Anyone thought about Richard Keogh? Got released after that incident at Derby but has been a captain in a team consistently challenging for play offs and still has a couple of good years left you would think
This was the posts doing the rounds at the time of the incident.
Warning: Bit Grim
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EFfBTxkWoAUmQDT.jpg
The only Hewlett I know of at our place was Matt Hewlett and that was ages ago. We haven't got one in our current first team / reserve / U 23 / U 18 / academy squads as far as I know.Have you heard anything about Hewlett? Heard he’s got a reputation around Bristol as a bit of party boy who likes the Charlie? Any ideas?
I suggested Shankland from Dundee a while back , 24 goals in 26 admittedly it’s a massive step up from but I think he would be a fantastic addition
Marcus Maddison is now a free agent
Probably because they played together at Ayr and are mates....Saw he commented on one of Michael Rose’s tweets the other day. Probably means nothing but hey.
Marcus Maddison is now a free agent
Probably because they played together at Ayr and are mates....
maddison for me, no brainer.
52 goals and 76 assists in 212 League One career appearances.
I think he would be disrupted in the dressing room, team spirit!
They used to play together at Ayr so possibly just from thatSaw he commented on one of Michael Rose’s tweets the other day. Probably means nothing but hey.
RubbishIf we stick with the current formation we will need a cb, lwb, 2 x cm, cam and a striker just for the first 11.
Turned down a previous Championship move (wanted too much - wages?) Mackems would love him, but won't be able to afford him..
Rubbish
When you consider we've just lost McCallum, O'Hare and Walsh so are currently considerably weaker than we were a few weeks back, I completely agree. I'm hoping 2 of those 3 come back but I won't get my hopes up.If we stick with the current formation we will need a cb, lwb, 2 x cm, cam and a striker just for the first 11.
No thanks. Too much of the billy big time about him.
You highlight we need six players just for a start, out of the team that won the last game at Ipswich who do say needs replacing, I’ll give you the loanees so who are the other three ?Ill grant you managers should always be on the look out for better players even Liverpool are doing that but your comment eludes to atleast three not good enough to even start, despite losing only three games all season, one of those Tranmere being a freak.
Mcfadzean, Kelly and Godden are the other three which could have been deduced from the positions I listed. Yeah they were excellent in league one no doubt. It’s a big big step up as we all know and fans of other teams keep telling us. Nothing against those three players and they will get game time next year (unless money is offered from league one for Godden).
Would be a top signing, reckon a few to many clubs will be after him though who can offer bigger wages.I suggested Shankland from Dundee a while back , 24 goals in 26 admittedly it’s a massive step up from but I think he would be a fantastic addition
McFadzean of course being one of the only players in the side with experience at that level, and experience of staying up with Burton.
Godden is scoring goals and fits the system, MacFadzean the fan favourite for being not good enough, had a shocker at Rotherham but imo has been our best defender since the New Year and as for Liam Kelly again imo mr consistent, quietly does his job, tends to play every minute too, I suggest he’s first name on the team sheet. Of course if there are better players to be had if we can we should try and get them but to suggest they need to be jettisoned immediate is rubbish in my opinion.
McFadzean of course being one of the only players in the side with experience at that level, and experience of staying up with Burton.
Mary Lou how are you?Come on FP let us not pretend most of our fans have a clue about football
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?