Yes wherever the trunk isAgreed, although if you limit it to the chest of the player being offside, it becomes less ambiguous as it's focussed on one place.
Akinfenwa would have no chanceYes wherever the trunk is
Not a euphemism!!
Your tits are offside, your tits are offside, Akinfenwa, your tits are offside.Akinfenwa would have no chance
Well an elbow wouldn’t be offsideWith such fine margins its difficult to accept a mm offside or should we say your toenail was offside? Common sense must rule. Simply stretch the offside distance to be enough to clearly and visably see 6 inches beyond the last man as the ball is kicked. That is visable to the naked eye in real time movement, but still extremely close to call. VAR would then confirm it was within this tolerance.
The current system is absurd where an elbow is shown to be offside while his feet remain onside? Come on lets have some common sense.
Laws is laws thoughAt end of day whats worse? More goals and art of defence suffers
Or goals dissalowes for a heel offside 3 passes in build up before a goal?
I know which i think is worse
Exactly what I have said too. That Wolves one the other night should clearly have stood.VAR should check and if not immediately obvious to the eye then play on/give the goal.
Then you would just have a couple of strikers hanging around the opponents goal waiting for a big hoof up field.Just bin the offside rule completely...
So should never be changed?Laws is laws though
What about women's football. The focus then could be binary?Agreed, although if you limit it to the chest of the player being offside, it becomes less ambiguous as it's focussed on one place.
Wycombe would win the Premier League and be playing in Europe.Then you would just have a couple of strikers hanging around the opponents goal waiting for a big hoof up field.
That's why the offside rule was introduced in the first place.
Yeah, it would change the game a bit but I'd rather that than listening to a couple of bald fuckers endlessly bitching about 'clear and obvious' on MOTD every week.Then you would just have a couple of strikers hanging around the opponents goal waiting for a big hoof up field.
That's why the offside rule was introduced in the first place.
Let's get back to 1981So should never be changed?
Shall we stop backpass rule?
Have you seen the follicles on ex footballers lately, even Joe Cole has reverted.Yeah, it would change the game a bit but I'd rather that than listening to a couple of bald fuckers endlessly bitching about 'clear and obvious' on MOTD every week.
Two points for this.What about women's football. The focus then could be binary?
I think this point should be emphasized on the Sunderland forum,might soften their opinion.Let's get back to 1981
We'd already be top by 2 points.
Then you would just have a couple of strikers hanging around the opponents goal waiting for a big hoof up field.
That's why the offside rule was introduced in the first place.
I like this idea a lot. Sounds the perfect solution.Remove the lines from the VAR analysis.
If it's not clearly offside then the benefit of the doubt goes to the attacker.
Job done and no need to change any of the footballing laws.
Sent from my I3113 using Tapatalk
Exactly this.VAR should check and if not immediately obvious to the eye then play on/give the goal.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?