I’m pretty sure if an acceptable offer was made it would be given up and the point really was the support that’s being given the support that’s not being given. I can’t believe I’m coming across as an apologist even though I am. We have to understand the position surely or there’s only upset and frustration. It’s not a bad place to be in. It’s just comes with caveats to what we can achieveThe person who took on stewardship of a football club without gun to their head. The same one who refuses to give up control to anyone else.
I’m pretty sure if an acceptable offer was made it would be given up
A friend of mine yep. And her opinion of them and his opinion of her really don’t match up with my feelings towards either. Yep acceptable is such a pejorative wordBy definition. Problem is that word acceptable.
To be clear I think we’ve done miles better since Joy became more involved as a club (though how much is Boddy/Robins I don’t know). But she knew what she was getting into (or should have), and will be perfectly happy to reap the rewards. She’s turned down several offers by all accounts (one yours).
Posters on here cry about our supporters not going to games and only going to Wembley does that sound familiar, well our owner is one, she has shown me nothing to suggest she cares.
A friend of mine yep. And her opinion of them and his opinion of her really don’t match up with my feelings towards either. Yep acceptable is such a pejorative word
Reckon we could afford him and Walsh?
Why is she basil fawlty is she not successful? She seems relatively successful in terms of profit and position. In any case the football club is all I am interested in not Sisu and not joy really although she’s pretty lovely on a purely personal level
How have people been taken in? The new stadium? Believing she cares about the football club? Can you be specific?
She doesnt care about the football club. She doesn’t even own it. She’s really lovely - is that some sort of joke?
She comes across as a nice person. Can only say it as I see it. Obviously only met her once and I've not dealt with her in a professional capacity, so can't comment on that. She's a human being, not a pantomime villain. Sorry.
She’s lovely
Queen of debt won't take no for an answer
But, according to rivals, appearances are deceptive. Seppala is a force to be reckoned with. “She has balls of steel,” said one. Seppala has a reputation for playing hardball in the distressed-debtwww.thetimes.co.uk
The last four on the pitch have been successful. We did once again end up playing outside of our city, this time for two years. If their first consideration is the football club, did they have to continue their legal shenanigans by referring the Ricoh sale to Europe? That seems to have brought them little reward and one way or another resulted in further fall outs with our landlords, something I am sure they would have predicted.I think the way the club has been run in the last 10 years has been chalk and cheese. The first 6 years was disastrous and the last 4 not at all
So what makes you think she doesn’t care about the football club?She doesnt care about the football club. She doesn’t even own it. She’s really lovely - is that some sort of joke?
No me neither although I’m struggling in the last 4 years. And I genuinely think the trust and respect boddy and robins have built it may be possible to push the break even plan even thought break even hasn’t really happenedThis is not to say I agree with every decision she's made regards our football club though.
I don’t agree with the Eu complaint but I understand the reasons for making it and I’m pretty certain that a deal was possible at the Ricoh and lots of individuals failed for us to end up in bham. And of course that includes Sisu and joy seppallaThe last four on the pitch have been successful. We did once again end up playing outside of our city, this time for two years. If their first consideration is the football club, did they have to continue their legal shenanigans by referring the Ricoh sale to Europe? That seems to have brought them little reward and one way or another resulted in further fall outs with our landlords, something I am sure they would have predicted.
It’s amazing how much a worm will turn. When the Trust has said things along these lines Grendull loses his shit because he loves a bit Trust bashing. Now he can use that to bash Robins he’ll repeat it like he thought it all along.Its nothing to do with the club being responsible its to do with the owners.
Have these owners by your definition been responsible in the last two seasons? Without COVID we would have had significant revenue reduction anyway and that is a deliberate strategy decision (a stupid one by a fairly hapless fund manager)
The term handouts is absurd. Not every club blows millions and also not every club tries (and in our case repeatedly fails) to remain cash neutral. The strategy is selling assets to fund annual losses and when that fails get loans to pay back with some hefty interest rates. Its hardly shrewd management.
This owner has no interest in the club other than paying back interest and capital to its fund owners. It has no care what division we are in and will just adjust accordingly to try and achieve that aim
It has a management team that seem to work within this better than they have done anywhere else so it certainly works for both parties but long term we would be far better having owners with a targeted vision for the club - not a means to pay back some anonymous investors.
The last four on the pitch have been successful. We did once again end up playing outside of our city, this time for two years. If their first consideration is the football club, did they have to continue their legal shenanigans by referring the Ricoh sale to Europe? That seems to have brought them little reward and one way or another resulted in further fall outs with our landlords, something I am sure they would have predicted.
I don’t disagree with the fundamental point that owners need to have a vision. I think that’s what I’d want too and if it’s not likely let’s move forward with alternative owners. But if no one will pay what is being asked for then we make the best of what we haveIt’s amazing how much a worm will turn. When the Trust has said things along these lines Grendull loses his shit because he loves a bit Trust bashing. Now he can use that to bash Robins he’ll repeat it like he thought it all along.
Still. I guess it’s easier than admitting that you were wrong about Robins. 4 seasons in a row.
Unfortunately nor do I. I cannot see any change for a few years they are settled with the strategy but lets forget the notion the woman who controls the funds has any interest in the club other than investment recovery.
So what makes you think she doesn’t care about the football club?
So you don’t know whether she does or not. OkBecause she doesn’t own the club and is a fund manager to a bunch of investors she needs to answer to. She’s not put one penny in and never will. Fine when we were trying to smash grab the Ricoh but that’s failed and now she’s nowhere to go
So you don’t know whether she does or not. Ok
You can’t change the parameters. I don’t base whether she cares about the club on a 90 min chat. Does her way of showing her care align with what you consider is best for ccfc, no! That’s not the same.Well a cost chat by the fire seems to have convinced you. Anyone who having failed once to smash grab the Ricoh - which as a strategy was fine - can’t have the supporters interests and heart if she then does it again can she?
If he had even a tiny shred of credibility left then it appears it will be gone by the end of this thread.It’s amazing how much a worm will turn. When the Trust has said things along these lines Grendull loses his shit because he loves a bit Trust bashing. Now he can use that to bash Robins he’ll repeat it like he thought it all along.
Still. I guess it’s easier than admitting that you were wrong about Robins. 4 seasons in a row.
So what has she done to show she cares?You can’t change the parameters. I don’t base whether she cares about the club on a 90 min chat. Does her way of showing her care align with what you consider is best for ccfc, no! That’s not the same.
About ccfc?So what has she done to show she cares?
So why is it untrue?Untrue. Not that it matters either way.
Surely James will be much more popular than Walsh?James I hope will sign I think Walsh will be too popular and another team will outbid us
Age is why I disagree mainly but you may be completely correct and we don’t get either because of itSurely James will be much more popular than Walsh?
That shows you she is trying to run a company better what has she done to show she cares.About ccfc?
Stopped spending money we didn’t generate
Listened to others who understand football and got robins back at the club
Made it clear to robins that she would support him with realism and followed through with it
Allowed boddy to make an agreement to return to a long term deal at the ricoh
to list a few football ones
She doesnt care about the football club. She doesn’t even own it. She’s really lovely - is that some sort of joke?
Cares about ????That shows you she is trying to run a company better what has she done to show she cares.
So what has she done to show she cares?
Care for the football club?
So says the moron who spends every day criticising, mocking and deriding our own players - for reasons unknown.
And has been on a 'one moron' campaign for the last 4 years on here to get rid of Robins - statistically our most successful manager in history.
That's real care for the football club isn't it - trying to derail our players and manager on a forum?
One thing SISU has got right is the appointment and backing of Robins - a bloke you have consistently tried to get rid of after 2-3 'poor' results. Thank f..k you're not running things.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?