It isn't spin, it is completely making things up
Quite probably, but you can guarantee that they'll argue it was implied because by the end of that agreement the chairman of the club had said they would have their own new stadium by then, and so they didn't feel it needed to be an expressed term.
Complete horseshit but it's how they'll spin it. Cases have been fought over more trivial terms.
So the council leader would say they lied to tax payers because "somebody else lied first"?
Dig Deep.
State control? What on earth are you on about.
You're now saying a framework should be in place for private enterprise yet you are also saying we should ignore the framework that the council should be working to that is already in place.
Isn't company law the framework for private enterprise?
So what's implied for cov rugby? If they ever do something to piss them off is something going to be randomly added on?No, they'll say they believed it was implied because they took Fisher at his word given the language he was using, renders etc (not that he intentionally lied as circumstances can change) on the new stadium and they therefore took it that the football club would be secure by the end of the agreement and therefore felt it unnecessary to express it clearly at the time.
That's why it's spin. I can believe it's bollocks, you can believe it's bollocks but the fact is no-one can actually disprove that is what they actually had in mind at the time. Thus you, nor I, nor anyone else can PROVE it's a lie, no matter how seemingly clear it may seem.
So the council leader would say they lied to tax payers because "somebody else lied first"?
Dig Deep.
No she said 'Own a ship', Fisher said....Cllr Lucas said that there was a ‘pathway to ownership’ while putting the final touches on the Wasps deal.
In Coventry?In a separate matter I teach young Wasps fans who brag about kicking Cov out the ground. Sad state of affairs
In Coventry?
Buy some weed and say you caught them with itIn a separate matter I teach young Wasps fans who brag about kicking Cov out the ground. Sad state of affairs
Buy some weed and say you caught them with it
Point the bullies in their direction.Warwickshire
Point the bullies in their direction.
So the council leader would say they lied to tax payers because "somebody else lied first"?
Dig Deep.
What country are you in where politicians lying is a scandal? Because I’d like to move there.
You’re not even allowed to call an MP a liar in Parliament
Tony Blair’s rep has taken a massive hit since he lied in Parliament about WMDsWhat country are you in where politicians lying is a scandal? Because I’d like to move there.
You’re not even allowed to call an MP a liar in Parliament
Tony Blair’s rep has taken a massive hit since he lied in Parliament about WMDs
Haha. I taught primary kids until fairly recently in and around Rugby. We had some flyers from wasps doing the rounds. The batch that was meant for my class mysteriously ended up in the bin.Warwickshire
Haha. I taught primary kids until fairly recently in and around Rugby. We had some flyers from wasps doing the rounds. The batch that was meant for my class mysteriously ended up in the bin.
Going back further, when MK Dons suddenly appeared at the expense of Wimbledon we got some flyers for after school soccer schools with then at a school in Northamptonshire. Needless to say they went in the bin as well.
Sometimes you've just got to do it.
There's a big difference between spinning, which is what we are used to with most politicians, and outright lying over an extended period of time.What country are you in where politicians lying is a scandal? Because I’d like to move there.
Couple of other things from Byng on the facebook group.What's he saying?
I know that it is PL for Tottenham, but the question remains - how did EFL come up with miles? Why not 10 or 3? What is the rationale?13 miles to be precise, the PL would be accountable for Tottenham's situation as opposed to the EFL.
Who would pay a moron like Duggins a salary as a director of anything?Not just flying the flag for Coventry, Eastwood and Duggins both (paid) directors (and sole representatives from Coventry) of West Midlands Growth Ltd quango formed from West Midlands Combined Authority.
Just ask them of their thoughts about playing second fiddle to Wycombe whilst they were at Adams Park? Or do they think wasps only existed post 2014In a separate matter I teach young Wasps fans who brag about kicking Cov out the ground. Sad state of affairs
It’s not black and white. What’s in black and white are the words “subject to a commercial agreement”, which makes it essentially worthless as that’s a subjective opinion. You and I may argue continued rent charges are a commercial agreement even with the legals, Wasps May argue that the legals mean it’s not an agreement that’s commercially viable.
The fact is there was no realistic legal route to ensuring that Wasps would rent to Sisu under any circumstances. The mistake the councillors made was giving that impression in interviews when it wasn’t possible.
But then you’ve got to get on at May for not fixing social problems, or Cameron for not being the greenest government ever, or Blair for privatising education, or, or, or. That’s politics. The punishment is being voted out if you do it too much but history suggests that’s not likely.
So yes, get angry at councillors for giving the wrong impression. But don’t expect it to resolve the current situation.
Again, I’m sorry this isn’t what you want to hear but I won't patronise you.
What is actually going to be in SISU's statement? Will it just be an indication of plans for next season or will further information be provided?
Probably something along the lines of.
Statment start:
We batter people in court.
Statement ends.
Nah, it will have something fake about loving Coventry.
I would say that's enough to expect talks. That's the first issue to get over!It’s not black and white. What’s in black and white are the words “subject to a commercial agreement”, which makes it essentially worthless as that’s a subjective opinion. You and I may argue continued rent charges are a commercial agreement even with the legals, Wasps May argue that the legals mean it’s not an agreement that’s commercially viable.
The fact is there was no realistic legal route to ensuring that Wasps would rent to Sisu under any circumstances. The mistake the councillors made was giving that impression in interviews when it wasn’t possible.
But then you’ve got to get on at May for not fixing social problems, or Cameron for not being the greenest government ever, or Blair for privatising education, or, or, or. That’s politics. The punishment is being voted out if you do it too much but history suggests that’s not likely.
So yes, get angry at councillors for giving the wrong impression. But don’t expect it to resolve the current situation.
Again, I’m sorry this isn’t what you want to hear but I won't patronise you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?