Because this is the line he said about that note the "maybe and the "but"
“If the team gets back into the Championship, maybe then they should look at building a new stadium, but what they have got seems like a pretty good deal to me."
This is the other line he said
Coventry City owners’ plans to build a new stadium seem “crazy”,
Which is more compelling of his opinion?
He has no reputation for being an expert does he?
He is talking twaddle is a Cnut and is generally a laughing stock on fans forums.
Also he lectures at the academic excellence that is Sheffield Hallam.
The bbc seem to use him as their main ho to man when football finance is discussed.
He seems very well respected
I'm quoting the BBC
He has no reputation for being an expert does he?
He is talking twaddle is a Cnut and is generally a laughing stock on fans forums.
Also he lectures at the academic excellence that is Sheffield Hallam.
Forget what the "experts" say, it's not something we didn't all know anyway.
Glad you agree we need our own ground to be attractive to investors.
Leaving aside any talk of a sale, what will owning our own ground mean?Glad you agree we need our own ground to be attractive to investors.
Leaving aside any talk of a sale, what will owning our own ground mean?
If a SISU company owns the new ground and Sets the Rent, do you think Investors will come Running to buy CCFC? I don't.
If a SISU company owns the new ground and Sets the Rent, do you think Investors will come Running to buy CCFC? I don't.
The point which I am trying to make is that a new tinpot stadium is unlikely to make any more money that can be generated by staying at the Ricoh.
And yet, staying at the Ricoh under the currently arrangements little/limited revenues mean that we have one of the lowest turnovers in the championship should we ever gain promotion.
Rock and hard place.
Let's not write something off before we have actually seen a business case (not that I believe that we will built a stadium).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Isn't this where the graph showing we have the third/fourth lowest turnovers ,but doesn't show our turnover is put up?
You mean our turnover wasn't on the graph? We know what our turnover was and we know that only 3 teams had a lower one.
Do you really need to see it in a graph to believe it?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
You do? I dont, post it up then in the same format as the rest on the graph otherwise your statement is meaningless.
In this hypothetical scenario the clubs new owners could ask ACL and SISU to put forward their best rent offer to the club. With two stadiums in competition we should get a good deal.
Surely the point is, new investors would come and buy both the stadium management company and the football club off Sisu.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
The value of which ( stadium management company ) would be governed by the site, capacity, non Match day Revenues and Rent. i don't see much value and still think that this all about Real Estat.
I would guess matchday incomes at Ricoh this season would be in excess of 1.5m
There is a connection between success, crowds and commercial obviously but you really would still have to question the clubs marketing strategy, performance and abilities. It has been a shambles far too often this season. Have they maximised the commercial income opportunities?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?