H
Yep, agree. TM WOULD see some of the money, I am convinced of it.Back when negotiations between Mowbray and CCFC owners were dragging on for a couple of weeks, it came out that it was because Mowbray wanted complete control of the budget and not split pots for different runnings costs.
Now, I don't know any of this and it's just speculation, but I would bet that he also wanted to final say on players being signed etc. So, with all the Maddison hype at the moment, I see some people saying "well if we got £5million we wouldn't see any of that anyway it would be Wilson all over again" etc.
Does anyone think that Mowbray would be naive enough to have not addressed that in his contract negotiations after seeing what happened with Wilson (rightly or wrongly)? I'm pretty sure with all his experience he would say something like I want X amount of any transfer fees available for the budget.
Relax
Back when negotiations between Mowbray and CCFC owners were dragging on for a couple of weeks, it came out that it was because Mowbray wanted complete control of the budget and not split pots for different runnings costs.
Now, I don't know any of this and it's just speculation, but I would bet that he also wanted to final say on players being signed etc. So, with all the Maddison hype at the moment, I see some people saying "well if we got £5million we wouldn't see any of that anyway it would be Wilson all over again" etc.
Does anyone think that Mowbray would be naive enough to have not addressed that in his contract negotiations after seeing what happened with Wilson (rightly or wrongly)? I'm pretty sure with all his experience he would say something like I want X amount of any transfer fees available for the budget.
Relax
Wouldn't surprise me if it was concrete. After all it looks like the rest of the requirements regarding the management of the budget we're concrete hence the delay in signing. I hope it was anywayThis is why I said elsewhere that the majority would be reinvested by the owners. Or at least a substantial amount that TM may have insisted upon at the outset. Not so sure though TM would have quite got such a concrete promise in his contract as you suggest here. But the pressure would certainly be on SISU to make available much more than 10% of any fee that materialized.
If we needed a big thick slab we would have kept Andy Webster.Why do we need concrete ? not for the new stadium because there isnt one
with Sisus track record we would be lucky If 10% of the transfer fee was re invested in the team!!
Let's just pump all the money into the transfer kitty and not bother about paying wages and operating costs.
Moron.
Right. Like he probably has no control over the general money pot or where that's spent right?Well since TM has said publicly (at least CT reported he did) "do not sell Maddison", that leads me to believe it is not his decision to make. I'd be surprised if he has any say over how much we get or where the money goes, surely that's up to the people who have the full picture of our financial situation.
which is more than being coverd currently with the 11,000 break even crowd target.Let's just pump all the money into the transfer kitty and not bother about paying wages and operating costs.
Moron.
Why do we need concrete ? not for the new stadium because there isnt one
Did you even read the OP?with Sisus track record we would be lucky If 10% of the transfer fee was re invested in the team!!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?