Wrong....... Fox, 23, became Mowbray’s third signing at Celtic when he completed a £1.5million move from Coventry City on July 24.And fox only went for £750k, we only made a c£200k profit on him
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
Where was it reported to be 8-10 million for Dann and Fox?
Genuine question, I thought all the reports at the time said up to £4 million for Dann and £1.5 million for Fox?
It was reported to be.... in a few sports papers at the time.... My argument was my figures were "Reported as being" not "Estimated facts" as Grenduffy reported...... And Yes you are correct Dan Fox was indeed sold to Celtic for a reported £1.5m. and guess who it was that bought him? None other than Tony Mowbary. Scot Dann was indeed sold to Birmingham for a reported £4m
Not refusing transfer fee information..... I'm refusing your "Estimated Facts" transfer information. You tried to make me look small on this forum when I said Turner went for a reported 750k. You came up with a website's figure claiming it was a estimation given all figures and claimed it to be factual. Yet it has been shown as undisclosed figures. I said Dann and Fox transfer figures were reported to be in the region £8-10m for both You came up with your estimated figures once again claiming them to be fact... Yet again to be "Undisclosed" I never once stated my figures were FACT, I said "Reported to be" and once again you took the piss...Again. Now finally look at the "Reported figures" in the Telegraph... Whose laughing now?......
http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/spo...n-cash-3036786
<snip>
As for Reda <snip>
Prior to the injury which kept him out for the season, <snip> looked like he could play a lot more games than the previous season.
No it was an argument about Westwood - your estimated facts diatribe came from that as "you'd heard" we'd paid £250,000 for him.
You are losing it.
Wrong, the official documents leaked in telegraph by Hoffman shoe that fox only went for £700k.Wrong....... Fox, 23, became Mowbray’s third signing at Celtic when he completed a £1.5million move from Coventry City on July 24.
There are plenty of posters on here that know you're a word twister and that it's you that is lying. Are you denying you used "estimated transfer fees" as fact? Even your best mate Torchy will call you a liar!
Sorry but you're the one who hasn't read it properly.It states INSTALMENT!
What is £35k 5% of??? Yes that's right £700k. Fox went for £700k. Not £1.5m you keep quoting.Look again It says Instalment, not payment in full or anything else. Top of the page it says..... Transfer fee instalment-promissory note.
Paragraph 2. states once again, "Celtic is entitled to withhold 5% (£35,000) of the instalment"... further along it says..."Consequently the amount payable under the promissory note is restricted to £665,000. Where are the other instalment papers?..... Have a look at the next "Transfer Deal" of Leon Best to Newcastle for £1.5m. Nothing about "Instalments" in that document. A straight cash deal +VAT..... Not as clear cut as you make it sound, eh?
I repeat the comment you made about turner was not true.
This catchphrase of yours was to do with transfer fees spent. You made some wild claim the free for the likes of Westwood was tiny and total spend was something around £1.5 million.
You even resurrected the thread for some bizarre reason which led to further ridicule - no I've never said the phrase "estimated facts"
You lying twat! You produced figures from a website saying they were "Estimations" but as close to being FACT as anyone would get., and that's a FACT! By using these "Estimations" and portraying them as actual figures when they were infact "Undisclosed"!
This was a decent thread. If you want to argue back and forth about how much fox went for however many years ago, do it through pm please.
I said the website estimated transfers fees based on the information that was available and was certainly more factual
There you go boys and girls after 4 years he finally admits it :claping hands:than some random poster (namely you) making unfounded wild statements on a forum.
There you go boys and girls after 4 years he finally admits it :claping hands:
I would say you've just had a Elephant dump on yours!....... How can a "Estimation" be factual? As for unfounded wild statements on a forum, I merely quoted Sports newspapers who "Reportedly" showed transfer fee quotes.
What is £35k 5% of??? Yes that's right £700k. Fox went for £700k. Not £1.5m you keep quoting.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
This was a decent thread. If you want to argue back and forth about how much fox went for however many years ago, do it through pm please.
Prior to everyone's injury, it looks like they will remain uninjured.
the last thing I expected on this thread was a copy of the contract between CCFC and Celtic for the Danny Fox sale. I thought there would be more chance of seeing a thread about a parrot
Think a copy of jodi Jones contract might settle a few fears
What is £35k 5% of??? Yes that's right £700k. Fox went for £700k. Not £1.5m you keep quoting.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
In fairness maybe I'm misreading it as well but to me that doesn't confirm beyond doubt that the total fee was 700k. It says a payment of £700k was due on 31 July 10 and Celtic were entitled to withhold 5% of that payment for whatever reason.
To me doesn't rule out the possibility that other installments or other clauses were paid at a later (or earlier) date. The letter is just a signed document saying Celtic are committed to paying X amount on the specified date, it doesn't define the terms or clauses of the transfer in the same way the document between Walsall and Coventry does.
emmanuel frimpong anyone?
sent from my vf-895n using tapatalk
Someone said we'd been linked with Jack Marriott of Luton. Spoke to a Luton fan I know about it, he said there's not a chance we'll get him and he'll be playing in the Championship next season.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?