Terrible role modelling by the police. Would like to see the police give tickets out and make an example of him. Also looks like insurance details weren’t exchanged and no apology made. Very strange
They won’t have insurance. The crown will be self insured and should pick up any claims.Terrible role modelling by the police. Would like to see the police give tickets out and make an example of him. Also looks like insurance details weren’t exchanged and no apology made. Very strange
He should get a careless driving conviction if he’s pulled out in the other car. I know I would get one if I’d have pulled out on someone and they’d broke their wrist as a result. I think he might just hand in his licence to avoid the publicity.
I trust they’ll be a picture of her with a vert sad face on to go with the story.The woman who broke her arm is now all over the media saying she didn't even receive a card and bunch of flowers from the royals.
It's a shame celebrity big brother has finished else she would be a favourite to go in
I trust they’ll be a picture of her with a vert sad face on to go with the story.
Sad face- check £5000Standard
Shocking, can’t believe he’s out driving again and without a seatbelt but has only ‘been spoken to’.
Shouldn’t he be cautioned for leaving the scene of an accidentThey won’t have insurance. The crown will be self insured and should pick up any claims.
Wasn't the picture taken on the Sandringham estate, not a public road?
I also don't like the idea that he automatically shouldn't be driving just because he's 97. He, and everybody else, should be made to pass a test to prove their ability above a certain age, say 70, but to just say you can't drive because you're that age isn't fair. I'd expect 99.99% of people that age to fail dismally, and he may well prove to be one of them, but competence should be the deciding factor, not age.
Shouldn’t he be cautioned for leaving the scene of an accident
I don’t think I said he automatically shouldn’t driving due to his age, did I?
Standard
I know the person responsible for speed limits in Norfolk police. The decision to reduce the speed limit was taken some months ago and was ready to implement. Purely a coincidence.Reading around it, I find it slightly insulting that there have been 6 fatalities on that stretch in the last 6 years (I think) but as soon as the old fella is involved in a crash that’s when they decide the speed limit should be reduced. What kind of message does it send out to the families of those who have lost their lives on that road in the past?
Was the original decision in relation to old duffers pulling out unexpectantly onto the main road causing drivers to brake?I know the person responsible for speed limits in Norfolk police. The decision to reduce the speed limit was taken some months ago and was ready to implement. Purely a coincidence.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?