J
Jack Griffin
Guest
I quite like that idea, but someone with competence in business, building and the law to some extent please and not Mr Fishers choice.
The Telegraph and / or Trust should send a (polite!) open letter to SISU and request that an independent person be shown all the information on the new ground. They can sign confidentiality agreements and won't share any details but can simply report back if they believe anything is actually happening or not.
Whereas if you treat everything everybody says as bollocks until proven true it is easier.
All ready been done mr Strange said he had seen it Mr Ward said they haven't.The Telegraph and / or Trust should send a (polite!) open letter to SISU and request that an independent person be shown all the information on the new ground. They can sign confidentiality agreements and won't share any details but can simply report back if they believe anything is actually happening or not.
So much money has supposedly been paid out to all these architects, planning consultants etc. that are supposed to be doing all this work we hear about ?
All ready been done mr Strange said he had seen it Mr Ward said they haven't.
SorryI said independent
"@CCFCStadium: During SCG conference call today (20/12) Fisher confirmed that there was massive progress on the land purchase. Announcement in the New Year"
Says it all really, so I'll just be patient and wait and see, PUSB!
Hmm does it really though? I'm sure you've postured with this bullshit on many occasions in the past. Still waiting for anything credible to appear from that porky pie writing keyboard of yours!
OK just take a look back to July/Aug posts and my prediction re-Ricoh.
"@CCFCStadium: During SCG conference call today (20/12) Fisher confirmed that there was massive progress on the land purchase. Announcement in the New Year"
Says it all really, so I'll just be patient and wait and see, PUSB!
"@CCFCStadium: During SCG conference call today (20/12) Fisher confirmed that there was massive progress on the land purchase. Announcement in the New Year"
Says it all really, so I'll just be patient and wait and see, PUSB!
"@CCFCStadium: During SCG conference call today (20/12) Fisher confirmed that there was massive progress on the land purchase. Announcement in the New Year"
Says it all really, so I'll just be patient and wait and see, PUSB!
I'm starting to think you actually believe the bullshit that you that you bring yourself to type.ointlaugh:
Get a grip of yourself. Fisher talks shite, and it seems you swallow every ridiculous word of it.
OK just take a look back to July/Aug posts and my prediction re-Ricoh.
Ohhhhh yeesssssssssssssBefore that weren't you saying we'll never go back there?
Sorry, you are just a nodding dog who does as it's told & believes it.
Wouldn't somebody need to check if they could get permissions though?Without going into prediction whether they will build a new stadium or not ... what would be the order of process?
1) Locate a potential site - contact authorities for permissions - then buy the site
2) Locate a potential site - buy the site on condition planning permissions will be issued - then apply for permissions
I would say 2) but am no expert.
Sorry, you are just a nodding dog who does as it's told & believes it.
Ohhhhh noooooooooooThat statement could also be levelled at you though, couldn't it?
That statement could also be levelled at you though, couldn't it?
Is anyone actually suprised by all of this, I really do not think the trust needed to even waste their time and effort asking for the information, after all anyone with their marbles still intact would of predicted the outcome of the information provided.
If you still or even did believe we would ever build, then call yourself a doctor or take yourself down A+E for a head examination.
Question now is, how long are we all going to put up with this utter and complete bullshit watching our club be destroyed and the proud heritage we once had become dust.
I suppose we can all continue bitching about it for another 2 years before we are the next Hereford United and then complain about what if's, after all every suggestion that posters put, their is always someone being negative and saying oh no we cannot do that, or the famous oh who would come in who would fund this and that, well, seriously, could it get any worse than it is now?
Without going into prediction whether they will build a new stadium or not ... what would be the order of process?
1) Locate a potential site - contact authorities for permissions - then buy the site
2) Locate a potential site - buy the site on condition planning permissions will be issued - then apply for permissions
I would say 2) but am no expert.
Buy land subject to planning
The good news is that it is possible to avoid a lot of risk without reducing the potential gain. This is because it is perfectly legal and possible to make a planning application on land you do not own. You don’t even need the permission of the landowner — permission goes with the land, not with the applicant.
This means it is common practice in the development world to make a purchase subject to satisfactory planning permission — this is legally secured by exchanging contracts with completion conditional upon getting the permission you want, or by entering into an Option Agreement, which gives you the legal option to buy if you’re successful or to walk away if you’re not. Although such agreements require legal fees, very little money changes hands compared to the value of the site once it has the permission.
- See more at: http://www.homebuilding.co.uk/advic...-get-planning-permission#sthash.TnQjWKft.dpuf
I was wondering that, If they are asking if Tim Fisher has spoken to them for example, does that cover waggot? What if it's a third party?
Plus we all know mistakes with foi can be made, as down by ccc
I was wondering that, If they are asking if Tim Fisher has spoken to them for example, does that cover waggot? What if it's a third party?
Plus we all know mistakes with foi can be made, as down by ccc
I think mistakes would be unlikely. Falsifying an foi response could result in a custodial sentence so you would expect this information to be highly accurate.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?