Sick Boy
Super Moderator
Those who support the Arena/ACL would not like that!
Not necessarily.
Potential sites identified, and commitments from stakeholders that they'd actively work to help a new ground happen as smoothly as possible would help immensely.
Not necessarily.
Potential sites identified, and commitments from stakeholders that they'd actively work to help a new ground happen as smoothly as possible would help immensely.
Not necessarily.
Potential sites identified, and commitments from stakeholders that they'd actively work to help a new ground happen as smoothly as possible would help immensely.
Those who support the Arena/ACL would not like that!
I admire your optimism NW but if SISU haven't managed to do that since the day they first muted the idea it ain't going to happen going forward. The cost of doing it will far outweigh the monetary value added to the club.
Is there no way around FFP if owners want to put money in?
Bournemouth just for example?
No, that's incorrect. Loans are not counted towards turnover (and therefore FFP), They have to inject equity, that counts towards turnover then 60% of turnover can be used.They can put money in as a gift.
Any money put in as loan is counted in the calculation.
back on the radar.
Another bizarre thing is that some posters openly support us forming a partnership with yet another hedge fund...
.... because there is no other option.
So if SISU aren't building they're only chance of selling (again, aside from a deal on the "not real" debt) is if they make a long term commitment to renting at the Ricoh. So you really are going to have to get over it at some point.
After that draw today we cannot afford to drop many more points if we are to make the play-offs.
But if there's a potential owner at some point down the line who believes we need to own our stadium and is prepared to provide it (as happened with Brighton) then being signed up to a long term deal at the Ricoh could be a hinderance.
But if there's a potential owner at some point down the line who believes we need to own our stadium and is prepared to provide it (as happened with Brighton) then being signed up to a long term deal at the Ricoh could be a hinderance.
You're right.After that draw today we cannot afford to drop many more points if we are to make the play-offs.
Depends how long term. 10 years would be sensible and give the club some sense of stability. Stability is always going to make the club more attractive even if it's a miniscule amount.
It's got to be at least a 3-5 years rental while a new stadium is built, so not a hinderance.
Perfectly illustrates the problem. Neither a 3-5 or 10 year agreement would be of much value for a potential owner who sees the Ricoh as the long term option but the longer the agreement put in place the more off putting it will be for someone who doesn't see our future at the Ricoh.
But if there's a potential owner at some point down the line who believes we need to own our stadium and is prepared to provide it (as happened with Brighton) then being signed up to a long term deal at the Ricoh could be a hinderance.
Perfectly illustrates the problem. Neither a 3-5 or 10 year agreement would be of much value for a potential owner who sees the Ricoh as the long term option but the longer the agreement put in place the more off putting it will be for someone who doesn't see our future at the Ricoh.
The only thing stopping an owner from buying this club is Sisu wanting to get 'their' money back by packaging up the club with a stadium.
Any buyer wanting a club and a stadium has a choice to build a new stadium if the Ricoh is not available.
It's got to be at least a 3-5 years rental while a new stadium is built, so not a hinderance.
A stadium takes 5 years from drawing board to moving in, so have a 5 year rolling deal.
It's not rocket science.
A stadium takes 5 years from drawing board to moving in, so have a 5 year rolling deal.
The sale of the Ricoh to Wasps has left is in an incredibly difficult position when it comes to getting rid of SISU and attracting new owners.
Sadly some aren't able to see this and see getting one over on sisu as more important. I've seen posters on this forum admit they hate sisu more than their love of the club.
Perfectly illustrates the problem. Neither a 3-5 or 10 year agreement would be of much value for a potential owner who sees the Ricoh as the long term option but the longer the agreement put in place the more off putting it will be for someone who doesn't see our future at the Ricoh.
Sadly some aren't able to see this and see getting one over on sisu as more important. I've seen posters on this forum admit they hate sisu more than their love of the club.
Of course you have. Cough...bullshit...cough cough.
I've got italia bingo
Perfectly illustrates the problem. Neither a 3-5 or 10 year agreement would be of much value for a potential owner who sees the Ricoh as the long term option but the longer the agreement put in place the more off putting it will be for someone who doesn't see our future at the Ricoh.
Sadly some aren't able to see this and see getting one over on sisu as more important. I've seen posters on this forum admit they hate sisu more than their love of the club.
They have no plan B so they need to leave and give someone else a chance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?