So you are complaining about a Coventry fan (trying to break this deadlock) complaining about not getting answers from the owners , like I said before you and others are in a corner now and will just argue anything, very very sadHe is fronting this offer and complains about the club never answering questions?
Isn't this thread about the offer he has made?
Maybe if it wasn't for £51987.35, which will get the owners backs up before they have even read it.
So you are complaining about a Coventry fan (trying to break this deadlock) complaining about not getting answers from the owners , like I said before you and others are in a corner now and will just argue anything, very very sad
You'll forgive me for being more concerned about the actually running of our club than an offer that this fan group knows can not be taken seriously
Just very sad , 90% of our own fans and probably 90+% of fans of other clubs ,when/if there club had been moved away ,would ask ,beg plead why can we not come home ,yet, you want to get fans getting of there arse to try and do something to explain every little detail of any plan ,without asking the only people with the power(the owners) just very sadIn what corner?
I'm saying why is Michael doing exactly what he moans about the club doing
I always see them as a Sermon as on Sundays.Can't you just wait for his weekly email?
This thread and its monster of a father go to show how maddening this whole situation is and how mental it is sending people.
If the "offer" means all SISU have been sent is the publicised letter then their justifiable response can be to laugh it out of town. The responses from KCIC so far today have been at a level I expect from Fisher and Labovich. Challenging and asking questions of them is one thing but stooping to their level is another.
Very poor form in my opinion and playing with fans emotions offering false hope
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Just very sad , 90% of our own fans and probably 90+% of fans of other clubs ,when/if there club had been moved away ,would ask ,beg plead why can we not come home ,yet, you want to get fans getting of there arse to try and do something to explain every little detail of any plan ,without asking the only people with the power(the owners) just very sad
Again you are saying it makes it ok for a fans group to ignore questions which is what they have been ranting about the club going.
Plus most people know the stadium is bollocks.
All of the people trying to divert attention away really don't make Michael look good.
Why can't the fanbase contribute to getting the Club home for us ,the players and the manager, with It's obvious benefits as an overall strategy? It supersedes both parties resistant to those three Substantial priorities ,vital for this clubs survival ,I'm just amazed the Chamber of commerce never got together and thrashed something like this out ages ago .
Rather than exposing agendas It could and should result In healing some of the differences between us all and the club .
If It's not this deal then a better one should be attempted ,there Is no good reason not to do this .
So how is it a fans group with no members?
So Michael does a lot of stuff he believes the fans want his own time his own money most of the time......
Don't forget he is just a normal bloke on average money not like others on here that like to gloat and make out they are something special......
I have been to numerous forums organised and secret at all of them I was 100% assured that the ground will go ahead they have also said that no one is interested in buying CCFC and that they are not interested in selling.
Why should I disbelieve them?
Just want to know where when etc.
So if you believe that I am trying to divert things you are wrong.
This takeover will never happen so it is irrelevant the new ground will?
I just have a feeling the 5,000 number is significant. I thinks it so a line can be in the next newsletter - "sisu won't play in the Ricoh for free and get twice as many as at Sixfields"
I think there is no deal - nothing discussed and its a publicity stunt which has duped an awful lot on here.
I may be wrong - I hope I am - and I hope we get an answer quickly from kcic.
None of us know how serious this offer is. We all more or less know it won't get us anywhere though. It goes against what SISU have been doing to our club for a couple of years now. Why would they give up now?
I have two points.
Why should anyone pay the rent on their behalf whatever the attendances?
It is better for any negotiations to happen without all of the details out in the open until the offer is accepted, refused or ignored. Then it is time to let the world know.
I just have a feeling the 5,000 number is significant. I thinks it so a line can be in the next newsletter - "sisu won't play in the Ricoh for free and get twice as many as at Sixfields"
I think there is no deal - nothing discussed and its a publicity stunt which has duped an awful lot on here.
I may be wrong - I hope I am - and I hope we get an answer quickly from kcic.
None of us know how serious this offer is. We all more or less know it won't get us anywhere though. It goes against what SISU have been doing to our club for a couple of years now. Why would they give up now?
I have two points.
Why should anyone pay the rent on their behalf whatever the attendances?
It is better for any negotiations to happen without all of the details out in the open until the offer is accepted, refused or ignored. Then it is time to let the world know.
Wow that response took lots of intelligence !!!
I'm sure your post won't be deleted because it suits Nicks keep Sisu in agenda !!
Lol !!!
Nick, Grendel, Trench and other social club members.
Its funny that your all whinging about the finer details of the offer from kcic, it has only been a few days.
How many years have we been waiting on answers from your buddies ???
And still waiting but you don't care !!!
It was deleted before I saw this reply, although I would love to know what SISU in agenda this is or is it you just talking rubbish again?
Have you ever posted anything constructive and thought out?
There would be a very powerful reason for doing it. Michael has claimed local businessmen are prepared to pay £1 million.
There is no reason why ACL would not agree to that for at least two years to cover all costs.
Sisu would really have no choice but to agree the deal. Refusing it would be impossible to justify to the community and the Football League. They would be pushed into a corner.
We want the club back - right? If people have made the offer - make the offer.
The offer made through the FL was a better offer than staying at Sixfields. The reply from the FL was that they can't force SISU to do a deal. We will have to wait for the three years to be up at least before we see if the FL has grown a backbone.
Mr trench is extremely ant-sisu as is larks, rusty and Samo. Why are they raising these concerns?
This is how people around here, in the warped world of SkyBlueTalk, get labelled as pro-SISU.
Perish the thought they want things to have the best chance of succeeding, so want some reassurances. No, that must mean they're pro-SISU!
Didn't you warn about SISU at the start? That means that as you didn't agree with the "majority" then it means you are now Pro SISU.
i dont get why 2 threads on the same subject are running
KCIC are fans of the club. The owners including fisher and co are not fans just ruthless business types whose primary purpose is make money that benefits not the club but a foreign owned hedge fund. They care nothing for fans that is blindingly obvious.
Fans would not move the club 35 miles away, not much matters to most of us other then the club playing in Coventry.
So what is that to do with the questions?
I want the club to be back in Coventry, I just think we need to be cynical of everything.
Some of the people who want it to be blindly accepted just to bring us back are the same ones who said the high rent at the Ricoh before was SISU's fault because they accepted it....
Are these the same or different people that want Sisu to own the Ricoh?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?