No doubt confidentiality clauses have been signed!
When will people realise, Sisu are very on the ball when it comes to legals!
No clauses will have been signed. Why would ACL sign them?
Doubt it Otis. The lease has broken and they are now free of each other. Yet, they still desperately need each other to survive.
The truth needs to come out though.
In the years to come we need to be able to look back and know who did what in the destruction of our club.
The truth requires big legal bills though.
Are the winners prepared to foot them, as chances are the losers will find themselves in no position to pay their costs after all.
and if the winners aren't prepared to foot them, are we as fans prepared to underwrite them?
Even if this meant, potentially, SISU coming out as 'winners' in such cases?
Someone from ACL was saying that they hoped Appleton would come back with newer terms to get a deal done, but if we've actually been deducted the points already that might have passed.
Have we lost the points already or is it just confirmation of 'when liquidated, -10'?
Someone from ACL was saying that they hoped Appleton would come back with newer terms to get a deal done, but if we've actually been deducted the points already that might have passed.
Have we lost the points already or is it just confirmation of 'when liquidated, -10'?
Liquidation enables an entirely new lease agreement to be drawn up with Otium/Holdings-at least that's what I'm clutching to.
And that's where pressure and the discourse should now be focussed.
But where is this call for talks from the Trust?
Where are the fans rising up to repeat the message of a successful march that they want both sides to talk to one another to make sure Coventry City remains in Coventry?
Instead there's a bunch of divisive bickering, and a desire to play the blame game.
There's now no excuse for ACL to not go straight to TF and put forward a deal and there is equally no excuse for TF or SISU to bluntly reject it. The idea put forward by OSB would in theory work very well for both sides and represents a good starting point.
Fisher has said he'd like to talk to them, so now's the time to make sure he sticks to that, and make sure the other side agree to talk also.
Instead we're sat here on a sunny Saturday morning deciding who's right and wrong in a process of financial law.
I'm more keen to see if we can rescue this third Test.
I went to the Cheltenham festival the other week. Baking hot, nearly roasted alive in my seat...
But nice to see games played on the same backdrop they were when WG Grace was playing. Something about tradition and the past that trumps financial law every time.
I'll say this for the current situation, I've been to places, and seen sports that I hadn't up to now, and it's been quite fun!
Didn't used to be hugely into cricket but over the last few years have gotten quite into it. Plus the Bears are probably the only chance of sporting success for the region every year!
I still can't get into cricket. I can watch it happily, but it doesn't grab me.
Coventry Bees too.
Although was interested to see their owner complaining that his bidget was lower, now that the team had to pay rent, and got no cash from the pies.
History repeating itself?
Struggling for others as I don't count the ice hockey, given it's a franchise...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?