Manager watch (1 Viewer)

martcov · Oct 2, 2016

Grendel said:
Amazing what one win does. People said the same about Richard shaw after his first game in charge.

Most signings have been dross over the last two seasons.

Even Jones, who must have cost a reasonable sum, looks a concern.

Most signings, apart from Jones and possibly a couple of others, have not been the targets - as Mowbray explained.

Richard Shaw wasn't on the board and had not been as much involved as MV who was TMs partner when he came.

That said, one win hasn't altered the structure of the club.

I would still stick with Venus. We cannot do much anyway outside of the transfer window and a complete new start would take us back to square one, whereas Venus could carry on where Mowbray left off.

Give him until the end of the season - whatever happens.

stupot07 · Oct 2, 2016

Otis said:
Yep, it's just one win. It means nowt.

Not at all the time to be anything like getting carried away, even if we win 2-3 more games in a row.

Yep, as happy as I am with yesterday's victory, it is just an isolated win at the minute, I'm not sure why people are getting carried away.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Esoterica · Oct 2, 2016

Grendel said:
Amazing what one win does. People said the same about Richard shaw after his first game in charge.

Most signings have been dross over the last two seasons.

Even Jones, who must have cost a reasonable sum, looks a concern.

Don't be concerned over an 18 year old in his first full season in the League One, in his first year away from his home town and carrying an injury for several weeks of this season!

martcov · Oct 2, 2016

stupot07 said:
Yep, as happy as I am with yesterday's victory, it is just an isolated win at the minute, I'm not sure why people are getting carried away.

I would have been for Venus even if we had lost for the reasons I have stated.

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Otis · Oct 2, 2016

If it is Venus it will be for reasons of cheapness and nowt else.

The talk is of consistency with the club. Consistency of us keeping on losing then?

Grendel · Oct 2, 2016

martcov said:
Most signings, apart from Jones and possibly a couple of others, have not been the targets - as Mowbray explained.

Richard Shaw wasn't on the board and had not been as much involved as MV who was TMs partner when he came.

That said, one win hasn't altered the structure of the club.

I would still stick with Venus. We cannot do much anyway outside of the transfer window and a complete new start would take us back to square one, whereas Venus could carry on where Mowbray left off.

Give him until the end of the season - whatever happens.

Most of the permenant signings over the past two years were identified targets.

Esoterica · Oct 2, 2016

Otis said:
If it is Venus it will be for reasons of cheapness and nowt else.

The talk is of consistency with the club. Consistency of us keeping on losing then?

When they say consistency, it's all to save costs on the managers kit - we have to find someone else with the initials TM. Preferably called Tony too, so our players don't have to go through the trauma of learning someone else's name.

martcov · Oct 2, 2016

Otis said:
If it is Venus it will be for reasons of cheapness and nowt else.

The talk is of consistency with the club. Consistency of us keeping on losing then?

We are not losing consistently. We are not being outclassed - individual errors, not taking chances, ok. But we are not far off getting it together imo.

robbiekeane · Oct 2, 2016

Otis said:
Yep, it's just one win. It means nowt.

Not at all the time to be anything like getting carried away, even if we win 2-3 more games in a row.

We won 3 games in a row at the start of last season and had relegation form after that, and Mowbray was the messiah

Otis · Oct 2, 2016

martcov said:
We are not losing consistently. We are not being outclassed - individual errors, not taking chances, ok. But we are not far off getting it together imo.

I don't see it that way, mart, unfortunately. I see us once again lacking the physicality to compete on a consistent level.

I would say we need at least another 3 through the door (strong, physical types of player) before we can truly compete.

We look lightweight to me.

martcov · Oct 2, 2016

Otis said:
I don't see it that way, mart, unfortunately. I see us once again lacking the physicality to compete on a consistent level.

I would say we need at least another 3 through the door (strong, physical types of player) before we can truly compete.

We look lightweight to me.

When, where from and what with?

Otis · Oct 2, 2016

martcov said:
When, where from and what with?

Yep, too late now. TM messed up unfortunately.

martcov · Oct 2, 2016

Otis said:
Yep, too late now. TM messed up unfortunately.

Which he had the decency to admit. No point bringing in anyone yet as there is little that can be done on that front. Hence my view - give Venus the job to the end of the season. If that is a cheaper solution, then we have more budget at the next Transfer window.

Otis · Oct 2, 2016

martcov said:
Which he had the decency to admit. No point bringing in anyone yet as there is little that can be done on that front. Hence my view - give Venus the job to the end of the season. If that is a cheaper solution, then we have more budget at the next Transfer window.

Yep, get that logic.

All that is available now are out of contract players and they are surely going to be nowhere near match fit and will need a 'pre-season.'

Manager watch (1 Viewer)

martcov

Well-Known Member

stupot07

Well-Known Member

Esoterica

Well-Known Member

martcov

Well-Known Member

Otis

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Esoterica

Well-Known Member

martcov

Well-Known Member

robbiekeane

Well-Known Member

Otis

Well-Known Member

martcov

Well-Known Member

Otis

Well-Known Member

martcov

Well-Known Member

Otis

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Manager watch (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency