Mowbray!! (1 Viewer)

Captain Dart · Apr 25, 2016

Nick said:
Surely you can prove it, otherwise if it is just about budget the team with the higher budget of the 2 would never lose against lower budget teams?

Of course it doesn't work that way, its a statistical measurement against published data, you can get unexpected results, but they are significantly less common.

oscillatewildly · Apr 25, 2016

Gynnsthetonic said:
Would not surprise me at all if he resigned after the Oldham game!

Yeah, cheers Tone. Thanks for leaving us with a fucking grey team bus.

chiefdave · Apr 25, 2016

Can't see him resigning. Why would he be making signings like Jones if he wasn't planning to be here?

dongonzalos · Apr 25, 2016

Gazolba said:
It's pointless talking about budgets unless you know what the budget covers. We may have a 'top 6' budget but we might have allocated only 25% of that for the team. We do know that SISU want the club to be self-supporting. That means attendances and season ticket sales are critical. We can also expect player sales to be needed to balance the books.

It's the player budget that he said was 8-6th

RegTheDonk · Apr 25, 2016

johnwillomagic said:
Ha Nick that's abput the mental capacity of the fans who are still blaming it all on sisu.....i'm woth Grendel on this
Brylowes must mean the council.

I'm surprised the Tory pamphlet shoved through doors doesn't say "Vote Tory - We Didn't Sell The Ricoh"

Grendel · Apr 25, 2016

dongonzalos said:
It's the player budget that he said was 8-6th

Why do you go low to high which is not logical.

Also some players are excluded. Also we almost certainly over spent the budget.

Nick · Apr 25, 2016

dongonzalos said:
Which manager?

The one who keeps changing the starting lineup most weeks?

Not sure which mission you are on, I think it is something to do with 6-8th though. You should get a tattoo with it.

dongonzalos · Apr 25, 2016

Nick said:
The one who keeps changing the starting lineup most weeks?

Not sure which mission you are on, I think it is something to do with 6-8th though. You should get a tattoo with it.

Sorry we had so many mangers in the last few years it's hard to keep up.

It's straight forward for me TM takes over a squad heading for relegation.
Uses a player budget that is 7th in the league and we will finish between 14th to 8th.
So it's a bit of his own squad and a bit of what he inherited and he has under achieved a slightly. However I would give him a bit of slack as he is trying to get his own squad.
If next season he under achieves again for me that should be it.
Now if our budget is as Mr Waggot said 8th-6th?
The question is what is underachieving next season?
Is it below 8th-6th?
Or do we expect him to do better than his budget when all his predecessors have under achieved with the budget.

Grendel · Apr 25, 2016

dongonzalos said:
Sorry we had so many mangers in the last few years it's hard to keep up.

It's straight forward for me TM takes over a squad heading for relegation.
Uses a player budget that is 7th in the league and we will finish between 14th to 8th.
So it's a bit of his own squad and a bit of what he inherited and he has under achieved a slightly. However I would give him a bit of slack as he is trying to get his own squad.
If next season he under achieves again for me that should be it.
Now if our budget is as Mr Waggot said 8th-6th?
The question is what is underachieving next season?
Is it below 8th-6th?
Or do we expect him to do better than his budget when all his predecessors have under achieved with the budget.

6th to 8th zzzzzzzz

johnwillomagic · Apr 25, 2016

Get it right Nick & Grendel it clearly is logically 8th-6th.......

Grendel · Apr 25, 2016

johnwillomagic said:
Get it right Nick & Grendel it clearly is logically 8th-6th.......

It's clearly trolling

dongonzalos · Apr 26, 2016

johnwillomagic said:
Get it right Nick & Grendel it clearly is logically 8th-6th.......

1st time you finally understand, small miracles do happen.
I take you don't know more than Waggot anymore?

dongonzalos · Apr 26, 2016

Grendel said:
It's clearly trolling

Well if an expert in field identifies trolling. Who can argue with you?

Mowbray!! (1 Viewer)

Captain Dart

Well-Known Member

oscillatewildly

Well-Known Member

chiefdave

Well-Known Member

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member

RegTheDonk

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member

Nick

Administrator

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member

johnwillomagic

Well-Known Member

Grendel

Well-Known Member

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member

dongonzalos

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Mowbray!! (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency