Awful first touch though. I was slightly disappointed by him tbh.
What? He laid it off really well I felt
And even tho he's big he has a poachers instinct in his runs
Diff to MCG but could be just as effective
Jordan Clarke not Leon!
Did he slate him for shouting and moaning while the ball was slowly rolling in without trying to dive? Not sure he would have even got it but at least give it a go and get dirty!
Anyone fancy taking a look at Preston's forum? This is the moment when the winner went in.
http://www.pne-online.net/forum/
showthread.php?78310-Match-Day-Thread-Coventry-v-PNE-JPT-10-01-13-KO-19-45-pm./page36
AHAHAHAHAHA
Oh! Jordan was fecking crap I agree
Anyone fancy taking a look at Preston's forum? This is the moment when the winner went in.
http://www.pne-online.net/forum/showthread.php?78310-Match-Day-Thread-Coventry-v-PNE-JPT-10-01-13-KO-19-45-pm./page36
AHAHAHAHAHA
Oh! Jordan was fucking crap I agree
Oh! Jordan was fucking crap I agree
fqact is jordan clarke could be 30 and playing the same, the fans would still say "oh hes an cademy kid,give him time"
he didnt play very well, some good back headers and a one sublime assist but other than that nothing, he tried a 360 roulette trick in own box when he should ahve cleared it, he lost the ball everytime he tried to skin someone, his passes were intercepted regulary, hell even just before final whilstle he tried to take ona palyer and halfwayline and got beat,if the ball hadnt trickled out for a throw in they may have had 1 more chance on goal
can he have good games? yeh. but they are few and far inbetween
how long do we give him? 23 years old? 25?..................30?
Do just one thing for me to realise you are biased against the lad. Watch the highlights and count how many times he beat a man. I assure you he didn't lose the ball everytime and that is why I don't rate your opinion on him
oh maybe he beat his man once or twice...he still lost it more than not
but i will rewatch for you
but the fact you are kissing his ass so hard makes me thing your are bias
oh maybe he beat his man once or twice...he still lost it more than not
but i will rewatch for you
but the fact you are kissing his ass so hard makes me thing your are bias
If it wasn't for that great touch at the end of the game we would be out. Not saying he never made any mistakes, but to me he did more good than bad. When we went forward he was involved more often than not. But if you are looking for the negatives all the time it is so easy to miss the positives.
this is what angers me]
i am CLEARLY not looking for negatives am i,considering i have outlined the positive stuff he done
the fact you say more good than bad makes me think you are looking for any reason to give him a "pass" grade. why?
You and LJC say he was poor, he wasn't.
He, on the whole, played well, didn't get ripped, put in some good crosses, some good headers back to Murphy under pressure, tracked his winger well, putting in good tackles. However, he did have a couple of wobbly moments but didn't cost us.
I know who's opinion I trust, MR's... And I guess we'll see what Robins' opinion is when we're away to Carlisle, if he thought Clarke played badly, Christie will come in for him... Simple.
you say he did well...he didnt:facepalm::facepalm::facepalm:
what a stupid comment you make,this is a forum,look through this whole thread, there alot of people who agree with me about clarke
so dont dismiss so many peoples views because they are different to yours.
I'm not though.
Had it been Christie instead if Clarke, who played exactly the same game, did the exact same things, your lot would be in Christie's arse.
Serious vendettas against Clarke. But MR will pick him v Carlisle which will put this argument to bed really, because MR knows better than you, as he doesn't hold petty vendettas.
Christie has played poor last 4 games he's played, and paid the price.
this is what angers me]
i am CLEARLY not looking for negatives am i,considering i have outlined the positive stuff he done
the fact you say more good than bad makes me think you are looking for any reason to give him a "pass" grade. why?
When a player is supposedly shit it means they have cost us goals and not helped the team in any way. Our defence played well. Clarke was a part of this. We attacked well on the break. Clarke was a part of this. Yes he made a couple of mistakes. He also did good things in the game. If he hadn't done good things like cutting out dangerous crosses and breaking down attacks as well as not helping with the attacks and setting up our second goal which kept us in the game at the death I would agree with you and say he had a shit game. Not the best player on the pitch, but he certainly played his part.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?