Nick
Administrator
With all respect, I think putting these rumors to bed would be a better option wouldn't they?
I hope they have more class than to respond to this thread
I hope they have more class than to respond to this thread
With all respect, I think putting these rumors to bed would be a better option wouldn't they?
Most of us are paid up trust members so it is essential they respond. I would say as this paints jan in a negative light towards Elliot and other trust members this is possibly a leak from someone inside the trust to show him in a negating light.
Whatever the level of animosity that exists the trust hierarchy have to maintain cordial relations with the club or it just becomes an irrelevant protest group. I would suggest the more intelligent members of the trust accept this.
Most of us are paid up trust members so it is essential they respond. I would say as this paints jan in a negative light towards Elliot and other trust members this is possibly a leak from someone inside the trust to show him in a negating light.
Whatever the level of animosity that exists the trust hierarchy have to maintain cordial relations with the club or it just becomes an irrelevant protest group. I would suggest the more intelligent members of the trust accept this.
And you think this is the forum to respond?
Really?
The Trust like to insult other people and ask long lists of questions but they refuse to answer questions about there own behaviour insulting City fans, being abusive and supporting ACL."
Quite simply another case of "pot, kettle & black".
Abuse is a very subjective thing. There are thousands of fans that feel they have been have been abused & insulted by contemptuous lying (or some may call it mis-information), selling players, taking the club from the City, disputes in court with their elected Council - & a respected charity, withholding rightfully owed payments using the name of their club in doing it. Others such as the names listed in MLs apparent (it may or may not be genuine) may feel similarly abused by the words which designed to discredit them!
And for the record before anyone goes for my throat about supporting whatever...I support SP & staff in putting out a team that represent the name CCFC in the way I can respect. I am in no way actively supportive of ACL or SBT...maybe NOPM, yes because I will not part with any cash that goes relatively directly to SISU (or any of their tentacles)
PUSB
To be honest, I think in the past few months the "house" has started to get more in order with the Trust hasn't it?
Oh dear! There is a leak
Don't see anything wrong with that to be fair (If what they say is True, which I am sure Jan will answer)
Is this the same one as the other day I take it? What did jan bcc in Simon about?
The trust's silence on these issues is worrying but hopefully Jan can put these claims to bed
This is what we covered here http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-director-accused-underhand-6841703
The email I was BCCd into was the invitation from the Trust to host a forum to discuss the club's accounts.
Perhaps it wasn't the best way to do it, but as media officer it's not really a surprise Jan wanted to let me know about the invitation. Surely that's his job?
I also didn't contact Mr Labovitch until after he'd responded to Jan. So it wasn't like we caught him on the hop. He'd already decided to turn down the invitation.
All a bit of a distraction from the wider issues affecting CCFC.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Is that the same email that you had in regards to that article?
The email at the start of this thread is what we covered here http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-director-accused-underhand-6841703
The original story on the invite to the forum is here http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-turn-down-sky-6798976
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That is what i thought, was just confirming it was the same email you reported on
Looks the same as the one we were leaked. Couldn't say if it's word for word the same until I'm in the office. Looks like not though.
And before you ask, I genuinely don't know who leaked it to us!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Interesting if it has been "doctored" too from the one actually sent.
Sorry. Typo corrected. "It" rather than "not"!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry. Typo corrected. "It" rather than "not"!
This is what we covered here http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-city-director-accused-underhand-6841703
The email I was BCCd into was the invitation from the Trust to host a forum to discuss the club's accounts.
Perhaps it wasn't the best way to do it, but as media officer it's not really a surprise Jan wanted to let me know about the invitation. Surely that's his job?
I also didn't contact Mr Labovitch until after he'd responded to Jan. So it wasn't like we caught him on the hop. He'd already decided to turn down the invitation.
All a bit of a distraction from the wider issues affecting CCFC.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That's how wars begin!
Question for Mr Labovitch, which I hope will be answered because it's a far bigger issue than a squabble with the Trust over BCCing an email to someone:
What is going to happen if we don't get planning permission for the new stadium?
Mr Eakin on his radio programme asked you this question and you didn't answer it - you talked a bit about Brighton and the Amex/Falmer ground but you didn't answer the question which is in serious need of an answer. If we don't get planning permission what is the back up plan - More years at Sixfields, Upgrade the rugby club ground to league standards, make ACL an offer that is reasonable, cut your losses and fold the club? Those of us that don't think a return to the Ricoh is likely are banking on the new stadium as the only way to return to the Coventry area (and that for all I know may only be me) would like to know what the back up plan is.
I don't think this is a particularly difficult question and it would help set my mind at rest that there is a plan and we know what that plan is. Never mind that we haven't seen any plans for the new stadium yet, we need planning permission before building work can start on that.
So please Mr Labovitch (I'm happy to take the response from HoundDog1987 if that is the preferred way you like to communicate, through a third party) but what is the answer?
James all questions that were asked but not answered in that interview need asking at every opportunity until answered.
This type of thing should be ignored until the real issues are answered.
Also when is this forum we were promised?
I'm sure this must be a hoax. The writer of this email is not very good at written English - incorrectly spelling with homophones and ranting style - also the odd tautology I noticed (bccing without my knowledge). Surely someone in a senior position at the club is more intelligent/better educated than this.
Seems Mark is again throwing innuendo out about all and sundry again.
Sounds very much like toe the line or else.
Sorry Mark, we don't trust a word you say.
Sorry Mark, we don't trust a word you say.
It can be defamatory under Parliamentary Privelege, just you can't do anything about it.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?