Player Ratings (1 Viewer)

KG7 · Aug 6, 2016

Thought we looked decent in the first half but tired in the second.

RCC - 6 barely had anything to do
Willis - 7 solid.
Ricketts - 7 calm and composed
Harries - 8 very classy, strong and good anticipation
Kelly-Evans - 7 - looked good going forward and tackling back. Got caught out a couple of times but they were targeting his lack of height with cross field long balls.
Haynes - 5 good going forward. Looks scared on the pitch
Vlad - 6 - a couple of good moments
Rose - 5 - not strong enough to be a midfield enforcer
Jones - 8 - our best outlet until he got kicked relentlessly. We need a plan for this
Thomas - 6 - good running and clever play. Marked down for the one on one
Sordell - 6 - looked good to me but made a few poor decisions

Reid - 5 (not match fit)
K Thomas - 5 did nothing (not match fit)
Lame iras - 6

Biggest areas of concern for me are midfield - No guile or strength on the basis of today, and a goal scorer.

Defence looks solid but won't last the season so backup needed (or better still better quality to come in ahead of what we've got.

If we add a couple of quality players we'll be in a good position.

There was a 6'1 blond guy sat in the stands with stokes, leaghy and Lawton...potentially a new signing...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ccfcway · Aug 6, 2016

To have 2 8/10 showed how well some played, especially the kids.

Thanks for the 6" 1 info, here we go again with a height based quiz !

SkyBlueRuffian · Aug 6, 2016

SISU 0/10

the players ratings are irrelevant

KG7 · Aug 6, 2016

ccfcway said:
To have 2 8/10 showed how well some played, especially the kids.

Thanks for the 6" 1 info, here we go again with a height based quiz !

I've gotta be honest mate, it was only a rough estimate!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

FRY-CCFC · Aug 6, 2016

RCC - 6
Willis - 7
Ricketts -7
Harries - 8
DKE - 6
Haynes - 3
Gadzhev - 5
Rose - 5
Jones - 8
Sordell - 6
Thomas - 6

Subs:

Thomas - 5
Lameiras - 5
Reid - 6

Ryan Haynes was not good going forward. He failed to beat his man once all game.

ccfcway · Aug 6, 2016

so it could be 6"2 or 6" ?

That opens up a lot of avenues

ccfcway · Aug 6, 2016

I have been one to criticise Haynes in the past, but its not his fault he was selected today. He will be "rested" when McCann is not supended

KG7 · Aug 6, 2016

FRY-CCFC said:
RCC - 6
Willis - 7
Ricketts -7
Harries - 8
DKE - 6
Haynes - 3
Gadzhev - 5
Rose - 5
Jones - 8
Sordell - 6
Thomas - 6

Subs:

Thomas - 5
Lameiras - 5
Reid - 6

Ryan Haynes was not good going forward. He failed to beat his man once all game.

He beat his man two or three times.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Terry Gibson's perm · Aug 6, 2016

KG7 said:
I've gotta be honest mate, it was only a rough estimate!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Was it Leonard Brody in a blonde wig and stiletto's

Pipehitterz · Aug 6, 2016

T

FRY-CCFC said:
RCC - 6
Willis - 7
Ricketts -7
Harries - 8
DKE - 6
Haynes - 3
Gadzhev - 5
Rose - 5
Jones - 8
Sordell - 6
Thomas - 6

Subs:

Thomas - 5
Lameiras - 5
Reid - 6

Ryan Haynes was not good going forward. He failed to beat his man once all game.

Take a point off rose and gadzhev
Give k thomas 2
Then agree with the rest of this

Middle 2 weren't even in the races today
Kelly evans faded terribly after half time

G thomas just isn't ' it '

Nick · Aug 6, 2016

ccfcway said:
To have 2 8/10 showed how well some played, especially the kids.

Thanks for the 6" 1 info, here we go again with a height based quiz !

This guy? 6 foot!

ccfcway · Aug 6, 2016

is it McBean ?

robbiekeane · Aug 6, 2016

Interesting that I'm hearing good things about cian harries, and the defense in general, which was the focal point of everyone's ranting about how unprepared we were and were going to get hammered.

Seems they were pretty solid, we hit the post twice, George Thomas fluffed a one on one, we had 6 corners, and only lost 1-0 to Swindon.

Not bad for an inevitable apocalypse

KG7 · Aug 6, 2016

Yes looked like that guy

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ccfcway · Aug 6, 2016

robbiekeane said:
Interesting that I'm hearing good things about cian harries, and the defense in general, which was the focal point of everyone's ranting about how unprepared we were and were going to get hammered.

Seems they were pretty solid, we hit the post twice, George Thomas fluffed a one on one, we had 6 corners, and only lost 1-0 to Swindon.

Not bad for an inevitable apocalypse

this. A draw would have been a good result

ccfcway · Aug 6, 2016

KG7 said:
Yes looked like that guy

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fab

McBean has the recipe to make toast of League One

ccfchoi87 · Aug 6, 2016

KG7 said:
Thought we looked decent in the first half but tired in the second.

RCC - 6 barely had anything to do
Willis - 7 solid.
Ricketts - 7 calm and composed
Harries - 8 very classy, strong and good anticipation
Kelly-Evans - 7 - looked good going forward and tackling back. Got caught out a couple of times but they were targeting his lack of height with cross field long balls.
Haynes - 5 good going forward. Looks scared on the pitch
Vlad - 6 - a couple of good moments
Rose - 5 - not strong enough to be a midfield enforcer
Jones - 8 - our best outlet until he got kicked relentlessly. We need a plan for this
Thomas - 6 - good running and clever play. Marked down for the one on one
Sordell - 6 - looked good to me but made a few poor decisions

Reid - 5 (not match fit)
K Thomas - 5 did nothing (not match fit)
Lame iras - 6

Biggest areas of concern for me are midfield - No guile or strength on the basis of today, and a goal scorer.

Defence looks solid but won't last the season so backup needed (or better still better quality to come in ahead of what we've got.

If we add a couple of quality players we'll be in a good position.

There was a 6'1 blond guy sat in the stands with stokes, leaghy and Lawton...potentially a new signing...

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Could it have been lee Burge?

Nick · Aug 6, 2016

robbiekeane said:
Interesting that I'm hearing good things about cian harries, and the defense in general, which was the focal point of everyone's ranting about how unprepared we were and were going to get hammered.

Seems they were pretty solid, we hit the post twice, George Thomas fluffed a one on one, we had 6 corners, and only lost 1-0 to Swindon.

Not bad for an inevitable apocalypse

I thought that, good to hear that he had a good game.

It was the positions that we were prepared for that we lacked in from the sounds of it..up front.

Nick · Aug 6, 2016

ccfchoi87 said:
Could it have been lee Burge?

he was on the bench I think.

Nick · Aug 6, 2016

KG7 said:
Yes looked like that guy

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Number 9 then...

KG7 · Aug 6, 2016

Wasn't lee burge. Looked like the guy in the photo but he had a stubbly little beard. Can't say 100% though

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nick · Aug 6, 2016

Like this?

KG7 · Aug 6, 2016

Can't say in that picture. Looked more like the other one...same guy?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Nick · Aug 6, 2016

KG7 said:
Can't say in that picture. Looked more like the other one...same guy?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yeah, just that one was a few days ago

SkyBlue_Bear83 · Aug 6, 2016

Is that Jack McBean?

KG7 · Aug 6, 2016

What were the city fans behind the goal getting wound up about?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

ps1948 · Aug 6, 2016

Their keeper

ps1948 · Aug 6, 2016

How about marks for the Ref - 3 - I thought he was poor (nothing unusual in that), and didn't give us any benefit of the doubt, while letting them get away with quite a bit. Bringing Sordell off at half-time to avoid a potential sending-off illustrates the point - he was getting kicked all over the place, although his "tackle" where he got booked was not a good one.

KG7 · Aug 6, 2016

ps1948 said:
How about marks for the Ref - 3 - I thought he was poor (nothing unusual in that), and didn't give us any benefit of the doubt, while letting them get away with quite a bit. Bringing Sordell off at half-time to avoid a potential sending-off illustrates the point - he was getting kicked all over the place, although his "tackle" where he got booked was not a good one.

Yeah he was terrible

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Liquid Gold · Aug 6, 2016

Speaking to a Swindon fan after the game he said that our defence looked pretty solid and out no10 was great.

KG7 · Aug 6, 2016

Their number 2 was the best player on the pitch and their other centre back were forever pulling Sordell, Jones and Thomas back while they were tying to break

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

italiahorse · Aug 6, 2016

RCC - 6 Nothing to do. Always played it short.
Willis - 7 Seemed solid in defence
Ricketts -7 Again solid
Harries - 8 Best player on day
DKE - 6 Rounded easily in second half but persistent in chasing down players.
Haynes - 4 Lacking confidence always seemed short of time.
Gadzhev - 5 Part of a weak midfield
Rose - 4 Didn't do a lot really. Expect more from a midfielder
Jones - 6 Seemed dangerous but never came to anything
Sordell - 6 Seemed solid and should be good at this level
Thomas - 5 Seems lively but never going to score

Subs:

Thomas - 5 Average but maybe due to fitness
Lameiras - 5 Seemed lightweight. I think he should be better than this.
Reid - 5 Didn't do a lot really

AFCCOVENTRY · Aug 6, 2016

Was this the guy?

AFCCOVENTRY · Aug 6, 2016

stevefloyd · Aug 6, 2016

Good to hear Harries had a good game

Player Ratings (1 Viewer)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Administrator

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Administrator

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Users who are viewing this thread

Privacy & Transparency

Privacy & Transparency