Sniffer dogs are the only solution I've been aware of at concerts
Sniffer dogs are the only solution I've been aware of at concertsIt's a small bag of powder. Probably in a pocket or even a wallet. It's totally impossible to police that on the turnstiles.
It's a small bag of powder. Probably in a pocket or even a wallet. It's totally impossible to police that on the turnstiles.
They could have sniffer dogs wandering about.It's a small bag of powder. Probably in a pocket or even a wallet. It's totally impossible to police that on the turnstiles.
I used to stand in front of someone in the WT who'd chain smoke hash throughout the game, not sure it'd be a lot of fun.Who smokes weed at the footy anyway. I’ve turned up stoned before and you don’t want to sing and the whole experience is just muted.
I used to stand in front of someone in the WT who'd chain smoke hash throughout the game, not sure it'd be a lot of fun.
probably not as they don't seem to want to pay for muchThe latest generation of scanners (the type you walk through) can supposedly detect small amounts of drugs. Not sure if the ones they use at the O2 do that but they definitely detect other things and have replaced searching everyone. You literally just walk through them without stopping and they pull anyone over that flags up. Had the same thing when I went to the ice hockey in Sweden.
The tech is there, just depends on if Frasers or the club wants to pay for it.
it's an extra cost for something that happens at most grounds and in reality all you get is people taking all their drugs before they get there meaning you are just left with people who have taken their drugs in far too short a space of time.They could have sniffer dogs wandering about.
But why?They could have sniffer dogs wandering about.
Why not?But why?
Oh, so thats OK then. We just put up with it,it's an extra cost for something that happens at most grounds and in reality all you get is people taking all their drugs before they get there meaning you are just left with people who have taken their drugs in far too short a space of time.
Oh, so thats OK then. We just put up with it,
Just cos it's hard to police doesn't mean we shouldn't. Cokeheads acting like twats is a big negative experience. It's not like half of them don't show obvious signs of being sniffed up. Can't the police act on suspicions of being under the influence of drugs? If they have these suspicions maybe they should be able to take them aside and do more thorough searches or demand they be tested?Coke I couldn’t care less about and it’s more trouble to stop than it’s worth. Weed should be a no brainier though. There’s a fucking huge cloud of smoke to follow!
Just cos it's hard to police doesn't mean we shouldn't. Cokeheads acting like twats is a big negative experience. It's not like half of them don't show obvious signs of being sniffed up. Can't the police act on suspicions of being under the influence of drugs? If they have these suspicions maybe they should be able to take them aside and do more thorough searches or demand they be tested?
yeah, I accept that. Hence why it'd have to be, as you say, clamping down on people acting like twats. And maybe part of that clampdown should involve thorough searches and drug tests so charges/banning orders can be brought against them. Anyone caught in possession or found to have drug in their system automatically banned for at least two years.We could always just clamp down on people acting like twats. But you can’t stop coke being brought in unless you go full body search at the turnstiles which isn’t going to happen.
Sniffer dogs.We could always just clamp down on people acting like twats. But you can’t stop coke being brought in unless you go full body search at the turnstiles which isn’t going to happen.
what effect do people on sniff have on you?Oh, so thats OK then. We just put up with it,
legally no, you need more than that to perform a legal stop and searchJust cos it's hard to police doesn't mean we shouldn't. Cokeheads acting like twats is a big negative experience. It's not like half of them don't show obvious signs of being sniffed up. Can't the police act on suspicions of being under the influence of drugs? If they have these suspicions maybe they should be able to take them aside and do more thorough searches or demand they be tested?
Sniffer dogs.
I am sorry but I have zero tolerance of illegal use of Class A drugs.
How much crime in this country can be put down to the supply and use of illegal drugs? Quite a lot which affects everybody.what effect do people on sniff have on you?
i bet most of the people who think are on it are just pissed
i'll take as a no you don't have a clue what someone coke actually acts likeHow much crime in this country can be put down to the supply and use of illegal drugs? Quite a lot which affects everybody.
Thanks for putting me straight, Pablo.i'll take as a no you don't have a clue what someone coke actually acts like
also most drug related crime is centred arou8nd opiods
if you want to talk about the "war on drugs" and it's failure and how police tactics actually make things worse then we can
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?