Broken Hearted Sky Blue
Well-Known Member
It was only so that all the recipients could understand it
It was only so that all the recipients could understand itLooks like it's written by a 2 year old. :slap:
It was only so that all the recipients could understand it
Lighten up nick it was an attempt at humour obviously a poor oneSo the members are all special?
Lighten up nick it was an attempt at humour obviously a poor one
From Oct 15th 2012 meeting minutes:
"It was agreed that SB would purchase a tenor drum with the intention of getting the Sky Blue Trust logo printed on it for a volunteer member to play on behalf of the Trust at future CCFC matches at the Ricoh."
This is for real? No wonder the only people who are even attempting to defend these clowns on this forum are people who claim they aren't members! What sort of moron supports such a group, yet wouldn't pay a pound to join?
Then you have a founder member of the clique making an attack, which could oh so easily be pointed at every single group member who posts on here with the obligatory "What have you done?" rubbish.
And yet these people not only want, but because Hoff/JE or P4 have apparently come out and said they would give 20% of the club so they expect it will be them! This should Never be allowede to happen. Why are the clique so opposed to a share issue for all fans? Could it be that it would make them officially defunct? But this would be great news for the club, it would guarantee fans are part of the club - which is their stated aim. I simply do not understand how giving away a part of the club to these people would benefit the fans. They do after all only represent at best 10% of the fanbase! So all it would do is give 20% of the club to 10% - and for free!
No wonder their top heavy group are so desperate to silence any criticism! However tonight has shown themselves up for what they really are. And isn't it noticeable that it has alienated the very people it claims to represent!
and all they have to defend them is the moron LAST. And with friends like that - who needs enemies! Even Grendel isn't impressed !
No wonder they were so desperate to try and silence me!
People gave £1 to join the Trust. Is that worth getting back just because you don't like their letter?
I back everything they've done. A few weeks ago I thought they were being too easy going with SISU. Now I feel like this is a cause I can get behind.
SISU out.
They have little influence.
Therefore they have to have a working relationship with the club especially as they do not even have the majority of fans on board.
Taking a stance against the club could end any influence they have.
For someone so opinionated Grendle, you really do just bend over and take whatever SISU want to give you.
In fact you welcome it.
Well done Mr Fisher wot be long before your trolls have completed your dirty work:claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands::claping hands:
Unfortunately you sound very foolish.
If you have disagreements with other parties in power you have to negotiate. You cannot win by dropping bombs on them all the time.
The primary objective has to be to play in Coventry. That needs to be achieved first and anything else dealt with later.
The trust has a relatively small membership - at least 80% of fans who attend matches are not members. Organisations that alienate themselves from the main body they seek to influence ultimately will fail.
You lack concept and you lack reality. No one supports the owners but they are the owners so you have to seek to mould their behaviour as best you can.
If you are suggesting that its "sisu trolls" that have come on here to criticise the trust , then you are way off the mark
You'll see its actually long standing members, many of whom were previously vocal in their support if the trust, who are now saying they are dissatisfied with the trust - which is supposed to represent us, it's members and the Coventry city fan base.
It also seems that many of us have related our comments directly to the trust, some of us have even offered help, to which we haven't even had a reply!
Taking all the above into consideration , it could appear that maybe the trust isn't performing as it should be, or representing its members in the way it proclaims to... Some would even say its totally ignoring its members and just carrying on in a way which the few people running it seem fit.. A power trip!
Not consulting with its members , making decisions and telling a its members after the event, not listing to its members feedback... Sound familiar guys?
I understand the criticism. They should simply organise a poll on the website for things like this, one that only members can access by logging in.
In this instance they've echoed my thoughts on what needs to be done, so I'm not being too critical; but certainly they need to make sure people feel a part of the decision making process.
To be fair that response was a bit shit.
I've said it already but I'll say it again Organisations that take money from the general public are accountable if no money changes hands then they can say what they like but they have taken money so I will have my say
Agreed, lets all put a bit more in and then perhaps we'll get a bit more out. oh I forgot everyone is still up in arms at the fact it cost £1 to join.....take money from the general public.....priceless. I guess the amount we put in should define how proffesional the organistation has to be.....oh hang on that means that SISU and ACL should be bastions of proffesionalism
Exactly! You can even set up voting polls on Facebook these days.. So they wouldnt even need to trawl through email replies. It would take them 5 mins to set up & 5 seconds to see the results. Then they go with the majority.
Not only would it be easy to do.. But it would give them the perfect response and back up evidence for its members, should a member not be happy with a particular decision "we went with the majority"
To be fair I did suggest this but again no interest, much rather get people emailing yes or no in an email...
Yeah because that way nobody else can see the results we just have to take their word for it
To be fair I did suggest this but again no interest, much rather get people emailing yes or no in an email...
If you are suggesting that its "sisu trolls" that have come on here to criticise the trust , then you are way off the mark
You'll see its actually long standing members, many of whom were previously vocal in their support if the trust, who are now saying they are dissatisfied with the trust - which is supposed to represent us, it's members and the Coventry city fan base.
It also seems that many of us have related our comments directly to the trust, some of us have even offered help, to which we haven't even had a reply!
Taking all the above into consideration , it could appear that maybe the trust isn't performing as it should be, or representing its members in the way it proclaims to... Some would even say its totally ignoring its members and just carrying on in a way which the few people running it seem fit.. A power trip some might say!
Not consulting with its members , making decisions and telling a its members after the event, not listing to its members feedback... All traits of SISU, and all things the trust has been very critical of the club for. you'd think they'd be top of the agenda for the trust in running their organisation then?
You need to get a fucking life Paul. You're full of shit and hot air.
All the armchair trust mockers unite.
Motto
DO FA, MOAN a lot, and cant afford a pound
if they are so disenchanted, why not form their own group...will be interesteing to see how many members they get, or how many turn up to activities etc
sorry, it is your persistant knocking of people trying to get a result that is getting tedious...jog on
and why do you care?That argument don't wash with me I'm sorry to say, they have clearly lost the sisu out battle and now they have put themselves in a position where sisu will never work with them if they had played a better game and held all party's to account then maybe sisu would have let them in on the board in the future but they've not acted appropriately so that's never going to happen now
The more you reply the more I understand that you are a complete moron with little intelligence and possibly a board member, trust me you will be held to account. That is all
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?