I'm surprised no one has failed to mention this article by les Reid comes out in the same day if not hours before the "big appeal" was denied? Not a coincidence the cynic in me would say.
Isn't the timeline like this: SISU say freehold or nothing in July, but then say they will consider a long-leasehold option in a letter in November?
Indeed and you know what pal, I wouldn't mind having a little bet that this individual didn't put his friends in the Rugby world onto the possibilities in CV6, his vigorous and vicious defence at times of this shady deal is a bit bizarre !?
actually no it wouldn't because in 2013 there is a 475k exceptional item attributable to the loan renegotiation. so the change round is 775-475+392= 692 substantially less than even just the lost CCFC rent, let alone the lost F&B profit or overhead contribution /matchday fees
Only quote I have heard on the payments for the loan is that the CCC has earnt £1m plus from it which would tie in with the disclosures in the accounts to 2014 where in that year over £700k interest was paid ...... so by now it would be well over £1m in total
14.4m loan over 40 years if capital payments were equal each year (which they wont be I believe) then that capital repaid would be 360k each year. Like I say you pay less capital early years so 112k is not that unlikely
There is of course the small matter of ACL pumping £1m into the figures each year as the pay off from Isle of Capri.
That's sure to inflate the headllines a bit....
Well ! I've read, and re-read the Observer article. The Observer keep stating "Evidence" but do
not show this "Evidence" If a letter was sent to Ann Lucas, it becomes her property because her name is on the Letter/Envelope/E-Mail and would think anything to show her to be a liar publicly would NOT come into the public domain. Then to cap it all....I read the reporter is non other than Mr LES REID. The man who went to great lengths to "Big himself up" as being the one and only to get a exclusive 2+ hours meeting with JS. The one and only reporter on Twitter to delete anyone following him if they so much as raised a question in opposition to that which he reported.............and Samo asks me why I'm accusing "The Observer" to which I will once again state...I'm not accusing anyone, just putting out a question that has two possible answers to which posters can make up their own minds about, nothing more, nothing less.
SBK... If Anne Lucas had you wearing a gimp mask, bent over her desk and was riding you with a strap-on while singing ' ha ha ha, he he he, I stole the future of CCFC' you would find a way to blame SISU.
Maybe because sisu are to blame. You really think the last 7 years have been great for the club? They've been disastrous on and off the pitch. That's down to
sisu not the council
Yawn.
Great reply. So your happy too with the current state of our club? Seems to be everyone on here like the way our club is being ran. No wonder only 6,000 fans are left.
Christ, are you Michael? As soon as you say anything different to you it means instantly everybody is happy.
Great reply. So your happy too with the current state of our club? Seems to be everyone on here pile
the way our club is being ran. No wonder only 6,000 fans are left.
Utter bollocks.Well clearly everyone is happy because no-one is doing anything other then slag the council off who has fuck all to do with the club now. If only people used energy on trying to get something sorted to help the club rather then spend time slagging the council off all day
None of the cuntsWell isn't this just a big game of BS by all.
What and who are the public suppose to believe?
@ Samo....You're blind f**king nobhead(With all due respect) I've stated on at least 3 seperate
occasions.....How can I put this in the simplest of terms just for you..............I'm NOT accusing anyone. I'm asking a question that has two possible answers. Nothing more, nothing less. Has it sunk in this time?
When I put the question of CET and the observer on the thread and YOU reply to it, it says to me you ARE talking about the Observer. Otherwise what reason have you got to attack my post? You ,F**king retard.
I don't think you're in any position to call anybody a retard.When I put the question of CET and the observer on the thread and YOU reply to it, it says to me you ARE talking about the Observer. Otherwise what reason have you got to attack my post? You ,F**king retard.
Of course I'm not happy, I fucking hate SISU, I just blame others too. Simple really.
Well ! I've read, and re-read the Observer article. The Observer keep stating "Evidence" but do not show this "Evidence" If a letter was sent to Ann Lucas, it becomes her property because her name is on the Letter/Envelope/E-Mail and would think anything to show her to be a liar publicly would NOT come into the public domain. Then to cap it all....I read the reporter is non other than Mr LES REID. The man who went to great lengths to "Big himself up" as being the one and only to get a exclusive 2+ hours meeting with JS. The one and only reporter on Twitter to delete anyone following him if they so much as raised a question in opposition to that which he reported.............and Samo asks me why I'm accusing "The Observer" to which I will once again state...I'm not accusing anyone, just putting out a question that has two possible answers to which posters can make up their own minds about, nothing more, nothing less.
You got that too, pmsl
Okay you blame others too. Who now has the power to change the direction of our club, are they capable? Don't blame Pressley, ask who gave him a four year contract?
It's an odd world we live in. If this time last week you'd have said we'd be talking about Reid, Fisher and Labovich being the most truthful people in this saga I'd have said you were in need of a lie down but it's starting to look that way.
@ Deleted member 5849......I apologise once again for losing my temper with some of the youngsters who seem to be far more knowledgeable than any of us old fogeys could ever wish to be. I didn't realise that I and other old fogeys do NOT have the right to express an opinion on a forum without getting the verbals from the know it all youngsters. good night gentlemen.
tbf, I'd be surprised if he deleted you, as you're (generally) civil.
Sky Blue Kid however...
@ Deleted member 5849......I apologise once again for losing my temper with some of the youngsters who seem to be far more knowledgeable than any of us old fogeys could ever wish to be. I didn't realise that I and other old fogeys do NOT have the right to express an opinion on a forum without getting the verbals from the know it all youngsters. good night gentlemen.
.......
The revelations raise questions over whether councillors had acted on false information from senior council executives last October when they voted in private to sell the council’s Ricoh Arena shares to the then High Wycombe-based rugby club on a long leasehold - which the Sky Blues HAD also sought.
@ Jack Griffin........Lmfao.....I asked him in his marathon 2+ hours interview if he managed to ask JS if CCFC would be paying rent to SISU if they built a new ground. I was dropped quicker than a piece of molten lava.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?