This is spot on. Trys to do too much every time. Count next match how many blind one touch passes he does infield to no one.
I don't really know how to word what I am about to say without it sounding like a criticism, but do we not think we are overplaying the Kelly factor just a little bit? We had a great run of form in that period he was playing but most the opposition were teams I would expect to get something out of. We beat Wycombe away, something we always tend to do, Rotherham at home, a result I imagine most of us would expect and Cardiff at home, which came off the back of a 3-2 home win against Reading without Kelly. We drew with Blues and Derby (both relegation rivals, good points all the same) and we got a good draw with Norwich who I believe had 7 players out at the time. I don't want this to come across at all like I don't like/rate Kelly, I do, but I am not as confident he is the lord and saviour some are thinking he is to our play. The guy we have replaced him with (James), is considerably more accomplished than Kelly. I tend to think our form issues are stemmed from much bigger factors than Kelly being out
I agree James is an all-round more accomplished player, but some players have more about them than physical and technical attributes. Their presence on the pitch - hence why he is captain. He is not a shouter which is probably a good thing with such a young team. He leads by example and sets the pace. A past leader who was a quiet captain and lead by example was Trevor Peake.I don't really know how to word what I am about to say without it sounding like a criticism, but do we not think we are overplaying the Kelly factor just a little bit? We had a great run of form in that period he was playing but most the opposition were teams I would expect to get something out of. We beat Wycombe away, something we always tend to do, Rotherham at home, a result I imagine most of us would expect and Cardiff at home, which came off the back of a 3-2 home win against Reading without Kelly. We drew with Blues and Derby (both relegation rivals, good points all the same) and we got a good draw with Norwich who I believe had 7 players out at the time. I don't want this to come across at all like I don't like/rate Kelly, I do, but I am not as confident he is the lord and saviour some are thinking he is to our play. The guy we have replaced him with (James), is considerably more accomplished than Kelly. I tend to think our form issues are stemmed from much bigger factors than Kelly being out
What is the latest on Kelly when it comes to return timespan?
Because Kelly is injury proneSo why have we signed Matty James?
I don't really know how to word what I am about to say without it sounding like a criticism, but do we not think we are overplaying the Kelly factor just a little bit? We had a great run of form in that period he was playing but most the opposition were teams I would expect to get something out of. We beat Wycombe away, something we always tend to do, Rotherham at home, a result I imagine most of us would expect and Cardiff at home, which came off the back of a 3-2 home win against Reading without Kelly. We drew with Blues and Derby (both relegation rivals, good points all the same) and we got a good draw with Norwich who I believe had 7 players out at the time. I don't want this to come across at all like I don't like/rate Kelly, I do, but I am not as confident he is the lord and saviour some are thinking he is to our play. The guy we have replaced him with (James), is considerably more accomplished than Kelly. I tend to think our form issues are stemmed from much bigger factors than Kelly being out
Because Kelly is injury prone
Unfortunately the budget dictatedIt’s not hindsight. We had these issues before January and they should have been addressed.
And just as a balance count how many 1 touch passes find the target tooThis is spot on. Trys to do too much every time. Count next match how many blind one touch passes he does infield to no one.
James Kelly Hamer is the 3 I would opt forI see no reason why Kelly, Sheaf and Hamer couldn't play together, either as a three with O'Hare in front or with Sheaf and Kelly a bit deeper and Hamer slightly more advanced to try and do more playing in the strikers. He's also not afraid to have a pop at goal.
How to fit all of them and James in does become a question if Kelly gets fit, with my preference being the experience of James and Kelly and Sheaf dropping to the bench.
Yes and bring on sheaf when the legs begin to tireJames Kelly Hamer is the 3 I would opt for
Would expect him on the bench tomorrowWhat is the latest on Kelly when it comes to return timespan?
Why would you want a tired Sheaf on?Yes and bring on sheaf when the legs begin to tire
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
I don't want to know what he was doing on the bench if his legs are tired!!!Why would you want a tired Sheaf on?
Oh, I do like a good conspiracy.Has anybody thought that maybe Robins signed James so we don’t sign Sheaf?
Sheaf has to hit certain milestones for us to make his contract with us permanent, maybe one of them is the amount of games. Perhaps Robins thought Sheaf doesn’t cut the mustard so brought in James so he doesn’t have to take up signing Sheaf
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Has anybody thought that maybe Robins signed James so we don’t sign Sheaf?
Sheaf has to hit certain milestones for us to make his contract with us permanent, maybe one of them is the amount of games. Perhaps Robins thought Sheaf doesn’t cut the mustard so brought in James so he doesn’t have to take up signing Sheaf
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No.
Since James arrived:
Norwich: Sheaf started, James came on
Reading: James started, Sheaf came on
Wednesday: Both started
Brum: Both started
Forest: Both started
Watford: Sheaf injured
Cardiff: Sheaf unused, though just back from injury.
Thanks for the useful info
I really not sold so far on Sheaf, his performances haven’t wow’d me yet
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Has anybody thought that maybe Robins signed James so we don’t sign Sheaf?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I don't think that Kelly would just 'accept' a lesser role, he's not that kind of bloke. I'm sure he would fight tooth and nail to win back the shirt.No. Different type of player & have played together more often than not.
James was to cover Kelly's injury but end of season could be interesting if we manage to take James permanently. Would Kelly accept a lesser role?
He's been our most understated player for a very very long time.
You are not suggesting Saddlebrains is understating the understated are you?You only think that because you cannot remember all the players who were much more understated.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?