http://www.gmkonline.com/?page=forum&forum_id=6&thread_id=35010
If you read this it gives food for thought.
Again my personal view is, having the Trust in the middle working in the background trying to engage with both ACL/CCC/AHT & SISU whilst these independent groups from either side peacefully get their message across could work well.
Another question: when will this group hold a similar protest towards the club? If they don't are they not just as guilty of imbalance as they accuse all previous groups of being? Or will the argument be that "that's what those other groups are for"?
How do you know they haven't protested against the club either through the march or through NOPM?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
I got the impression this was a brand new group, set up because of the failings of other groups to be neutral. Just saying that this message is hardly neutral, what do they want from the other side?
How do you know they haven't protested against the club either through the march or through NOPM?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
Explain to me again what they have done wrong? From the perspective of a company running a stadium complex.
Are you in the game of discussing an issue or just winning points on the Internet?
Wonder if the writer pays his taxes to CCC?
Les Reids article says "about 50 fans" and is illustrated by a picture of 25 fans.
More bias.
I could be going crazy and I know its a longshot but maybe not everyone was in the picture?Les Reids article says "about 50 fans" and is illustrated by a picture of 25 fans.
More bias.
Maybe their next act should be to hold a protest outside ARVO offices, hand in a petition, and ask for the following:-
We call on ARVO to conduct a survey of the impact on the their balance sheet of losing its management fees from the football club (a) temporarily over up to five years, and (b) permanently, if a new stadium is built in Warwickshire and few supporters attend (this assumes of course that the £10million + fees will actually reduce?)
We call on ARVO to explain to fans what exactly did these fees cover.
We call on ARVO to explain their business plan to continue or increase these fees without Otium utilising the Ricoh Arena.
Does anyone actually know what these fees were for? £10 million seems an awful lot of money to me. The rent wasn't much different and we have had 100's of threads about that. How come this has not been as big a subject for discussion?
Was this it? 25 at the most.
Now is it:
A) Because I just want to see the Sky Blues back in Coventry
B) Because I support SISU.
If it's B then you sir are wrong
Are you in the game of discussing an issue or just winning points on the Internet?
Was this it? 25 at the most.
There are EXACTLY the same amount of people in this as there are in that Ryton
protest photo posted to prove how "pathetic" that protest was. Les Reid has been on the beers if he thinks there's 50 people there, double vision.
I reckon Grendel is front row second in from the right !!!!
all the protests have failed miserably. We're still playing in Northampton. The only one that deserves credit is the march.
Sounds like the feedback we get from Hill.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse and spelling or grammar errors
That's why I say we have to rethink this, and to take the protest inside the stadium is a suggestion...pack it to the rafters, have hundreds unable to get in, stretch police and security resourses, make a lot of noise, attract the right kind of focus, and show sisu we mean business!!! Just as a one off...anyone else got any bright ideas before you shoot me down in flames??? Let me add that I will only go to sixfields if I'm part of such a protest!!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?