What I meant was I didn't feel he offered much going forward. Everytime he got forward he kept passing back and then we're back to square one.Lorentzon is too defensively minded?
Apart from when he should have had an assist?What I meant was I didn't feel he offered much going forward. Everytime he got forward he kept passing back and then we're back to square one.
My personal opinion of course.
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
Yeah second half he was making strikers runs.If anything Lorentzon gets to far forward to quickly and set one point was in the forward line and probably thought no need to rush back as Fleck is about forty yards behind me scratching his Arse.
Yeah second half he was making strikers runs.
Rcc 6
Lorentzson 5
Martin 6
Stephens 5
Rickets 5
Vincelot 4
Fleck 4
Jones 6
Cole 5
Murphy 5
Fortune 5
Tudgay 5
Lameires 4
Thomas 5
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
What? Totally the opposite I would say. He spent more time in the opposition box than he did in ours!What I meant was I didn't feel he offered much going forward. Everytime he got forward he kept passing back and then we're back to square one.
My personal opinion of course.
Sent from my E5823 using Tapatalk
What? Totally the opposite I would say. He spent more time in the opposition box than he did in ours!
He also set up Murphy for the chance with a lay off on the 6 yard box, which Murphy should have scored. He set up Fortune in the area with a great pass, but Fortune was just offside and he slid a ball in for Cole to have a shot too, again in the penalty box.
He offers loads going forwards. It's his defensive game that isn't as good as it should be.
One negative I noticed about him is that when he is forwards he is not the quickest at getting back.Agree with this. He certainly looked a promising full back attacking wise. He tried to make something happen and could have had an assist.
I'd say he's doing well to stake a claim for a new contract, if that's what he wants.
One negative I noticed about him is that when he is forwards he is not the quickest at getting back.
Get the feeling that TM will not be offering him a contract.
I think he looks like he will fit the bill. Just don't think TM rates him.He also put some good tackles in, he didn't fly in but he managed to dispossess their players a few times but then start an attack from it.
I think he looks like he will fit the bill. Just don't think TM rates him.
Couldn't understand why TM subbed him yesterday...his support of Jones was giving us our best outlet. Like Otis I suspect TM doesn't fully trust him yet but I hope he gets a contract
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
He was doing that. I reckon he was more in the opposition box than any other City player.Everytime Jones got it, Lorentzon would run into the space to try and get the ball like he should have. Instead of running to the corner flag he was running towards the goal.
I am not sure why he wouldn't trust him, he played much better than the experienced Captain on the other side.
Everytime Jones got it, Lorentzon would run into the space to try and get the ball like he should have. Instead of running to the corner flag he was running towards the goal.
I am not sure why he wouldn't trust him, he played much better than the experienced Captain on the other side.
He was doing that. I reckon he was more in the opposition box than any other City player.
I thought Lorentzson and Jones down the right was the only decent thing all night. Seemed to have a good understanding of each other.
What frustrated me was MAF would get the ball out wide, sometimes in a good position. You'd look on the box and no one would be their only 4 defenders. Why did Murphy not look up an see MAF out wide so if he's there who's in the box?? That could be me... No he was still strolling along.
some understanding, "jones you stick by the halfway line cos im running upfront to play as a striker! and if i get that ball i am gonna pass it back to you immeditley!"
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?