He might well have done, like I've said I don't believe he isn't informed, I just dispute your premise that someone could google for a couple of hours and be informed when actually they could very easily end up believing the sisu version, I also dispute the premise really that most of those managers other than Pressley would be informed themselves, Sisu didn't move into full on evil mode until Robins left (well they had started the plan of course), I also don't know weather A you would take the opinion of someone very recently fired into account when you could easily assume they would be bitter, or B whether managers are actually allowed to slag off their club to other managers after they have left if they have signed something, I think it opens them up to litigation.
You could easily spend all day researching our situation and come out with completely the wrong opinion. After all we are building a new stadium, we were forced to move to northampton, we are debt free, we have one of the top budgets in the league, we are in the best financial position we've been in for 7 years if all your information came from the media it would be easy to believe all that.
The fact he has only signed for 2 months though suggests to me he is informed and isn't convinced about what he's been told, but thats just speculation.
I don't think people would be stupid enough to just read one or two articles and believe everything. They would have been on fans forums and twitter and all sorts doing a proper job to see whats going on.
Wrong opinion?
who said anything about 1 or two articles? I think if you googled for 2 hours you could easily read articles the entire time and believe alot of sisus viewpoint after all the telegraph prints the ccfc viewpoint as articles without comment all the time and most of the major newspaper articles have been sisu PR, the guardian excepted., I don't believe for a second that if a professional manager was to spend a couple of hours researching that it would include fans forums. They are cesspools, especially our ones and while this place does give the best information it would be an incredibly inefficient way to get it, you could spend months reading here if you wanted the full picture.
So you dont think that potential managers or owners would read fan opinion and try to see whats going on before going in? New managers wouldnt just go in blind, whether it is Pressley, Mowbray or coleman. They (or their people) would research first.
So you dont think that potential managers or owners would read fan opinion and try to see whats going on before going in? New managers wouldnt just go in blind, whether it is Pressley, Mowbray or coleman. They (or their people) would research first.
Not sure why you've now added potential owners, thats a completely different discussion, but thats right I don't believe for a second that a potential manager or their agent spends days reading fans forums before deciding whether or not to take a job, especially since the owners don't spend enough on players would be the view of the vast majority of clubs fans.
I can't believe any potential manager would take any notice of random comments made on a forum by random people. I know I am talking about our own little community, but what makes what we say valid and correct/factual? Why would someone read this forum and think "Those guys, whoever they are, obviously know what they are talking about, I won't go there then".
I can't believe any potential manager would take any notice of random comments made on a forum by random people. I know I am talking about our own little community, but what makes what we say valid and correct/factual? Why would someone read this forum and think "Those guys, whoever they are, obviously know what they are talking about, I won't go there then".
Have I said days?
Not sure of the issue you are trying to make?
Agree, but neither would they just walk into an interview without any preparation and sign on the dotted line, then wonder why Fishface, Faggot and Joyless were chuckling and rubbing their hands together whilst a storm raged outside.
but no one has said that, that is my point, someone has said they don't think mowbray is fully informed (which is a reasonable position) nick has taken that and suggested people think that mowbary is thick and that he hasn't done any reason, my point was that believing mowbary isn't fully informed does not mean you need to think that he is thick, nore that he did no research.
I don't just mean him, I mean managers in the past also (including Pressley). I agree, I don't think they are thick. I think they are fully aware of what they are getting into, the restraints, the budgets etc.
but no one has said that, that is my point, someone has said they don't think mowbray is fully informed (which is a reasonable position) nick has taken that and suggested people think that mowbary is thick and that he hasn't done any reason, my point was that believing mowbary isn't fully informed does not mean you need to think that he is thick, nore that he did no research.
Well, some have inferred that.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?