very worried about our pressing game, we can't do it for 90mins we literally ran out of gas as a team and were lucky to win, jury is out on 3-5-2 for me. Also our keep ball when under pressure was very poor
The "press" was exceptional for the first 30 - 40 minutes , Gills didn't get a second on the ball.
then quite rightly like you said we couldn't maintain it, perhaps this is where we can make better use of substitutions to maintain the pressure ?
i've seen gillingham play quite a bit, they are usually garbage, they really used the atmosphere to there advantage and finishing aside were excellent, id take their winger mcglashen
gillingham are a lower mid table side at best
i've seen gillingham play quite a bit, they are usually garbage, they really used the atmosphere to there advantage and finishing aside were excellent, id take their winger mcglashen
Mcglashen looked very good, blistering pace and a real handful , haven't we got a speed merchant in Coulaby currently injured apologies for the spelling.
He's fit. Was on the bench.
Allsop - 7 - Did what was asked of him, and was hardly tested. Decent close range save in the second half.
Clarke - 7 - Not convinced about him going forward but he did we defensively, especially under pressure.
Willis - 8 - Looks an good centre back in the making, solid defensively.
Webster - 7 - Decent, did his job. We kept a clean sheet so all the defence did their job today.
Johnson - 7 - Can look a bit of a donkey at time but he wins everything in the air. Valuable at set pieces.
Haynes - 8 - Excellent first half, did very well for the goal and always in space. Gillingham seemed to adapt their game plan a bit in the second half to combat him and he got less of the play but still a very good performance.
Fleck - 8 - Is he even the same fat lad we signed from Rangers? Never stopped running, and controlled a lot of our play.
Thomas - 5 - Disappointing, while I appreciate the tidiness of his play there is a certain lethargy that frustrates. He just seems to take a second too long thinking about every pass and then when he acts instinctively we get that tame shot right at the goalkeeper.
O'Brien - 7 - A lot of running, and a lot of good runs in attacking positions that weren't picked up. Finishing could be improved.
Tudgay - 5 - Also disappointing, just seemed to be missing something. I thought he was decent against MK Dons with a lot less support but tonight he didn't ever really get into the game.
Nouble - 7 - Did the one thing asked of him and scored.
McQuoid - 5 - A lot of running and flicks but not much else. Wasn't helped by our lack of urgency in the last 15 minutes.
Hines - N/A
Finch - N/A
Thomas 4 - Goes sideways, backwards but never forward. Awful player, absolutely awful.
.
5 for Thomas?????? Your having a laugh fella, yes he faded a little towards the end and for that I'd give him seven otherwise first half was as good as I've seen him play in a while.
Isn't it great to be talking about football rather than court cases, finances, legal matters, fairycastle stadiums etc. For what its worth I thought there were 11 heroes on the pitch but more importantly 28,000 off it. But just to keep the talk football related:
Allsopp - 6 - had little to do and what he did he didn't do well. Doesn't command his box and almost cost a goal at the end but hey a clean sheet is a clean sheet
Clarke - 7 - worked hard, covered up and down the line brilliantly, great defensively supporting Willis not so effective going forward
Willis - 8 - A real star in the making, tough, cool, reads game well - great effort
Webster - 7 - No nonsense display - if it need to be in row z then thats where it goes. Looks much better with Reda along side him
Johnson - 8 - Imagine opponents are knackered just trying to run round him! Not the quickest but didn't miss a header and lead by example
Haynes - 8 - Brilliant first half going forward, couple of superb crosses, always willing to go forward, defensively still has a lot to learn but a potential star
Thomas - 7 - Great first half, always the one making runs into the box from midfield, worked his socks off, some brilliant cross field passes Starting to look like the player we always thought he could be
Fleck - 8 - Great all round display, better fitness = better performance on pitch - football is a simple game! Could have had goal of the season!
O'Brien - 7 - covered every blade of grass and non grass on the pitch - all action display.
Tudgay - 5 - tried and tried but it was one of those nights where his second touch was usually a tackle. Simply not his night
Nouble - 7 - Held ball up well, linked with midfield, took his goal with class - surprised it was him who was subbed and not Tudgay but maybe he was knackered
Fans - 10.5 - What an emotional night full of smiles, hope and expectation. Great noise all night
What absolute tosh. Has he shagged your missus or something?
I've just watched back the first half, which confirmed my view from last night that Thomas was excellent first half. He played numerous forward passes in that half including putting nouble through which was well defended, the goal where he controlled and did a nice forwards cushioned volley to o'brien, not to mention several forward passes to the strikers feet, oh and the 50 yard pint point pass over the defence to o'brien before he went off. In fact I was surprised at how positive he was possession, the half time highlights showed Thomas was involved in everything positive we did in the first half.
He dropped off second half and had a poor 5-10 spell where he gave the ball away obviously knackered and should have been subbed before that. But you're criticism is just bizarre.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
Allsop 6 - Made one good save from the angle, the lad is slowing building in confidence as he gets use to playing week in week out.
Clarke 6 - Solid defensively for the most, however as we've already seen this season he isn't a right wing back and offers us nothing going forward. The wing back in a 5-3-2 is key to the teams attacking prowess, with Clarke we don't have any and this is to the detriment of the team.
Willis 7 - Solid.
Webster 7 - For once rather solid.
Reda 8 - You won't find a better centre half at this level, which makes me all the more convinced that we could play 4-4-2 now and still be defensively solid with a Reda and Hines/Willis pairing.
Haynes 7 - The lad has some potential, however although he swung in a few decent balls and set up the goal, as a wing back he needs to be getting forward more and attacking his man a hell of a lot more for the system to work.
O'Brien 7 - Getting better every time I see him, always looking to turn and go forward with the ball.
Thomas 4 - Goes sideways, backwards but never forward. Awful player, absolutely awful.
Fleck 7 - Superb tonight in everything he did, needs to be afforded more options going forward so we can really utilise his creativity.
Tudgay 6 - So isolated in the formation, great at holding the ball up but he gets literally no support and ends up going backwards.
Nouble 6 - See Tudgay plus decent finish for the goal.
It was a much needed win, however yet again I'm not convinced with the formation. I had a mate from uni with me at the game who played for Norwich at all academy levels and plays a decent level of non-league football. Like me he thought it was a scrappy 1-0 win in which there wasn't much to rave about like some seem to be. He was also perplexed at how we were set up, saying that you aren't going to get much change out of that performance for the rest of the season as the same things will keep happening. That the ball will go into the strikers who then have to rely on their ability to beat 2/3 men in and around them or they will either lose the ball or play it backwards. That when the strikers get the ball they need a CAM or full back going beyond to make the system work, which didn't happen tonight. We try and play short from the back but the ball just ends up going back and forth between the back five and midfield three, until someone either attempts to play a through ball through the eye of a needle or we go back to the centre half/keeper who hoofs it up the pitch and we lose possession
How many times did O'Brien or Fleck turnover the ball, run forward and yet have no one to play a forward ball too. We afforded Gillingham far too much easy possession, granted they didn't do much with it (mainly due to Kedwell missing who would have given our defenders a battle) but better teams in this league will punish us.
This is a play-off squad we have and we could easily be beating teams 2/3/4-0 if we set up in a more creative system. At the moment we create 2/3 chances a game, the strikers don't get service and the defence have to deal with huge amounts of pressure which can't be sustained over a season.
Overall it was a great occasion and a solid win, however a bit of realism from some is needed. If we continue to play this way we WILL come unstuck and I can't see us going up. I also saw people on twitter absolutely creaming themselves over Haynes, some calling Pressley the messiah and others lauding a fantastic performance. We need to come down off from this overhype/overly critical stance many seem to take, some can't see for looking and need (like Pressley will no doubt be telling his players) to take one game at a time.
Next game versus Yeovil
Allsop
Phillips Hines Johnson Haynes
O'Brien Swanson Fleck Coulibaly
Nouble Jackson
Pace, power and creativity, (Whilst being defensively solid) Wolves did it last year, nothing special 4-4-2 get the ball to the wingers who constantly supply good forwards who score goals who win games of football convincingly.
Someone's just given him a 4!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - so please excuse any spelling or grammar errors
I'll have a rewatch later and get back to you, he definitely had a stinker second half,
I would if I was you considering you actually think Tudgay has contributed more to the teams performance than Conor Thomas he was by far the worst city player on the pitch.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?