It’s irrelevant. As usual you don’t like the answer so you’re moving the goalposts.
The only one who dribbled over “the man” was you.Tony It’s not moving anything as it’s a key and significant difference
You attempt to position yourself as a political commentator but you’ve really had no insight at all into this election and the views of the British public at all
In the past you’ve slobbered over Cameron, dribbled over Farage and now seem to be some kind of Corbynite crony
It’s a bit of a nightmare isn’t it?
Perhaps you’d like to come back to me with the IFS forecast on shareholder values of these policies and then we can have a text book discussion on them. Let’s start with the co operating purchase of shares in companies. What was the forecast losses for the economy from the IFS and why do you disagree with their views?
And why would this happen? Because as I said above they don't want to share any of the wealth and because the markets control the prices they're in a position to make it happen deliberately to keep on being greedy. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy because they want it to be.
Think of all the money they could save not having to employ people looking for ways around tax or on cosying up to MP's to get legislation they like. Just get on with business and the shareholders benefits. It just happens that would include the country in those shareholders. In what way are the markets for these companies changed? In what way are they being hindered from making profits? They aren't. If a company had a share issue and 10% of the shareholding was bought by GreedyBastard the market wouldn't go into meltdown, so there is no actual logical reason for them to do so if it went into the hands of public ownership. In anything there's less reason because that shareholder has further vested interest outside of the company for it to do well long-term and are in a position to enable it to do so as it has a say and funding for infrastructure/training that will benefit the company, whereas GreedyBastard is only in it for the profits for himself and once he thinks he's got as much as he can will discard those shares without a second thought.
Just engage you brain rather than the rhetoric and tell me which part of the explanation I gave doesn't make sense. I bet you can't and you deflect.
The only reason shareholder values would go down is because of scaremongering and greed of the shareholders themsleves
Get Brexit done? The only Tory one I remember.....Some of their policies must be decent- the Tories have copied them!
Surprise, surprise.
You say deflect but I asked a specific question on specific policy detail and the IFS forecast on the impact - can you please answer this first? Why have you ignored it?
I didn't ignore it - I said those forecasts are because investors would deliberately make it so to make it unpalatable. There is no logical reason for it to occur any more than from any other share issue. As I said if anything there is more of a benefit than from a normal share issue because the new shareholders have money, power and influence to improve the infrastructure etc to make the market better for them.
You have however ignored trying to put forward an argument as to logical flaws in the thinking.
Expect those who wanted to 'take back control' and were outraged at the EU having unelected officials will be up in arms at this.The Morgan stuff is an utter disgrace
Expect those who wanted to 'take back control' and were outraged at the EU having unelected officials will be up in arms at this.
Sure its in no way linked to her overseeing the investigation into the £100K Arcuri was given which cleared Johnson of any wrongdoing.
Probably talking bollocks here - and I'm sure they'll be plenty of people on here to confirm it and bash my comments but...
It makes me wonder how the result will affect Coventry. The City voted Labour - will the Tories think (a) Sod Coventry - they didn't want us so they can go to hell or (b) think, Coventry, they didn't vote for us so lets make things rosy for them so they love us when the next election comes around
No they need to learn that despises working poverty and either live with it or become a fringe Oxford pig fucking society - we won’t be investing in anything, we won’t be denying people to spend their hard earned pittance on their trip to the food bank, we won’t be taxing Amazon so that corporate tax revenues become a thing, we wont be forcing companies to pay anything
These are the politics of the Victorian era and no one wants them
I agree G the problem is a lot of people voted for it
So the total increase in borrowing is just a bit more than free internet for all.....Seems the public finances forecast that was due to be published before the election but was held back shows an additional £18.3bn in borrowing being needed this financial year.
That increases borrowing for the year from £29.3bn to £47.6bn.
Watchdog reveals £18bn hole in Boris Johnson’s UK budget
People will measure them on the main things that affect them: -OK so how against what criteria should we measure the success of the new government over next 5 years ...Here's a few for we need starters that I think we need to hold them accountable for....based on Brexit claims and their soundbites/manifesto....it might include....
1 Number of nurses/ doctors increased NHS £350m a week investment increase! ( based on infamous Bus slogan)
2.Number of policemen/women gained on 2010 figures.
3. Off shore tax haven reduction
4. Increase in corporate tax rates
5 Increase in affordable homes built
6 Reduction in food banks
7 New schools/education investment
8 Grassroots sport investment
9 Reduction in utility bills
10.I in green industries
11. More skilled colleges vocational subjects
12. Stop sale of arms to any dodgy governments
13. Investment in care homes, and support for home carers.
14. Properly funded local services/ Council's
15 Investment in buses, cycling, trains
16. A proper Economic Vision for each and every region!!!!
17. Immigration- based on a thorough understanding of all economic contributions to the emigrants make to .
the economy.
18 Stronger human rights act.
19 Higher food advertisement standards.
20 Tackleorganised crime ,drugs, sex trafficing, all forms of exploitation.
Will probably be more....
And also,People will measure them on the main things that affect them: -
1. Is Brexit dine so we a. don't have it rammed down our throats hourly on the news, & b. has stability & confidence at least clearly started to return in the economym
2. Do I feel safer now than I did in mid-late 2019?
3. Do I feel like I am getting a good vibe about my life?
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
All in '3' imoAnd also,
Is the NHS safe, and improving.
Is my job safe, and can I afford to live.
Are interest rates still low,
Is my pension safe, or do I have to work till I’m 70
Is my standard of living likely to improve.
But “vibe” could cover anything, like Will my dick ever be 9 inches?All in '3' imo
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
EXCL Tories ‘rather blasé’ about impact of cuts, says IFS chiefSo you have more academic knowledge than the IFS - ok
Realistically, the Tories nor anyone else can make a walrus out of a maggot.But “vibe” could cover anything, like Will my dick ever be 9 inches?
No one cares!! For an ex mining community to vote for thatchers party because there’s not been enough investment in their community is beyond understanding.
No one cares!! For an ex mining community to vote for thatchers party because there’s not been enough investment in their community is beyond understanding.
I’m still scratching my head to understand. I can understand a lot but that is completely beyond my understanding
Well at least we agree on that!Realistically, the Tories nor anyone else can make a walrus out of a maggot.
Sent from my SM-G935F using Tapatalk
Yeah, and Labour, LibDems and Greens all said they would increase borrowing by £90-£100 billion a year for the term of the parliament to pay for their schemes.Seems the public finances forecast that was due to be published before the election but was held back shows an additional £18.3bn in borrowing being needed this financial year.
That increases borrowing for the year from £29.3bn to £47.6bn.
Watchdog reveals £18bn hole in Boris Johnson’s UK budget
Lib Dems actually committed to deficit reduction. The IFS said debt would be on a downward path with their plans.Yeah, and Labour, LibDems and Greens all said they would increase borrowing by £90-£100 billion a year for the term of the parliament to pay for their schemes.
Shame they only got 11 MPs elected then.Lib Dems actually committed to deficit reduction. The IFS said debt would be on a downward path with their plans.
How did 11 anti democratic fuckers slip through the net?Shame they only got 11 MPs elected then.
What do you mean?If you give an honest answer to this question you’ll be called a sneering elitist. Not like the party that shat on these areas from a great height in the last decade and did so before in the 80s.
For investment not maintaining debt because the economy isn’t growing quick enough down to a combination of austerity and Brexit starving it of investment.Yeah, and Labour, LibDems and Greens all said they would increase borrowing by £90-£100 billion a year for the term of the parliament to pay for their schemes.
So the total increase in borrowing is just a bit more than free internet for all.....
Now that’s a nuanced argument that is absolutely correctFor investment not maintaining debt because the economy isn’t growing quick enough down to a combination of austerity and Brexit starving it of investment.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?