Macdonald (1 Viewer)

shepardo01

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #1

Heard last week that If Macdonald scores again it triggers
certain bonus payments that the club currently cannot afford. Heard something similar about mcseffrey and appearances (despite the restructured bonus payments which are to do with starting games) Also heard today that final three are Wilder, Brown and Ince. (First two and last one separate sources, but from inside the game) also know what bottom line figure the council/acl will be willing to accept for rent. It is in line with LG 1 rent figure, the figure HAS been mentioned so I don't know why this hasn't been agreed yet. I have also been told that the Ricoh can survive without Ccfc and that there IS other interest in using the stadium. Despite the spin from the forum on Thursday things off the pitch still seem pretty dire.... and things on it are worse.

 

stupot07

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #2

Didnt the telegraph or it may have been the fans forum say that all bar 1 player has agreed to new contract terms?

 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #3

The telegraph gets a LOT wrong. Almost everything they have written about the rent negotiations has been wrong so far.....pure speculation. The new bonus agreements were to do with starting eleven and appearance bonuses.

 

T

The CableGuy

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #4

shepardo01 said:

I have also been told that the Ricoh can survive without Ccfc

Click to expand...

Hope you didn't pay your source, that's been common public knowledge for ages now.

 

WillenhallSkyBlues

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #5

doesnt matter if it triggers a payment or not, even if he played every minute of every game youd still be waiting a while to see that goal!

 

Gray

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #6

So does this mean every time cody comes on they tell him not to score?

 

J

jabharty

Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #7

But wouldn't they rather pay the bugger, get promotion and get prize money than be relegated and have more money in the short term?
What an odd 'business' SISU run.

 

Ccfc1979

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #8

Gray said:

So does this mean every time cody comes on they tell him not to score?

Click to expand...

This has to be rubbish. He could have scored last time he played and then that would've been it triggered!

 

B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #9

Don't understand why he's being frozen out of the team even if that's the reason being given. The only player we spend any money on and it's proving to be a total waste of cash :facepalm:

 

C

CovFan

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #10

McDonald has scored 6 goals for us so far so is it a payment to the player or Norwich themselves?

 

S

Sky Blue M

New Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #11

Why would there be a trigger for him scoring his sixth (I think) goal for us

 

ccfcway

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #12

yer, it triggers if he scores 7 goals in first 2 years

clearly norwich had as much faith in his as Shaw

 

C

CCFC_Charlie

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #13

This is such bull, he's started twice since his last goal.

 

stupot07

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #14

To be honest I don't buy it. He's been dropped because they believe Elliot is a better foil for McGoldrick and do the majority of the work up top, run the channels etc.

 

shepardo01

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #15

It's honestly what I've been told. May have been slightly miscommunicated but it is to do with certain bonuses.

 

Nonleagueherewecome

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #16

But not willing to pay a meagre add-on feee for Cody doesn't square with are willing to pay compo for Wilder, does it? Unless Wilder doesn't want Cody, and seeing as he wanted to sign him for Oxford in the past, we can assume he does.

 

B

Brighton Sky Blue

Well-Known Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #17

Don't see what Wilder would have to do with it when he's not been appointed. I think it's more likely that Shaw is simply clueless.

 

S

stevo_ccfc

New Member

• Sep 15, 2012

• #18

Why on earth would you have such an odd number of goals on a clause, 7 is ridiculous, this sounds like complete nonsense to me.