Why are you bothered about it? What is it that frightens you about the concept?So after a thread about adverts being banned and people being easily offended, I thought why not start another thread to offend more people
Personally, I think the woman is an arrogant c**t and I cant stand the sight of her. But, seen her in the news today that she's fighting for equal pay for the men's and women's USA Soccer teams. Now, in America, the women's team (game) is a bigger brand and they are certainly more successful than the men's team. So it begs the question, why are they paid less? Over here (europe) I dont think womens football could/should or would be able to demand as much wages as their male counterparts but, America is completely different in football. But if they start the rise in America, would women here demand the same? Or, would they just move to America chasing the money thus damaging our womens game that's growing very fast in popularity here?
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Did you even read my post??Why are you bothered about it? What is it that frightens you about the concept?
Sent from my ELE-L29 using Tapatalk
Isn't it a bit misleading though as they are actually talking about the salary cap in the NSWL compared to the MLS. In the NSWL its $16,538 to $46,200, in the MLS its a minimum of $56,250 without an upper limit per player (team limit is $4m but there are some players who don't count towards the cap).How would you feel if you were on a team that just won the World Cup (US Women) and you were paid less than a team that did not even qualify for the World Cup (USA Men)?
Edit, I've properly read your post on don't disagree, thread title should be different.Did you even read my post??
What concept is "frightening me"??
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
How would you feel if you were on a team that just won the World Cup (US Women) and you were paid less than a team that did not even qualify for the World Cup (USA Men)?
Read the article that I posted a link to. It's not that simple.Surely any pay is relative to the popularity of the sport in question and the money it brings in. Hence premier league paid more than league 2. Or in this country at least men paid more than women
Business generally is. More money you bring in more you get paid. Don’t see why it is necessary to complicate itRead the article that I posted a link to. It's not that simple.
You're the gift that just keeps on giving.She's a vile bloke
You can make an argument that in the USA , they do bring in more money than the men.Who, never heard of her just had to google her to find out. The women’s game doesn’t bring in as much money as the men’s game so they get less pay the pie is only so big.
You can make an argument that in the USA , they do bring in more money than the men.
After all the women's team won the World Cup and the men's team did not even qualify.
But it's not clear cut because some of the income is bundled together for both men and women.
Yeah MLS crowds are pretty decent overall.I would have thought mls crowds will be way higher then the female version and at real prices not super cheap to sell
Why would the women be paid more in the US?It’s simple really - The US women should keep all the women they make and separate it from the men.
You earn as much as you bring in. In the US the women should be paid more.
I find the same with tennis - The ATP and WTA should be separate. Pay goes from which each tour makes. The women shouldn’t be piggy backing off the men’s game
Sorry, to US Football I read somewhere that they bring more money in than the men’s team.Why would the women be paid more in the US?
Edit: Do you mean more than they are now or more than the men?
Maybe the women’s national team has made more than the men’s over the last couple years because the women were in their WC and the men weren’t, but the men’s players still make more money from their clubs.Sorry, to US Football I read somewhere that they bring more money in than the men’s team.
If that’s the case - they should be paid more. I’m all for proportionality
Maybe the women’s national team has made more than the men’s over the last couple years because the women were in their WC and the men weren’t, but the men’s players still make more money from their clubs.
I think that’s their argument - the USMNT makes more money as a wage from international appearances than the women do but the women bring in moreMaybe the women’s national team has made more than the men’s over the last couple years because the women were in their WC and the men weren’t, but the men’s players still make more money from their clubs.
I doubt the women’s national team bring in more than the men’s on a regular basis.I think that’s their argument - the USMNT makes more money as a wage from international appearances than the women do but the women bring in more
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?