Someone said it’s about average, but I have no idea if that’s true.
But as Darren Moore said, this is a team 3 years in the making, it’s not about money signings, it’s about having a game plan, a structure and getting the right players to fit it. In other words, excellent football management.
course he is
Transmarkt is pure guesswork unfortunately.
It’s better than any rumour being thrown around on here.
Explain to me what part of this team is similar to that of last year, the year before or 3 years ago.
I’ll tell you the biggest single thing that’s similar- we win a lot more than we lose and we are chasing promotion every year. Which kind of takes us back to the original point, namely despite your protestations that Robins has had it “easy”, that his job is a “piece of piss” etc, he is doing something very few managers have ever been able to do with us.
It isn’t. As you have been told above, they are very wide of the mark with Godden.
So the squad isn’t similar then and you’re going off about something else
no they’re not, a ‘valuation’ is not a fact, it’s irrelevant when you’re seeing how much a team has actually spent, no?
no they’re not, a ‘valuation’ is not a fact, it’s irrelevant when you’re seeing how much a team has actually spent, no?
The site you are quoting has Godden down as a £45,000 player. Do you agree?
I’ll tell you the biggest single thing that’s similar- we win a lot more than we lose and we are chasing promotion every year. Which kind of takes us back to the original point, namely despite your protestations that Robins has had it “easy”, that his job is a “piece of piss” etc, he is doing something very few managers have ever been able to do with us.
So it tells you nothing about budget or expenditure then?
Matt Godden - Market value over timeNo it doesn’t, it says we bought him for £734,000 which is accurate. I don’t do all your guesswork, theories & guesses, I stick to facts.
expenditure, actual purchase yes. The rest- ‘valuations’ etc is for all these silly hypothetical arguments you keep trying to spew out.
So you can’t then. I was right, Darren Moore was talking shite.
Please quote me saying his job is ‘easy’ or a ‘piece of piss’
It’s better than any rumour being thrown around on here.
I agree with facts, the actual money that changed hands. You can use these fantasy valuations if you think it’s proving some kind of point if you like, knock yourself out.
I agree with facts, the actual money that changed hands. You can use these fantasy valuations if you think it’s proving some kind of point if you like, knock yourself out.
Kastaneer is worth more than Godden and his value has increased this month
like I said, I am talking real numbers, actual transfer fees, not these silly imaginary valuations you seem to love so much. If you can’t come up with a view without pointing at what ifs, maybes, nonsensical made up ‘valuations’, not much I can do to help you.
Basically you’re saying Robins has it easy, trying to justify the highly embarrassing “Taxi for Robins” standpoint, saying that his job is piss easy, the bar was set low, he’s done nothing etc etc, he has a big budget, and the mystery valuations of transfers that never happened are stripping away whatever credibility your views once had when we kicked off & you were saying Micky Adams was some kind of messiah- on that basis I’ll leave you to it
You call them fantasy valuations but the facts you are using are from the same site?
do I really have to put up with stupidity like this?
do I really have to put up with stupidity like this?
You’re giving facts out from transfermrkt.com while saying the exact same site is making up stuff
If The Sun tells you the fact that there is currently a virus in China, as does every other newspaper, but in the same issue The Sun tells you a load is rubbish, does that make the actual factual stuff incorrect?
Come on, you can’t be this silly :emoji_grin:
I’ll leave you to trawl the interweb trying to prove or disprove that we did, indeed, buy Matty Godden for £734k.What other sites have said the same then? You’ve only used one which has already been proven as not very reliable
Can you go back and answer my previous questions?
like I said, I am talking real numbers, actual transfer fees, not these silly imaginary valuations you seem to love so much. If you can’t come up with a view without pointing at what ifs, maybes, nonsensical made up ‘valuations’, not much I can do to help you.
Basically you’re saying Robins has it easy, trying to justify the highly embarrassing “Taxi for Robins” standpoint, saying that his job is piss easy, the bar was set low, he’s done nothing etc etc, he has a big budget, and the mystery valuations of transfers that never happened are stripping away whatever credibility your views once had when we kicked off & you were saying Micky Adams was some kind of messiah- on that basis I’ll leave you to it
The transfer fees are made up as well?
It has no fees at all for Kastaneer, Allen or Jobello however we paid undisclosed for all 3
I’ll leave you to trawl the interweb trying to prove or disprove that we did, indeed, buy Matty Godden for £734k.
Come back to me in a few days when you’ve done your research.
btw- your username is very apt apart from you put an L instead of an R
At this stage all I can do for you is to refer you to a dictionary which might enlighten you on what "undisclosed" means. Here's a hint- its not a number.
Definitely. So far, Robins has 2 achievements. Winning a Checkatrade final and coming 6th in league 2.
The Checkatrade final was a good win but it was a one off game.
The league 2 season wasn’t actually that great until we hammered Cheltenham. We were poor throughout lots of it and had some embarrassing results. You can’t rank this achievement as no other manager has ever had the chance to manage us in league 2. Specifically, when our budget dictates we should be one of the leagues best sides.
I love robins but he has had favourable circumstances.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?