he's the only bloke that could head it from corners/throw-ins. We are so much weaker without him.I think people are going a little over the top with the rose tinted specs with Leo. Like we will never be able to get an adequate replacement! Some perspective, he was average first half of the season. Improved in the second. He got his head to a lot of set pieces and should have scored a lot more. He was the worst defender in our squad in terms of distribution. He was caught out of position a fair few times too. I loved his passion and attitude and his goals in the run in will live long in the memories of fans. I do also think those goals have scewed a lot of fans' opinions on how good he is/was. I would have him back, of course, but if you really think over the past season, he was decent, immense; no.
Says it all!Who needs him and his potential anyway. We're after Cranie
My girlfriend was a stunner until she dumped me, ugly mutt.Says it all!
Honestly people on here would of cum in their pants if we'd of signed him, now it looks like it wont happen, they want to break him down.
Talk about fickle ?
I think Rose has the potential to be our best all round defender. His distribution and bringing the ball out of defence is fantastic. Just needs to stay fit
Rose looked way off the pace, 2 own goals as well. His passing is good, and has pace, but I am not sure his defending is up to championship quality
If he is it will be because he’s had a great seasonThe other thing that influences me is the transient nature and churn of modern football. All the players with the potential for significant growth that we sold after a half decent season like Wilson, Maddison, Bayliss, McCallum. It'd just be nice to go on that development journey with them for once, hope we can do that with O'Hare at least, but suspect he'll be gone this time next year.
Not fickle, just an honest assessment of his last season. Talking about how he isn't irreplaceable. Potential isn't relevant discussion in a loan player. We should be able to replace him as a first team player is the clear point.Says it all!
Honestly people on here would of cum in their pants if we'd of signed him, now it looks like it wont happen, they want to break him down.
Talk about fickle ?
Literally nobody has said this! Perhaps read posts properly...Here we have the "nah he was shit anyway" thread
To be fair he missed the header at Rotherham in their box that he thumped in with his fist for the 3 pointsFuck me. Despair on here sometimes.
Name me one, just one time Osti lost an aerial duel last season?
Which parts of my post are incorrect?Fuck me. Despair on here sometimes.
Name me one, just one time Osti lost an aerial duel last season?
If they're going to loan him out it would be to a mid to upper mid table Championship side to aid his progression further.Most are missing the point imo and the hype is obvious.
We wouldn't be getting the same raw player we had 12 months ago. We would be getting a player who got used to the level, was vastly improved at the end of the season, a year older, a year more experienced, strong, pacey, reads the game well and excellent in the air. All the reasons we probably won't get him this time around!
At the end of last season, once we finally had a near full strength squad they proved themselves to be a comfortable mid table team, winning 4 of the last 6. We are 2 or 3 players short of a team at least on a par with last season's which MR has repeatedly said he plans to address.Both him and James will be big losses - the team we have now is weaker than the one that finished the season.
Of course potential is relevant in a loan, just look at how far Osti developed during his spell here.Not fickle, just an honest assessment of his last season. Talking about how he isn't irreplaceable. Potential isn't relevant discussion in a loan player. We should be able to replace him as a first team player is the clear point.
Does that mean your looking at Rose through Ostigard tinted glasses in that caseI think Rose has the potential to be our best all round defender. His distribution and bringing the ball out of defence is fantastic. Just needs to stay fit
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well that's not entirely accurate is it.If he is it will be because he’s had a great season
And far more error prone with Sheaf and hamer playing together. I expect some hidingsBoth him and James will be big losses - the team we have now is weaker than the one that finished the season.
To be fair I don't think the OP was saying that at all and I agree with their view.Here we have the "nah he was shit anyway" thread
To be fair I don't think the OP was saying that at all and I agree with their view.
I liked him and yes he has potential, but I feel people overlooked his weaknesses. I feel McCallum was far better, but didn't get all the hype because he didn't look as passionate and kick corner flags.
Fuck me. Despair on here sometimes.
Name me one, just one time Osti lost an aerial duel last season?
According to WhoScored he lost 1 in 3 of them https://www.whoscored.com/Players/369971/Show/Leo-Østigard
This kind of foaming reaction to what was a very measured opening post shows how warped people’s ideas of some players are. Ostigard is a good, promising player who finished the season strongly and would make our back line a lot better if we signed him again. But he’s not Franco fucking Baresi.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?