Grendel
Well-Known Member
No it shows up the people who claimed he's too good and a championship player in demand were talking shite.
Unless of course you now are going to suggest sisu are matching these championship wages.
Which is it?
Quite by far the best thing about this is that it shows him up. :emoji_smile_cat::emoji_smile_cat::emoji_smile_cat::emoji_smile_cat::emoji_smile_cat:
More seriously, Haynes has got plenty about him, he he just needs to be a bit more consistent and cut out his defensive howlers (if he is staying at LB).
Maybe he's just realised everyone on here thinks he's a knob.
No it shows up the people who claimed he's too good and a championship player in demand were talking shite.
Unless of course you now are going to suggest sisu are matching these championship wages.
Which is it?
No it shows up the people who claimed he's too good and a championship player in demand were talking shite.
Unless of course you now are going to suggest sisu are matching these championship wages.
Which is it?
Oh dear! If people think Haynes had offers from higher up they are living in cloud cuckoo land.Has just signed a 2 year L2 deal as there was obviously no one else even though he waited till the last minute.Won't be Haynes, he had offers from championship clubs presume that they are paying more
If I was Mark Robins I would look to play Ryan Haynes more advanced as a Winger, defensively (for me) he has never been solid, but going forward he has great athletisism, good technique and some skills, plus having watched him during the academy days he can hit the ball as well!
I've worn my hands out, just got bleedin stumps now.
Great news.
Hopefully Haynes as LB
Camwell as back up and Stokes as CB
Why is is always to do with wages maybe he is happy here?No it shows up the people who claimed he's too good and a championship player in demand were talking shite.
Unless of course you now are going to suggest sisu are matching these championship wages.
Which is it?
We can't all benefit from your wisdom - after all we all haven't been on your course.
Why are you such a pompus Twat?[/QUOTE
Thinks he is at work where everyone hangs on all the bullshit he speaks.
He only really came into the side in 2014.Seriously not bothered about him re-signing. How many chances are we going to give the bloke in the hope he may come good? We've all been saying the same thing for the past 5 years yet there has been no consistency and no real hope that he is going to turn out to be a decent player. Offers nothing defensively and the occasional successful foray forward isn't enough for the past few years waiting for this talent to be realized.
He was never going to be snapped up by a Championship club, this will be his level and if he excels then so be it. Same with Burge. 2 players re-signed for convenience rather than talent.
Yeah, but that was just to avoid other employees thereeven turned down a job with your employers.
He only really came into the side in 2014.
Sent from my D6603 using Tapatalk
Doubt stokes will with the current balance of the squad unless Turnbull leaves and Harries is sold.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I am fairly sure Turnball will leave and at this stage I think Stokes is better than Harries. However you do need 4 CB's to be fair,2 RB and 2 LB
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?