He's using a charity line as it again destroys another one of his arguments.
It disguises the fact it was a bid and a bid far higher than it's worth. He clings to these pathetic one liners to try and worm his way out of the truth.
Which is what I always wanted. But can anyone honestly say that they think that SISU would have left our club when they still had a chance of getting the arena on the cheap?
Tell you what, I've this sneaking suspicion that this case is being financed by interests other than SISU, to open a back door for other compo cases from the government. This might explain the delay, because the judgement could have far reaching consequences.