I'll throw that straight back at you. How is it going to hinder? Is it wrong to tell them how we feel as a supporter base even if the timetable for them leaving is already set?
That's your fantasy not mine.
You never did answer this either Nick. I think its a very valid set of questions. Perhaps you'll be good enough to address them?
Coventry City are top of one league table and it could pay off
To be fair it was inside a football ground involving CCFC so not likely to haplen with you.
Like I said. Your fantasy.
Has he been unfortunate to meet you twice?Careful - you will make Tony jealous.
Seen he came off a banning order recently.Is hadji still with us I haven't seen him for a while I wonder if I still have him blocked
It's highlighted what a fuck up our club is and how it's effected the fan base. How is that wrong?
There is nothing wrong with highlighting things, dragging out a 2 line quote from an ex player where they say they don't know much about the situation into 2 articles isn't just highlighting the situation is it?
Surely the way to go about it is to stick to facts, do digging to find out more facts rather than just dangle things in front of people and let them make their own minds up as it is obvious which way it is going to go. I
How is that kicking the club?
Who is the negativity they promote going to affect, SISU or CCFC? Of course people will be angry, but how much of that is from reading articles stirring it up all week and having the PSB group propaganda put in front of them like it's fact? (You would think most newspapers would have a read through rather than just copy and paste, so I'd see why they
Oh, they never did mention the Tifosy stuff did they? Even offered to donate to charity twice over if they did a nice little piece about that (nobody can disagree with that, it isn't political) but people in Hull who haven't put any money onto their gas / electric takes precedence.
Surely the fact that the stories exist is that someone else is kicking the club? Or are the telegraph just making these stories up?
Yes, there are stories that are made up out of nothing.
How many corrections have they had to make?
They dont usually make corrections, they just ignore it when people point it out.
There was a story earlier where it said about SISU planning a bonus or something for playing young players, it was left for a bit and then edited.
View attachment 6061
It has now been changed to:
There is this article:
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/sp...-news/coventry-city-digest-sky-blues-12294362
That prompted this:
There was the article about the fella who apparently travelled 5000 miles to boycott and hadn't been to a game for over a year, turns out he was in the country for his 50th and had been to the game that week. It didnt get corrected.
Articles are full of inaccuracies and if they get pointed out, then they don't care because people like you will just shout conspiracy. That is just a couple I can think of that are fresh.
How many retractions have they had to make? How many apologies have they had to make?
See above, they don't care because they just say SISU out and people believe everything. Why would they need to retract things? The club's historian has told them an article is incorrect but it stays the same. They are only bothered about clicks.
I have to say I find it really odd that your issue seems to be that these stories are being reported not that they exist in the first place. Why is that?
I have no issue with facts being reported, pushing shit from people like the PSB group and that dodgy photoshop from Jimmy Hills Way just goes to show it isn't just about "keeping people informed".
It has been shown it isn't just about reporting facts and stories, it is going way beyond that isn't it?
I have had more correspondence in the last month or so from the trust with a picture of Gilbert's book in than I have for a while. They are also a "double team" now apparently, stuff like that isn't going to really do much is it?
Back to the point, it is all about agendas. In my opinion the Trust want to run the club, they see the SCG as a step to that so they want to run the SCG to get one step closer. Strange is already there, he acts like he is a football team owner and gives it the big I am when he has no power what so ever. He doesn't want the Trust to get his "power". If the SCG is so pointless, the trust wouldn't have been so outraged and bothered when they didn't get voted as the next chairperson.
Tony asked me to.answer his questions..Nick, you have an unhealthy obsession with the CT
to be fair, you were straight into the CT on page one.
You give them more publicity. I just ignore them
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?