Might help us... (1 Viewer)

AFCCOVENTRY

Well-Known Member
Peterborough have just sold Washington to QPR. They are catching up with the play off pack.

Let's hope Walsall and Burton lose a few players...

QPR and Forest are after Burton winger El Kayouti.

Walsall as we know have a few of their players being hunted.

All helps with our promotion bid if the clubs around us lose players.

Of course they will have money to spend and might get good replacements. But it does disrupt team spirit if a top player leaves.
 

Kingokings204

Well-Known Member
I understand and I use to look at it like this but I'm a bigger fan now of winning our own games and keeping our own players.

Prime example when JFH left burton over a month ago we all said they were for the drop and look at them.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
thats great news,ive been impressed with washington. this could derail them if they do not replace

and before sickboy chimes in i said it COULD not that it will.

would love walsall to lose bradshaw and burton to lose their winger but who knows
 

SkyBlue_Bear83

Well-Known Member
Strange one Washington is, looked garbage for two years for Peterborough and gets a move off the back of two months in two years.

If he didn't play Peterborough you would guess nobody would be interested.
 

stupot07

Well-Known Member
I remember looking at the Peterborough forum after we beat them, and he was getting dogs abuse from their posters
 

Londonccfcfan

Well-Known Member
I remember looking at the Peterborough forum after we beat them, and he was getting dogs abuse from their posters

Yeah your right he was getting lots of abuse. When they played us I think he was the lad who had a good chance one on one and missed putting them 3 nil up last minute of first half.

We all know how the match ended.
 

higgs

Well-Known Member
If we had the money be nice to buy sayers dack and Bradshaw definitely get promoted then
 

covmark

Well-Known Member
It's a sad state of affairs when we are wishing other teams to lose their players.
I would hope we are good enough regardless.

Sent from my HTC One_M8 using Tapatalk
 

Hobo

Well-Known Member
Personally I find this thread embarrassing.
 

covcity4life

Well-Known Member
Like it helped when a couple lost their managers?

they made 2 very good replacements, one who knows club, other who plays same football and style

BUT its far too early to say i told you so, who knows where both clubs will finish the season
 

Otis

Well-Known Member
Thing is, people are talking here about other teams losing players as if we are seemingly immune ourselves.

If Fleck and Maddison were to go right now wouldn't we be weakened too?

Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
Thing is, people are talking here about other teams losing players as if we are seemingly immune ourselves.

If Fleck and Maddison were to go right now wouldn't we be weakened too?

Sent from my Hudl 2 using Tapatalk

yes but we are more likely to re-invest the money than Walsall
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
I don't get statements like this. Why TGp?

How do you know how much Walsall would re-invest vs what we'd re-invest??


Do walsall not have to make a profit as a club to allow their owner to take his ground rent? This could be wrong but if correct goes a long way to helping.

also a bit of history says they do not really invest too much on the playing staff.

aside from this its all guess work and maybe a bit of wishful thinking;)
 
Do walsall not have to make a profit as a club to allow their owner to take his ground rent? This could be wrong but if correct goes a long way to helping.

also a bit of history says they do not really invest too much on the playing staff.

aside from this its all guess work and maybe a bit of wishful thinking;)

It's wrong. The rent is the first thing to be paid, and we make profit as standard.

You're right we don't invest big in fees, but why would you when you can get the likes of Deeney, Grigg, Bradshaw, Sawyers, and Henry for free. More fool the others that pay over the odds to buy players on the way down.
 

Terry Gibson's perm

Well-Known Member
It's wrong. The rent is the first thing to be paid, and we make profit as standard.

You're right we don't invest big in fees, but why would you when you can get the likes of Deeney, Grigg, Bradshaw, Sawyers, and Henry for free. More fool the others that pay over the odds to buy players on the way down.



Thank you it as I said it could be wrong and it was:facepalm:.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top