League one clubs transfer income/outgoing's summer 16/17 (1 Viewer)

steve82 · Sep 1, 2016

MK Dons • income 0 • spent undis
Bolton • income 2.5m • spent 0
Walsall • income 2.2m • spent 310k
Millwall • income 0 • spent 0
Scunthorpe • income 0 • spent 0
Gillingham • income 0 • spent 0
Rochdale • income 0 • spent 0
Port vale • income 0 • spent 0
Bury • income undisclosed • spent 0
Swindon • income 850k • spent 400k
Southend • income 0 • spent 0
Oldham • income 0 • spent 50k
Chesterfield • income 0 • spent 0
Fleetwood • income 0 • spent 0
Shrewsbury • income 0 • spent 0
Oxford • income 4m • spent undis
Bristol rovers • income 0 • spent 0
Wimbledon • income 250k • spent 0
Bradford • income 0 • spent £1+ vincelot fee
Northampton • income undis • spent undis
Sold Ricky Holmes got Harry beautyman
Peterborough • income undis • spent 0
Sold Harry beautyman
Charlton • income 4.9m • spent 1.1m + undis
Ricky Holmes
Sheff Utd • income 3.4m • spent ? L.clark, C.lavery, C.Hussy, S.Moore, J.O'Connell undisclosed
Coventry • income undis • spent undis
Sold vincelot got JJ, Turnbull.
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/league-one/transfers/wettbewerb/GB3/saison_id/2016

Skyblueweeman · Sep 1, 2016

Very interesting that nice one.

"But all our competitors are spending money and we're not...."

Lol.

steve82 · Sep 1, 2016

Skyblueweeman said:
Very interesting that nice one.

"But all our competitors are spending money and we're not...."

Lol.

Yes, hence why i looked into exactly what we're missing out on. Seems mainly charlton are the ones to buy with intent on Nicky adjose and josh Magennis. Over 1million.
Reality is we spent in line with the rest of the league.

shmmeee · Sep 1, 2016

It's the clubs fault. They went overboard trying to justify the Madders sale as some great piece of business that would allow us to push on, when one reality it was just meeting bills after they fucked up the budgeting.

It's hardly a surprise a bunch of fans are wondering where our new team of players bought with the Madders cash is.

shy_tall_knight · Sep 1, 2016

Surprised Bristol Rovers have spent nothing thought that they were well funded.

steve82 · Sep 1, 2016

Just amended MK Dons, broke there club record for Kieran Agard.
No supprise both relegated sides invested

SkyBlueScottie · Sep 1, 2016

The more relevant question is players signed by each club in this window?

ccfc92 · Sep 1, 2016

shmmeee said:
It's the clubs fault. They went overboard trying to justify the Madders sale as some great piece of business that would allow us to push on, when one reality it was just meeting bills after they fucked up the budgeting.

It's hardly a surprise a bunch of fans are wondering where our new team of players bought with the Madders cash is.

No, no, no. It's definitely the fans fault.

ccfcway · Sep 1, 2016

Newcastle and villa income / spend is frightening in championship.

Parachute payments should be no more, clubs have more than enough equity in their players to sell one or two and survive, which after all, was what they payments were for.

Villa have a net -£33m spend this window. How can that be right ?

Hobo · Sep 1, 2016

Scunthorpe, Oldham, Oxford, Luton and Stevenage all spent undisclosed fees on final day.

But teams at this level spend mainly on wages....no such thing as a free lunch.

Hobo · Sep 1, 2016

ccfcway said:
Newcastle and villa income / spend is frightening in championship.

Parachute payments should be no more, clubs have more than enough equity in their players to sell one or two and survive, which after all, was what they payments were for.

Villa have a net -£33m spend this window. How can that be right ?

That is nothing to what Man Utd, Man City, Chelsea etc., are writing off each year.

I sometimes don't think I want Coventry back in top flight, our horrendous debt would barely buy a player let alone pay a wage!

ccfcway · Sep 1, 2016

Hobo said:
Scunthorpe, Oldham, Oxford, Luton and Stevenage all spent undisclosed fees on final day.

But teams at this level spend mainly on wages....no such thing as a free lunch.

and agents

higgs · Sep 1, 2016

Hobo said:
That is nothing to what Man Utd, Man City, Chelsea etc., are writing off each year.

I sometimes don't think I want Coventry back in top flight, our horrendous debt would barely buy a player let alone pay a wage!

Will we ever see them days again

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

fernandopartridge · Sep 1, 2016

shmmeee said:
It's the clubs fault. They went overboard trying to justify the Madders sale as some great piece of business that would allow us to push on, when one reality it was just meeting bills after they fucked up the budgeting.

It's hardly a surprise a bunch of fans are wondering where our new team of players bought with the Madders cash is.

The Maddison money may well in part cover fees for Turnbull & Jones and helped cover running costs. That's fine.

League one clubs transfer income/outgoing's summer 16/17 (1 Viewer)

steve82

Well-Known Member

Skyblueweeman

Well-Known Member

steve82

Well-Known Member

shmmeee

Well-Known Member

shy_tall_knight

Well-Known Member

steve82

Well-Known Member

SkyBlueScottie

Well-Known Member

ccfc92

Well-Known Member

ccfcway

Well-Known Member

Hobo

Well-Known Member

Hobo

Well-Known Member

ccfcway

Well-Known Member

higgs

Well-Known Member

fernandopartridge

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

League one clubs transfer income/outgoing's summer 16/17 (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency