Don't think he was fit. Adi had a word as he seemed pissed off.Anyone know why Palmer was taken off. Robins seemed to be having words?
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
As for "Palmer/Hamer would have been another penalty taker", well Eccles scored so nah.
I think we gambled on him when Hamer went off injured. Just to try and give us a bit of flare to try and snatch it in last 10 mins of normal time. I was surprised he even made the bench.Anyone know why Palmer was taken off. Robins seemed to be having words?
Sent from my Pixel 6 using Tapatalk
Kelly deserves a new contract
Arguably because he's been immense since coming back into the side and is a leader. Plus, got to keep someone!Why?
Gus was doing what he does , trying to start quick counters . Problem first half was Allen was too easily bullied and Vik was totally isolatedThought Hamer had one of his worst games in ages today apart from his goal. Was gifting them possession constantly in that first half. Saying that I think we’re probably a Premier League club right now if he’d played 120 minutes.
Arguably because he's been immense since coming back into the side and is a leader. Plus, got to keep someone!
So setting up the same as we did beating Boro at their place and was a large part of us making the playoffs was a balls-up?The way the team was set up in the first half was a balls up by the management,much better in the 2nd half with the change made.In terms of ratings it's tough tbh and irrelevant, several of today's team have played their last game for the club be it loan players or those out of contract or the two that will almost certainly be sold (Gyokeres & Hamer). It will be an interesting summer for sure.
Yes it was a complete balls up,we were playing a totally different team....but as with all things football (fan wise) it's all about opinions, you have yours I have mine ,having two upfront in the second half made a huge difference and actually gave us a foothold in a game that we were getting completely outplayed in, thankfully the management team changed the set up for the 2nd half.So setting up the same as we did beating Boro at their place and was a large part of us making the playoffs was a balls-up?
Not like we had many different options
Yes it was a complete balls up,we were playing a totally different team....but as with all things football (fan wise) it's all about opinions, you have yours I have mine ,having two upfront in the second half made a huge difference and actually gave us a foothold in a game that we were getting completely outplayed in, thankfully the management team changed the set up for the 2nd half.
Very true and as I posted on the match thread moving Norton Cuffy into a central midfield role for the latter part of the first half made a difference... Jamie Allen was piss poor.I think last ten mins if the first half we’d already started getting control of the game TBH. All we needed was to settle our nerves. That said Allen was poor and the change was needed.
It's not about opinions ,you as I am are both posting with hindsight.Yes it was a complete balls up,we were playing a totally different team....but as with all things football (fan wise) it's all about opinions, you have yours I have mine ,having two upfront in the second half made a huge difference and actually gave us a foothold in a game that we were getting completely outplayed in, thankfully the management team changed the set up for the 2nd half.
One thing I hope is learnt today we must start with two strikers we were much better when Godden came on for the second half.
Just one up front encourages opposition midfield forward.
I’m not criticising any individual player they all put shifts in and we didn’t lose, we drew.
Allen worked his nuts off as he usually does but is light weight and was getting swatted by the big Luton midfield, the half-time change worked.
We've been generally better this season with one up front. It's simplistic to say it's negative, it can be more fluid and dynamic when done well.One thing I hope is learnt today we must start with two strikers we were much better when Godden came on for the second half.
Just one up front encourages opposition midfield forward.
I’m not criticising any individual player they all put shifts in and we didn’t lose, we drew.
Allen worked his nuts off as he usually does but is light weight and was getting swatted by the big Luton midfield, the half-time change worked.
I agree, I like the system but the back up behind needs to be better and more productive.We've been generally better this season with one up front. It's simplistic to say it's negative, it can be more fluid and dynamic when done well.
Nah let's be serious he's shit at this level.Allen is not poor, Allen had a poor game. There's a difference.
BollocksNah let's be serious he's shit at this leve
Not shit. But agree with him that he needs to be replaced if we looking to go for promotion consistently.Bollocks
He's just been a key part of a team that's been looking for promotion!Not shit. But agree with him that he needs to be replaced if we looking to go for promotion consistently.
Yeah he's played his part in an over achieving team. Hats off to himHe's just been a key part of a team that's been looking for promotion!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?