That wasn’t the point though - the stat was in response to “Allen gave the ball away loads”more than Ben Wilson perhaps he should play in midfield
O'Hare made 54 passes to just 31 from Allen, what's that telling you?
And that’s exactly why you can’t use successful passes as a credible stat solely of how someone performs. How many times did Rose pass to Hyam or JCS and back when there’s no one really challenging them. In comparison it is far easier to pass across the back line than where O’Hare plays.15 times actually according to the stats. Only Kane and Györkeres had worse pass completion.
And that’s exactly why you can’t use successful passes as a credible stat solely of how someone performs. How many times did Rose pass to Hyam or JCS and back when there’s no one really challenging them. In comparison it is far easier to pass across the back line than where O’Hare plays.
Reputation for what? See it the opposite way round tbh
In what way?
Spot on Shmmeee!Wilson - 7: No chance with the goal, looked solid other than that. I’d still drop him for Moore next game though.
Hyam - 7: Some solid defending and a couple of excellent passes.
Rose - 6: Disappointed with his distribution and thought he could’ve done better with the header for their goal.
JCS - 7: Solid, really like him and so calm on the ball.
Kane -7: Some great balls in and unlucky not to be credited with the assist.
Sheaf - 8 (MOTM): Growing more and more, puts his foot in and uses the ball so well.
Hamer - 7: At fault for their goal but scored so will let him off. Really like him and Sheaf in the middle.
Shipley - 8: Excellent. Some real quality passes and gets forward so well, but mostly impressed me with his energy and defending neither of which I expected. Won’t keep his place and likely to go, but a much better send off than his last match.
O’Hare - 5: Awful first half, easier to score his chance than miss it. Hope we can bring an AM in on loan this window.
Allen - 7: Great running and movement, should’ve had two goals. Not a fan of him deeper but love him behind the forward.
Godden - 8: Scores goals
Györkeres - 7: Really unselfish assist and unlucky not to score after the flick over their man, also would’ve scored the OG if the defender hadn’t. Still not the player he was but contributed really well.
Even Shmmeee admits he was harsh on O'Hare with a 5 thoughSpot on Shmmeee!
Even Shmmeee admits he was harsh on O'Hare with a 5 though
O'Hare, Sheaf, Hamer - fuck me,been a long time since we had such quality. Be great to hold onto and develop all three
O'Hare, Sheaf, Hamer - fuck me,been a long time since we had such quality. Be great to hold onto and develop all three
For all his effort, O'hare produces very little, we need someone new to add competition imo, when Fadz, Hyam, Maatsen and Kane have been more of a goal threat than your number 10 has been so far this season, you know you've got a problem.Even Shmmeee admits he was harsh on O'Hare with a 5 though
Never heard once of a club scout watching Sheaf. It's a competitive position and in the top flight deep lying midfielders have little room for any mistakes.
However, Sheaf is progressing into one of the best on the position in the division. Under the radar, though.
I didn't see Allen lose the ball a lot?Ok, so O’Hare was just O’Hare, but Allen had a good game. Tell me your thoughts on the differences of the two today.
Because as far as I can see, Allen hit the post with a good chance, ran around a lot, played some neat passes but gave the ball away a lot. I’m struggling to see how you can judge them differently?
That was simply the worst interview i'd ever heard. Gus did well with some of his answers as the questions were ridiculous. The guy with English as his second language was making a lot more sense than the guy with English as his firstSheaf as a defensive holding midfielder can be a premier league prospect I think. Thing is he looks disciplined whereas Hamer is the opposite - it’s all frantic. I’d imagine poor old Gus is also now suffering from PTSD after that cringe interview with Martin Winch
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?