Is there any other career where you get sacked for being useless at your job and get paid 18 months salary?
I thought it was usual that even if you did get a payout you only got it until you were back in employment so unless nobody else will give him a job we shouldn't be on the hook for 18 months of paying him should we?
Is there any other career where you get sacked for being useless at your job and get paid 18 months salary?
I thought it was usual that even if you did get a payout you only got it until you were back in employment so unless nobody else will give him a job we shouldn't be on the hook for 18 months of paying him should we?
Yep it will give Alan Poole something else to simper about, in his next installment of Alan's waffle, where he sits in what looks very similar to a prison cell with his buddy Andy Turner, and tells us all how hard done by Pressley was.
Is there any other career where you get sacked for being useless at your job and get paid 18 months salary?
I thought it was usual that even if you did get a payout you only got it until you were back in employment so unless nobody else will give him a job we shouldn't be on the hook for 18 months of paying him should we?
Is there any other career where you get sacked for being useless at your job and get paid 18 months salary?
Can he not be done for fraud?
at the end of the day SP signed a contract in good faith , at the time his stock was rising, and the incentive for the club was that they had him locked in for 4 years or a decent compensation payout should he elect to go and CCFC were rising through the leagues. It seemed to be the one bit of long term planning that SISU did.
As we know things didn't pan out for either party, SP was determined to continue but the club had other ideas and he seemed genuinely upset at losing the job. Irrespective of what anyone thinks this is not performance related pay , the severance package would have been agreed up front so for SISU to appear to renege is a pretty poor show and given SISU's record i am not surprised that he has felt the need to test it in court.
The one worrying thing is that he may end up forcing another admin if there is not enough cash in the club to settle this and keep it running , i would suspect that a cash injection from SISU would be required , which as the auditors said at the time of the last accounts unless SISU fund the losses then the club cannot trade. At that time SISU agreed to fund the losses but back then they were not expecting to have to run the club and payout SP.
This could decide if TM sees a future with CCFC if there is even less money to rebuild
I suppose this will be another excuse, its somebody else gov...
Worrying times
Interesting thought.
if so, might it apply to anyone else at the club?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?