shmmeee
Well-Known Member
That’s my guess too.
Guessing Doyle or Panzo at LCB then and Rose on the right.
DoyleOut of the two who do we prefer Panzo or Doyle ?
Much like Panzo vis-à-vis the player he’s supposed to be marking - it’s not even close.Out of the two who do we prefer Panzo or Doyle ?
Isn't that the production crew on a film set? Set people.Seems a threat in the air on attacking set people, lets hope he can sort out our problems with defending them
Much like Panzo vis-à-vis the player he’s supposed to be marking - it’s not even close.
Thought he did really well in a game recently when given a clear job to man mark someone actually. He’s definitely improved from earlier on.
Hes nowhere near good enough at this level as it stands. In years to come maybe if someone sticks with him but he’s really poor
Really? You never mention it.
Opta stats have him as our 4th best performer this season behind hamer vik and fadzHes nowhere near good enough at this level as it stands. In years to come maybe if someone sticks with him but he’s really poor
Opta stats have him as our 4th best performer this season behind hamer vik and fadz
Yes as cal has only played 11 matcheslol better than o hare?
Yes as cal has only played 11 matches
According to the opta data he's our 4th best performers in the leagueSo he’s better than Doyle Bidwell Allen and Sheaf?
Come on G, I don't think Panzo is brilliant but he has played his part in the good as well as the bad defensively this season. The number of clean sheets to date attests that.
Yeah I meant pieces, damn autocorrectIsn't that the production crew on a film set? Set people.
Or do mean those in jelly?
lol better than o hare?
He’s so poor at man marking and defensive cover. He’s fine when he’s on the ball and moving forward but of the defenders available to me he’s bottom of the pile as he’s just high risk all the time and has real lapses in concentration in key moments
Agree with most of this tbh.
There's clearly a player in there & he could be a real asset in time, but his tendency to ball watch & let attackers run off him is a huge weakness at the moment. This wouldn't be such an issue if he was our player as he will be learning from these mistakes but that's really only going to benefit his parent club (or next buyer in the future).
You could argue from the stats that teams target Panzo and Doyle, hence why they have to contest more duels, have to make more tackles and interceptions. Interesting to see when they do target Rose on the floor his ground duels win % is far superior to both Panzo and Fadz. Probably Doyle too.Panzo and Doyle similar stats , Rose is the weak defensive link based on stats
Fadz just continues to amaze , best of the lot
It is, and I hope we do shop in that market. But given Robins has said we're not awash with money I don't think we can be dropping 5 mill in a window and then still have some money leftover for the following window.But that’s the market if we want to challenge at the top end of the division we have to shop in
Hes nowhere near good enough at this level as it stands.
I think he's a good footballer but lacks intelligence, bit harsh but there you go. I suspect his game intelligence will improve with time and I wouldn't be against signing him if he didn't cost too much.Agree with most of this tbh.
There's clearly a player in there & he could be a real asset in time, but his tendency to ball watch & let attackers run off him is a huge weakness at the moment. This wouldn't be such an issue if he was our player as he will be learning from these mistakes but that's really only going to benefit his parent club (or next buyer in the future).
If you look at Gyokeres goal return with and without o'hare, its quite stark.O’Hare hasn’t been great in the limited time he’s played TBH. It’s understandable as he was coming back from injury, but he’s been nowhere near as effective this season as he was last.
Can’t see that it’s been confirmed, but it looks pretty hopeful.Has he signed yet tho?
losing games while he was injured, winning games when he was fit, losing games now he's injured again. There is no argument that we are a totally different (and rather boring) team without him.O’Hare hasn’t been great in the limited time he’s played TBH. It’s understandable as he was coming back from injury, but he’s been nowhere near as effective this season as he was last.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?