cc84cov
Well-Known Member
In fairness sheaf is well ahead of Kelly
In terms of fitness but I prefer sheaf & Hamer in the middle not Hamer right midfield he can play the 3 but closer with 2 up front,O’Hare & Shipley were woeful tonight
In fairness sheaf is well ahead of KellyClearly Kelly polarises this board. He wasn’t shocking but he wasn’t Pirlo either though some on here seem to think so.
He did give the ball away a lot tonight to say otherwise is just denial.
Sheaf gave the ball away early in the game and got criticised by the pundits Kelly did the same twice nothing was said but a better side than Brum would punish us . He was slow to react quite often tonight (maybe due to his lay off) meaning he was stretching so a lot of his passes forward were waist high giving the target player little chance to bring it under control.
Biamou a 6 lol
If Max had them balls in behind the defence as walker did we would have took all three points tonight.
You fell for itSeriously?
If Max had them balls in behind the defence as walker did we would have took all three points tonight.
Yes let's stop being rational and give him a 2 just to make a point eh?Biamou a 6 lol
Attack teams who we on paper will lose against and play for a point against teams around us
Great idea
Agree entirely. it's like Robins thought "we can keep a clean sheet against these" and so was determined to do that for the majority of the game when this may have been a game we'd be able to take on the other team and beat them, as we did QPR. Even then Jukebox should've had a least two before we changed system. Against Barnsley we seemed to do similar, when they at the time couldn't score for toffees. Surely that is a game you accept your defensive weaknesses and focus on your attacking qualities rather than using it as an attempt to secure a clean sheet.
I also have to say that once we changed shape and put on the second striker they were very much in control, but had we done it the other way round and started with the extra striker (and you'd therefore assume spend more time in training focusing on that it may have been different.
Once we changed shape they had clear cut chances we created none
They had a clear cut chance first half also as McCallum positioning is still suspect.Once we changed shape they had clear cut chances we created none
They had a clear cut chance first half also as McCallum positioning is still suspect.
The first half chance was the easiest of them all we got lucky is why we didn’t lose nothing to do with that system we still were dodgy at the back
Once we changed shape they had clear cut chances we created none
They had clear cut chances before G. We did create when Walker was in the clear and played in Max who was sadly nowhere near on the same wavelength.
Are you really blaming Biamou for not getting on the end of the one that Walker played across but hit the first defender defecting it miles away from him?
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
That’s how it looked live but happy to retract when I get a chance to look again
They showed multiple replays, the defender blocked it
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Also lol at you enjoying the first half yesterday because Juke missed a free header
you seem to be suggesting the cross was a chance!
We created zero chances when we changed the system - not one
you seem to be suggesting the cross was a chance!
We created zero chances when we changed the system - not one
Sky Sports co-commentator - ex-professional: 'Cov look far better after switching to 3 at the back and playing their usual game.'
Grendel - who has probably never stepped over the whitewash and onto a pitch: 'so much better with 4 at the back'
Are you really blaming Biamou for not getting on the end of the one that Walker played across but hit the first defender defecting it miles away from him?
Sent from my SM-G965F using Tapatalk
Sky Sports co-commentator - ex-professional: 'Cov look far better after switching to 3 at the back and playing their usual game.'
Grendel - who has probably never stepped over the whitewash and onto a pitch: 'so much better with 4 at the back'
As the commentator noted, Biamou was on the wrong side of the defender.
In that specific scenario, Biamou failed to make any meaningful movement toward either post and the defender was able to come over and cut the pass out. His movement was pretty static and passive in that attacking phase.
As the commentator noted, Biamou was on the wrong side of the defender.
In that specific scenario, Biamou failed to make any meaningful movement toward either post and the defender was able to come over and cut the pass out. His movement was pretty static and passive in that attacking phase.
Fair dos must have had beer goggles
I thought the commentator said he had got on the wrong side of the defender, which is what you want strikers to do. Hence why the block was so good, as Biamou had gotten the wrong side of the other defender.As the commentator noted, Biamou was on the wrong side of the defender.
In that specific scenario, Biamou failed to make any meaningful movement toward either post and the defender was able to come over and cut the pass out. His movement was pretty static and passive in that attacking phase.
Come off it I’m no fan of biamou but he’d never have got that
Come off it I’m no fan of biamou but he’d never have got that
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?