dongonzalos
Well-Known Member
Yep I agree, however ask yourself
why is she sending a message to potential investors
Joy only comments when she has to!
Don't kid yorself, the recent interview was for the fans!
It was aimed for the legals & at potential investors!
I don't think you can say protests are proving ineffective
SISU will never turn around and admit that.
They will just start doing things they don't normally do ......
Have said many times before, as have others, that this is a war of attrition. I think we'll really see the effect NOPM is having after the judicial review appeal verdict. Should then become apparent, pending outcome obviously, which of the two parties has the financial ammo to prevail.
In the meantime, it does seem a bit curious that Sisu have suddenly started to engage in a PR campaign. An attempt to belatedly engage the hearts and minds of the fans perhaps, the vast majority of whom can see the Gobshites for what they are...
Lived in Coventry, Wyken for many years before moving. Very anti CCC for not doing enough to bring the team back. They insisted previously that they will not sell the Ricoh to anyone. They along will many other Councils continue to cut funding to numerous areas whilst holding on to a Stadium which is losing money or maybe breaking even if you believe ACL, (I do nt). Selling the Ricoh to anyone will bring funds that the Council could use. I do nt support selling it to SiSu or any one else cheaply but I do nt see how they can justify not selling it. What are they actually getting out of it ? I m pretty sure that an extra 20 ,30, 40 million pounds or more raised by its sale could be put to better use that tied up in a white elephant of a Stadium. Only my opinion of course and a bit political.
SISU/ACL/CCC out.
Pusb
Markets dictate prices. Apart from CCFC, who is in the market to play at the Ricoh?
Didn't Seppala say she wanted set a price on the freehold based on the average of the valuation from both CCC's and sisu's chosen experts?
Yep I agree, however ask yourself
why is she sending a message to potential investors
Probably because ccfc assisted ntfc with legals?ACL were trying to bully / scare Northampton.
There was never any chance of it succeeding legally.
Luckily for CCFC, Northampton were not going to fall for it.
ACL were trying to bully / scare Northampton.
There was never any chance of it succeeding legally.
Luckily for CCFC, Northampton were not going to fall for it.
Same could be said of the Judicial review:ACL were trying to bully / scare Northampton.
There was never any chance of it succeeding legally.
Luckily for CCFC, Northampton were not going to fall for it.
ACL were trying to bully / scare Northampton.
There was never any chance of it succeeding legally.
Luckily for CCFC, Northampton were not going to fall for it.
Club should never have signed the shoddy Ricoh deal
Only the legals benefit!
Thought Acl got paid same regardless if they accepted the CVA?
Only what they are owed, not the value of the lease that the stadium agreement was based on.
Yep which I think is what was offered in the cva
So you want the club to have to pay it all back? Surely when you say 10s of millions it shows just how over priced it was.Still 10's of millions short of it's value.
So you want the club to have to pay it all back? Surely when you say 10s of millions it shows just how over priced it was.
So you want the club to have to pay it all back? Surely when you say 10s of millions it shows just how over priced it was.
Not directly, but at least buy the stadium or rent it, to contribute to what it cost.
After all CCC/HIGGS were instrumental in getting the club out the mess they created in regards of getting the Ricoh built. Without them we would have been left without a stadium to play in.
If ACL fold and SISU get it on the cheap will you be happy with that?
If ACL fold and CCFC get it on the cheap that would be great, but that option will never happen.
When you commit to put £100M into a project you want to be sure that you will get your money back.
Hence in committing the money they tied the club up with a lease. The club were on the back foot but clearly so were ACL in the early years (based on their books) as they built up the Ricoh income streams. SISU knew this but the lease needed to be broken ........... the rest of the story you know.
If ACL fold and CCFC get it on the cheap that would be great.
When did the council contribute to our club?£100million??
The amount goes up day by day.
£10million was the council contribution.
No it wouldn't. That's the scenario where a bunch of extremely wealthy people get even more wealthy by taking money from taxpayers and a charity to help sick children.
MR01 29/06/2013 REGISTRATION OF A CHARGE / CHARGE CODE 044406840006
MR01 18/05/2013 REGISTRATION OF A CHARGE / CHARGE CODE 044406840005
MG01 22/01/2013 PARTICULARS OF A MORTGAGE OR CHARGE / CHARGE NO: 4
MG01 22/01/2013 PARTICULARS OF A MORTGAGE OR CHARGE / CHARGE NO: 3
£100million??
The amount goes up day by day.
£10million was the council contribution.
Is the higgs charity for sick children?
...or a High Court Judge...Same could be said of the Judicial review:
SISU were trying to bully / distress ACL
There was never any chance of it succeeding legally.
Luckily for ACL, Coventry Council was not going to fall for it.
Don't fully understand where the money came from but the stadium complex cost over 100M and that is a lot of money to tie up with no long term security.
Love to have a idiots guide to how the finances were found. People have tried to explain but I either did not understand or all the 'experts' confused me.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?