Election Day
Maladministration with injustice
I'm not excusing what the council have done. Selling to Wasps is the biggest blow to hit our club out of everything that has happened. However you can't just ignore the reasons why they sold to Wasps. I don't need to go over that old ground, we all know the story. The fact is that Sisu have been underhand, devious and obviously very difficult to deal with. Nobody it seems wants to have anything to do with them. When you see the tangled web of legal action taken out against Higgs, CCC and with Wasps still to come you can understand why. Sisu have no honour. How can anyone be blamed for keeping them at arms length.
Torchy that is.
Two-faced fucker.
Who me? Or my son? Or both of us? I just want to know your level of fucking twatishness.*
*apologies to Hill83.
You're so two-faced pal, agreeing about Northampton but go there yourself.
Totally disagree. CCC would have NEVER sold to SISU. "Hell will freeze over", remember. Wasps would have been on the scene regardless and The Council would have done exactly the same thng.
Not excusing the Northampton move. Shocking decision.
One point. Remember Lucas saying that Wasps would not have a detrimental affect on the football club. What do you reckon about that?
QUOTE="Warwickhunt, post: 1179437, member: 4907"]In all this banter no one is questioning why the council sold our assett(Coventry Taxpayers) so cheaply to the WASP's! All this About SISU shit is not giving me that answer. If they had sold it for £42 million the correct valuation I would not have a problem with WASP ownership. Instead the Nationals rags putting out shit headlines this morning about Southgate being involved some tax avoidance scheme these fucking hacks need to dig into the goings on in this deal that's where the good stuff is.
No need to apologise to me. This is great. Carry on.
I'm sorry, I think you're wrong and let me explain why.
The council should act in precisely the same manner towards a business irrespective of who owns it. If the council treats a new owner of the football club significantly better than the current owners there will be a legal case to answer.
Thanks.
SBK, just once more before I block you: Fuck off you sad little prick.
That wasn't what I meant. I meant what have SISU asked for that CCC have refused that they might agree to with new owners?
I suggest we don't really know much of what has actually gone on at this stage, so we don't know what the club has spoken to the council about.
One thing we do know a little of is the goings on at The Butts and this suggests the council hasn't been acting terribly professionally. It seems the council sought information about what the football club had been talking to Coventry Rugby Club about, commercially sensitive information the council had no right to. It also seems the council tried to get a ban on professional football being played at The Butts, something that seems dangerously like an attempt to restrict trade.
I don't see why they would deal with anyone taking legal action against them, it is a perfectly reasonable position.
IIRC. Wasn't there a football restriction in place before what you're talking about?
I suggest you read the linked article:
http://coventryobserver.co.uk/news/...id-b-coventry-city-f-c-butts-groundshare/
How are Cov United playing there?And I suggest you read this.... http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-rfc-chairman-reveals-butts-10635203
How are Cov United playing there?
Has it been lifted now?I'm talking "Past tense" Nick. Read it! also read my post #434
PS. Also take a look at the date of printing in the Telegraph
And I suggest you read this.... http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-rfc-chairman-reveals-butts-10635203
Has it been lifted now?
Fuck off you fucking, fucking, fucking, fucking, prick.*
This is why I called you a two-faced fucker pal.... You still went though didn't you!!! Ya fucking,fucking,fucking,fucking,fucking wanker!
SBK, just once more before I block you: Fuck off you sad little prick.
Boo hoo don't block me twat.!
Womens football and American football have both been played at The Butts in the recent past. The Sky Blues ticket office is based at The Butts. There have been various beer festivals, weddings and other social events at The Butts. According to your Simon Gilbert article, all of these activities breach the lease.
The Simon Gilbert article lacks any credibility.
This is just like being at work.
So why would they try to block specifically pro football? Very strange.I don't know Nick, all I do know is there was a "Football Restriction" dated pre December 2015
This is just like being at work.
You at the council then? :angelic:This is just like being at work.
I don't know Nick, all I do know is there was a "Football Restriction" dated pre December 2015
So why would they try to block specifically pro football? Very strange.
Lmfao.. But Les Reid's of "The Observer" does hahaha.... Dated May 16 2016. btw
You seem so knowledgeable...
Tell me, where's the restriction that specifically mentions football been published?
But you haven't shown anything?Don't shoot the messenger nick.
Oh dear, you do make assumptions don't you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?